The application of two health and productivity instruments at a large employer

Ronald J. Ozminkowski, Ronnie Goetzel, Stella Chang, Stacey Long

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We applied two productivity instruments (the Work Productivity Short Inventory and the Work Limitations Questionnaire) to the same employees working at a large telecommunications firm. In this work we note differences in productivity metrics obtained from these instruments and offer reasons for those differences that may be related to their design. Within this sample, average at-work productivity (presenteeism) losses were 4.9% as measured by the WLQ and 6.9% as measured by the WPSI. These translated into losses of approximately $2000 to $2800 per employee per year, respectively. Total productivity losses were usually not associated with demographics or job type but were associated with perceived health status and the existence of particular medical conditions. Both instruments may be useful for employers who want to estimate productivity losses and learn where to focus their energy to help stem those losses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)635-648
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume46
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Efficiency
Health
Telecommunications
Health Status
Demography
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

The application of two health and productivity instruments at a large employer. / Ozminkowski, Ronald J.; Goetzel, Ronnie; Chang, Stella; Long, Stacey.

In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 46, No. 7, 07.2004, p. 635-648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ozminkowski, Ronald J. ; Goetzel, Ronnie ; Chang, Stella ; Long, Stacey. / The application of two health and productivity instruments at a large employer. In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 46, No. 7. pp. 635-648.
@article{ca0b9a639e1b4a2ba961a07e4d310f23,
title = "The application of two health and productivity instruments at a large employer",
abstract = "We applied two productivity instruments (the Work Productivity Short Inventory and the Work Limitations Questionnaire) to the same employees working at a large telecommunications firm. In this work we note differences in productivity metrics obtained from these instruments and offer reasons for those differences that may be related to their design. Within this sample, average at-work productivity (presenteeism) losses were 4.9{\%} as measured by the WLQ and 6.9{\%} as measured by the WPSI. These translated into losses of approximately $2000 to $2800 per employee per year, respectively. Total productivity losses were usually not associated with demographics or job type but were associated with perceived health status and the existence of particular medical conditions. Both instruments may be useful for employers who want to estimate productivity losses and learn where to focus their energy to help stem those losses.",
author = "Ozminkowski, {Ronald J.} and Ronnie Goetzel and Stella Chang and Stacey Long",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/01.jom.0000131797.52458.c8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "635--648",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1076-2752",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The application of two health and productivity instruments at a large employer

AU - Ozminkowski, Ronald J.

AU - Goetzel, Ronnie

AU - Chang, Stella

AU - Long, Stacey

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - We applied two productivity instruments (the Work Productivity Short Inventory and the Work Limitations Questionnaire) to the same employees working at a large telecommunications firm. In this work we note differences in productivity metrics obtained from these instruments and offer reasons for those differences that may be related to their design. Within this sample, average at-work productivity (presenteeism) losses were 4.9% as measured by the WLQ and 6.9% as measured by the WPSI. These translated into losses of approximately $2000 to $2800 per employee per year, respectively. Total productivity losses were usually not associated with demographics or job type but were associated with perceived health status and the existence of particular medical conditions. Both instruments may be useful for employers who want to estimate productivity losses and learn where to focus their energy to help stem those losses.

AB - We applied two productivity instruments (the Work Productivity Short Inventory and the Work Limitations Questionnaire) to the same employees working at a large telecommunications firm. In this work we note differences in productivity metrics obtained from these instruments and offer reasons for those differences that may be related to their design. Within this sample, average at-work productivity (presenteeism) losses were 4.9% as measured by the WLQ and 6.9% as measured by the WPSI. These translated into losses of approximately $2000 to $2800 per employee per year, respectively. Total productivity losses were usually not associated with demographics or job type but were associated with perceived health status and the existence of particular medical conditions. Both instruments may be useful for employers who want to estimate productivity losses and learn where to focus their energy to help stem those losses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142733503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142733503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.jom.0000131797.52458.c8

DO - 10.1097/01.jom.0000131797.52458.c8

M3 - Article

C2 - 15247802

AN - SCOPUS:3142733503

VL - 46

SP - 635

EP - 648

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1076-2752

IS - 7

ER -