TY - JOUR
T1 - The association between continuity of care and the overuse of medical procedures
AU - Romano, Max J.
AU - Segal, Jodi B.
AU - Pollack, Craig Evan
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - IMPORTANCE Both the overuse of unnecessary medical procedures and poor continuity of care are thought to contribute to high health care spending and poor patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between care continuity and use of potentially unnecessary procedures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Observational retrospective cohort (n = 1 208 250 patients > 65 years) using 5%Medicare fee-for-service claims from 2008. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES We evaluated continuity using the Bice-Boxerman continuity of care index.We measured overuse using a previously validated set of 19 potentially overused procedures. RESULTS Altogether, 14.7%of patients received at least 1 potentially overused procedure during the calendar year. For each 0.1 increase in the continuity score (0.4 SDs), patients had 0.93 times the odds of receiving overused procedures than those with lower scores (95%CI, 0.93-0.94). Higher continuity was significantly associated with lower odds of 9 procedures (Holm-Bonferroni corrected P < .02 was significant: 6 of 13 diagnostic tests [with ORs, 0.84-0.99; P < .001] and 3 therapeutic procedures [with ORs 0.81-0.87; P<.001]). Conversely, higher continuity was significantly associated with increased overuse for 3 procedures (1 diagnostic test [OR, 1.06; P < .001], 1 of 2 screening tests [OR, 1.05; P < .001], and the single monitoring test [OR, 1.03; P< .01]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Increased continuity was associated with an overall decrease in overuse, suggesting a potential benefit of high-continuity care; however, the strength and direction of the association varied according to the specific procedure.
AB - IMPORTANCE Both the overuse of unnecessary medical procedures and poor continuity of care are thought to contribute to high health care spending and poor patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between care continuity and use of potentially unnecessary procedures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Observational retrospective cohort (n = 1 208 250 patients > 65 years) using 5%Medicare fee-for-service claims from 2008. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES We evaluated continuity using the Bice-Boxerman continuity of care index.We measured overuse using a previously validated set of 19 potentially overused procedures. RESULTS Altogether, 14.7%of patients received at least 1 potentially overused procedure during the calendar year. For each 0.1 increase in the continuity score (0.4 SDs), patients had 0.93 times the odds of receiving overused procedures than those with lower scores (95%CI, 0.93-0.94). Higher continuity was significantly associated with lower odds of 9 procedures (Holm-Bonferroni corrected P < .02 was significant: 6 of 13 diagnostic tests [with ORs, 0.84-0.99; P < .001] and 3 therapeutic procedures [with ORs 0.81-0.87; P<.001]). Conversely, higher continuity was significantly associated with increased overuse for 3 procedures (1 diagnostic test [OR, 1.06; P < .001], 1 of 2 screening tests [OR, 1.05; P < .001], and the single monitoring test [OR, 1.03; P< .01]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Increased continuity was associated with an overall decrease in overuse, suggesting a potential benefit of high-continuity care; however, the strength and direction of the association varied according to the specific procedure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937485185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937485185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1340
DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1340
M3 - Article
C2 - 25984883
AN - SCOPUS:84937485185
SN - 2168-6106
VL - 175
SP - 1148
EP - 1154
JO - JAMA internal medicine
JF - JAMA internal medicine
IS - 7
ER -