TY - JOUR
T1 - The Association between Frailty and Uncorrected Refractive Error in Older Adults
AU - Lee, Moon Jeong
AU - Varadaraj, Varshini
AU - Tian, Jing
AU - Bandeen-Roche, Karen
AU - Swenor, Bonnielin K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Johns Hopkins University Older Americans Independence Center NIA at NIH under Grant P30 AG021334 and NIA at NIH under Grant K01 AG052640. This submission has not been published elsewhere previously and is not simultaneously being considered for any other publication. It has been reviewed and rejected by Journal of American Geriatrics Society, and Age and Ageing. We did not receive any feedback from Journal of American Geriatrics Society. Criticism from Age and Ageing included the use of an “arbitrary” cutoff of 6/12 and the exclusion of non-refractive causes of visual impairment such as cataract and glaucoma. Ultimately, they felt that this manuscript was not suitable for their audience. Our cutoff of 6/12 was chosen in accordance with the American Academy of Ophthalmology criteria for visual impairment. Pertaining to causes of visual impairment that cannot be corrected with refraction, while we did analyze visual impairment not due to refractive error, the results were not included in this manuscript as we felt the public health implications of the results differed, and the impact of uncorrected refractive error (URE), commonly seen of as a trivial problem, warranted a separate manuscript. In addition, the NHANES data for ophthalmic diseases such as glaucoma or age-related macular degeneration were collected for certain years, but this data was not available for all of the cycle years analyzed in this study. Prior studies investigating the association between visual impairment and frailty have used subjective assessments of vision–known to be poorly correlated with objective vision measures. This study advances our understanding of the vision-frailty relationship by using objective assessments of vision, and specifically, focuses on URE, an easily correctable vision problem, that is currently the leading cause of impaired vision in older adults.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2020/5/3
Y1 - 2020/5/3
N2 - Purpose: Uncorrected refractive error (URE) is the leading cause of impaired vision in older adults and has been associated with adverse health outcomes. Here, we investigate the association between URE and frailty in older adults. Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants ≥60 years (1999–2006 cycles). URE was defined as visual acuity worse than 6/12 that can be improved with correction, and prefrailty and frailty were defined as meeting 1–2 and ≥3 of 4 components of a modified physical frailty phenotype. The 5-item phenotype (including slowness) was analyzed in a subset of participants with available data. Propensity score adjustment was used to address the imbalance of potential confounders (including age) between URE groups. Results: In this sample (n = 5,265), 6% of participants had URE (n = 373). In fully adjusted propensity score-based models, individuals with URE were more likely to be prefrail (OR = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0–2.0) and frail (OR = 3.2; 95% CI: 1.3–7.4) than those without URE using the 4-item phenotype. For the 2,486 participants with 5-item phenotype data, individuals with URE were more likely to be frail (OR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.2–7.5); however, the association with prefrailty was not statistically significant (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 0.9–3.6). Conclusion: In this population-based sample, older adults with URE were more likely to be frail than those without URE, even after rigorous control for confounders, including age.
AB - Purpose: Uncorrected refractive error (URE) is the leading cause of impaired vision in older adults and has been associated with adverse health outcomes. Here, we investigate the association between URE and frailty in older adults. Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants ≥60 years (1999–2006 cycles). URE was defined as visual acuity worse than 6/12 that can be improved with correction, and prefrailty and frailty were defined as meeting 1–2 and ≥3 of 4 components of a modified physical frailty phenotype. The 5-item phenotype (including slowness) was analyzed in a subset of participants with available data. Propensity score adjustment was used to address the imbalance of potential confounders (including age) between URE groups. Results: In this sample (n = 5,265), 6% of participants had URE (n = 373). In fully adjusted propensity score-based models, individuals with URE were more likely to be prefrail (OR = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0–2.0) and frail (OR = 3.2; 95% CI: 1.3–7.4) than those without URE using the 4-item phenotype. For the 2,486 participants with 5-item phenotype data, individuals with URE were more likely to be frail (OR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.2–7.5); however, the association with prefrailty was not statistically significant (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 0.9–3.6). Conclusion: In this population-based sample, older adults with URE were more likely to be frail than those without URE, even after rigorous control for confounders, including age.
KW - Frailty
KW - uncorrected refractive error
KW - vision
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078629590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078629590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09286586.2020.1716380
DO - 10.1080/09286586.2020.1716380
M3 - Article
C2 - 31952461
AN - SCOPUS:85078629590
SN - 0928-6586
VL - 27
SP - 219
EP - 225
JO - Ophthalmic Epidemiology
JF - Ophthalmic Epidemiology
IS - 3
ER -