The Annex C Fallacy

Why unscreened databases are usually preferable for comparison of industrially exposed groups

Robert A. Dobie, Yuri Agrawal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

One can study occupational noise exposure by comparing hearing thresholds of exposed people to control data from national or international standards. ANSI S3.44 (1996) offers Annex C - thresholds for people without occupational noise exposure - as appropriate control data for such comparisons. Annex C is based on the false assumption that people who have had occupational noise exposure are similar in all other important ways to those without such exposures. In fact, people with noisy jobs are more likely than others to be smokers, diabetics, poorly educated, white and exposed to non-occupational noise. Taking these other risk factors into account, the appropriate thresholds for comparison to industrial study populations are closer to those of the unscreened population than to an 'Annex C' population that simply excludes occupationally noise-exposed persons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-35
Number of pages7
JournalAudiology and Neurotology
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Occupational Noise
Occupational Exposure
Databases
Noise
Population
Hearing

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Epidemiology
  • Hearing loss
  • Non-occupational noise
  • Occupational noise
  • Regression
  • Risk factor
  • Smoking
  • Socioeconomic status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Speech and Hearing
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The Annex C Fallacy : Why unscreened databases are usually preferable for comparison of industrially exposed groups. / Dobie, Robert A.; Agrawal, Yuri.

In: Audiology and Neurotology, Vol. 16, No. 1, 12.2010, p. 29-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8571961942540a996de4ed19794c2cb,
title = "The Annex C Fallacy: Why unscreened databases are usually preferable for comparison of industrially exposed groups",
abstract = "One can study occupational noise exposure by comparing hearing thresholds of exposed people to control data from national or international standards. ANSI S3.44 (1996) offers Annex C - thresholds for people without occupational noise exposure - as appropriate control data for such comparisons. Annex C is based on the false assumption that people who have had occupational noise exposure are similar in all other important ways to those without such exposures. In fact, people with noisy jobs are more likely than others to be smokers, diabetics, poorly educated, white and exposed to non-occupational noise. Taking these other risk factors into account, the appropriate thresholds for comparison to industrial study populations are closer to those of the unscreened population than to an 'Annex C' population that simply excludes occupationally noise-exposed persons.",
keywords = "Diabetes, Epidemiology, Hearing loss, Non-occupational noise, Occupational noise, Regression, Risk factor, Smoking, Socioeconomic status",
author = "Dobie, {Robert A.} and Yuri Agrawal",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1159/000308452",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "29--35",
journal = "Audiology and Neuro-Otology",
issn = "1420-3030",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Annex C Fallacy

T2 - Why unscreened databases are usually preferable for comparison of industrially exposed groups

AU - Dobie, Robert A.

AU - Agrawal, Yuri

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - One can study occupational noise exposure by comparing hearing thresholds of exposed people to control data from national or international standards. ANSI S3.44 (1996) offers Annex C - thresholds for people without occupational noise exposure - as appropriate control data for such comparisons. Annex C is based on the false assumption that people who have had occupational noise exposure are similar in all other important ways to those without such exposures. In fact, people with noisy jobs are more likely than others to be smokers, diabetics, poorly educated, white and exposed to non-occupational noise. Taking these other risk factors into account, the appropriate thresholds for comparison to industrial study populations are closer to those of the unscreened population than to an 'Annex C' population that simply excludes occupationally noise-exposed persons.

AB - One can study occupational noise exposure by comparing hearing thresholds of exposed people to control data from national or international standards. ANSI S3.44 (1996) offers Annex C - thresholds for people without occupational noise exposure - as appropriate control data for such comparisons. Annex C is based on the false assumption that people who have had occupational noise exposure are similar in all other important ways to those without such exposures. In fact, people with noisy jobs are more likely than others to be smokers, diabetics, poorly educated, white and exposed to non-occupational noise. Taking these other risk factors into account, the appropriate thresholds for comparison to industrial study populations are closer to those of the unscreened population than to an 'Annex C' population that simply excludes occupationally noise-exposed persons.

KW - Diabetes

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Hearing loss

KW - Non-occupational noise

KW - Occupational noise

KW - Regression

KW - Risk factor

KW - Smoking

KW - Socioeconomic status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952853401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952853401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000308452

DO - 10.1159/000308452

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 29

EP - 35

JO - Audiology and Neuro-Otology

JF - Audiology and Neuro-Otology

SN - 1420-3030

IS - 1

ER -