The Canadian Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome (CHILDNEPH) project: Overview of design and methods

Susan Samuel, Shannon Scott, Catherine Morgan, Allison Dart, Cherry Mammen, Rulan Parekh, Alberto Nettel-Aguirre, Allison Eddy, Rachel Flynn, Maury Pinsk, Andrew Wade, Steven Arora, Geneviéve Benoit, Martin Bitzan, Robin Erickson, Janusz Feber, Guido Filler, Pavel Geier, Colette Girardin, Silviu GrisaruJames Tee, Kyle Kemp, Michael Zappitelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Nephrotic syndrome is a commonly acquired kidney disease in children that causes significant morbidity due to recurrent episodes of heavy proteinuria. The management of childhood nephrotic syndrome is known to be highly variable among physicians and care centres. Objectives: The primary objective of the study is to determine centre-, physician-, and patient-level characteristics associated with steroid exposure and length of steroid treatment. We will also determine the association of dose and duration of steroid treatment and time to first relapse as a secondary aim. An embedded qualitative study utilizing focus groups with health care providers will enrich the quantitative results by providing an understanding of the attitudes, beliefs and local contextual factors driving variation in care. Design: Mixed-methods study; prospective observational cohort (quantitative component), with additional semi-structured focus groups of healthcare professionals (qualitative component). Setting: National study, comprised of all 13 Canadian pediatric nephrology clinics. Patients: 400 patients under 18 years of age to be recruited over 2.5 years. Measurements: Steroid doses for all episodes (first presentation, first and subsequent relapses) tracked over course of the study. Physician and centre-level characteristics catalogued, with reasons for treatment preferences documented during focus groups. Methods: All patients tracked prospectively over the course of the study, with data comprising a prospective registry. One focus group at each site to enrich understanding of variation in care. Limitations: Contamination of treatment protocols between physicians may occur as a result of concurrent focus groups. Conclusions: Quantitative and qualitative results will be integrated at end of study and will collectively inform strategies for the development and implementation of standardized evidence-based protocols across centres.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number17
JournalCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cohort study
  • Nephrotic syndrome
  • Practice variation
  • Qualitative methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Canadian Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome (CHILDNEPH) project: Overview of design and methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this