The Bidirectional Relationship between Vision and Cognition: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Tai Anh Vu, Eva K. Fenwick, Alfred T.L. Gan, Ryan E.K. Man, Benjamin K.J. Tan, Preeti Gupta, Kam Chun Ho, Carlos A. Reyes-Ortiz, Stella Trompet, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Joan M. O'Brien, Sigrid Mueller-Schotte, Tien Yin Wong, Yih Chung Tham, Ching Yu Cheng, Allen T.C. Lee, Greta Rait, Bonnielin K. Swenor, Varshini Varadaraj, Willa D. BrenowitzFelipe A. Medeiros, Virginie Naël, Kaavya Narasimhalu, Christopher L.H. Chen, Ecosse L. Lamoureux

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Topic: Visual impairment (VI) and cognitive impairment (CIM) are prevalent age-related conditions that impose substantial burden on the society. Findings on the hypothesized bidirectional association of VI and CIM remains equivocal. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine this bidirectional relationship. Clinical Relevance: Sixty percent risk of CIM has not been well elucidated in the literature. A bidirectional relationship between VI and CIM may support the development of strategies for early detection and management of risk factors for both conditions in older people. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central registers were searched systematically for observational studies, published from inception until April 6, 2020, in adults 40 years of age or older reporting objectively measured VI and CIM assessment using clinically validated cognitive screening tests or diagnostic evaluation. Meta-analyses on cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between VI and CIM outcomes (any CIM assessed using screening tests and clinically diagnosed dementia) were examined. Random effect models were used to generate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also examined study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity. Results: Forty studies were included (n = 47 913 570). Meta-analyses confirmed that persons with VI were more likely to have CIM, with significantly higher odds of: (1) any CIM (cross-sectional: OR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.84–3.07]; longitudinal: OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.46–1.89]) and (2) clinically diagnosed dementia (cross-sectional: OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.48–4.01]; longitudinal: OR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.37–3.21]) compared with persons without VI. Significant heterogeneity was explained partially by differences in age, sex, and follow-up duration. Also, some evidence suggested that individuals with CIM, relative to cognitively intact persons, were more likely to have VI, with most articles (8/9 [89%]) reporting significantly positive associations; however, meta-analyses on this association could not be conducted because of insufficient data. Discussion: Overall, our work suggests that VI is a risk factor of CIM, although further work is needed to confirm the association of CIM as a risk factor for VI. Strategies for early detection and management of both conditions in older people may minimize individual clinical and public health consequences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)981-992
Number of pages12
JournalOphthalmology
Volume128
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Bidirectional
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Dementia
  • Visual acuity
  • Visual impairment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Bidirectional Relationship between Vision and Cognition: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this