The anatomy of health care team training and the state of practice

A critical review

Eduardo Salas, Sallie Weaver, Rebecca Lyons, Deborah Diazgranados, Michael Rosen, James Oglesby, Jeffrey S. Augenstein, David J. Birnbach, Donald Robinson, Heidi B. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: As the U.S. health care system enters a new era, the importance of team-based care approaches grows. How is the health care community ensuring that providers and administrators are equipped with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) foundational for effective teamwork? Are these KSAs transferring into daily practice? This review summarizes the present state of practice for health care team training described in published literature. Drawing from empirical investigations of training effectiveness, the authors explore training design, implementation, and evaluation to provide insight into the shape, structure, and anatomy of team training in health care. METHOD: A 2009 literature search yielded 40 peer-reviewed articles detailing health care team training evaluations. Guided by 11 focal questions, two trained raters extracted details regarding training design, implementation, evaluation metrics, and outcomes. RESULTS: Findings indicate that team training is being implemented across a wide spectrum of providers and is primarily targeting communication, situational awareness, leadership, and role clarity. Relatively few details indicate how training needs were established. Most studies collected data immediately posttraining; however, less than 30% collected data six months or more posttraining. Content analyses highlight the need for enhanced detail in published training evaluation reports. CONCLUSIONS: In many respects, health care team training implementation and evaluation align with best practices suggested from the science of training, adult learning, and human performance; however, opportunities for improvement exist. The authors suggest several mechanisms for furthering the health care team training evidence base to enhance patient safety and work environment quality for clinicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1746-1760
Number of pages15
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume85
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Care Team
Anatomy
health care
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Safety
evaluation
Administrative Personnel
Practice Guidelines
Communication
Learning
teamwork
work environment
best practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

The anatomy of health care team training and the state of practice : A critical review. / Salas, Eduardo; Weaver, Sallie; Lyons, Rebecca; Diazgranados, Deborah; Rosen, Michael; Oglesby, James; Augenstein, Jeffrey S.; Birnbach, David J.; Robinson, Donald; King, Heidi B.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 85, No. 11, 11.2010, p. 1746-1760.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Salas, E, Weaver, S, Lyons, R, Diazgranados, D, Rosen, M, Oglesby, J, Augenstein, JS, Birnbach, DJ, Robinson, D & King, HB 2010, 'The anatomy of health care team training and the state of practice: A critical review', Academic Medicine, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 1746-1760. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f2e907
Salas, Eduardo ; Weaver, Sallie ; Lyons, Rebecca ; Diazgranados, Deborah ; Rosen, Michael ; Oglesby, James ; Augenstein, Jeffrey S. ; Birnbach, David J. ; Robinson, Donald ; King, Heidi B. / The anatomy of health care team training and the state of practice : A critical review. In: Academic Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 85, No. 11. pp. 1746-1760.
@article{975d608a4e044b3a9af688ad1a3d7fc6,
title = "The anatomy of health care team training and the state of practice: A critical review",
abstract = "PURPOSE: As the U.S. health care system enters a new era, the importance of team-based care approaches grows. How is the health care community ensuring that providers and administrators are equipped with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) foundational for effective teamwork? Are these KSAs transferring into daily practice? This review summarizes the present state of practice for health care team training described in published literature. Drawing from empirical investigations of training effectiveness, the authors explore training design, implementation, and evaluation to provide insight into the shape, structure, and anatomy of team training in health care. METHOD: A 2009 literature search yielded 40 peer-reviewed articles detailing health care team training evaluations. Guided by 11 focal questions, two trained raters extracted details regarding training design, implementation, evaluation metrics, and outcomes. RESULTS: Findings indicate that team training is being implemented across a wide spectrum of providers and is primarily targeting communication, situational awareness, leadership, and role clarity. Relatively few details indicate how training needs were established. Most studies collected data immediately posttraining; however, less than 30{\%} collected data six months or more posttraining. Content analyses highlight the need for enhanced detail in published training evaluation reports. CONCLUSIONS: In many respects, health care team training implementation and evaluation align with best practices suggested from the science of training, adult learning, and human performance; however, opportunities for improvement exist. The authors suggest several mechanisms for furthering the health care team training evidence base to enhance patient safety and work environment quality for clinicians.",
author = "Eduardo Salas and Sallie Weaver and Rebecca Lyons and Deborah Diazgranados and Michael Rosen and James Oglesby and Augenstein, {Jeffrey S.} and Birnbach, {David J.} and Donald Robinson and King, {Heidi B.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f2e907",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "1746--1760",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The anatomy of health care team training and the state of practice

T2 - A critical review

AU - Salas, Eduardo

AU - Weaver, Sallie

AU - Lyons, Rebecca

AU - Diazgranados, Deborah

AU - Rosen, Michael

AU - Oglesby, James

AU - Augenstein, Jeffrey S.

AU - Birnbach, David J.

AU - Robinson, Donald

AU - King, Heidi B.

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - PURPOSE: As the U.S. health care system enters a new era, the importance of team-based care approaches grows. How is the health care community ensuring that providers and administrators are equipped with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) foundational for effective teamwork? Are these KSAs transferring into daily practice? This review summarizes the present state of practice for health care team training described in published literature. Drawing from empirical investigations of training effectiveness, the authors explore training design, implementation, and evaluation to provide insight into the shape, structure, and anatomy of team training in health care. METHOD: A 2009 literature search yielded 40 peer-reviewed articles detailing health care team training evaluations. Guided by 11 focal questions, two trained raters extracted details regarding training design, implementation, evaluation metrics, and outcomes. RESULTS: Findings indicate that team training is being implemented across a wide spectrum of providers and is primarily targeting communication, situational awareness, leadership, and role clarity. Relatively few details indicate how training needs were established. Most studies collected data immediately posttraining; however, less than 30% collected data six months or more posttraining. Content analyses highlight the need for enhanced detail in published training evaluation reports. CONCLUSIONS: In many respects, health care team training implementation and evaluation align with best practices suggested from the science of training, adult learning, and human performance; however, opportunities for improvement exist. The authors suggest several mechanisms for furthering the health care team training evidence base to enhance patient safety and work environment quality for clinicians.

AB - PURPOSE: As the U.S. health care system enters a new era, the importance of team-based care approaches grows. How is the health care community ensuring that providers and administrators are equipped with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) foundational for effective teamwork? Are these KSAs transferring into daily practice? This review summarizes the present state of practice for health care team training described in published literature. Drawing from empirical investigations of training effectiveness, the authors explore training design, implementation, and evaluation to provide insight into the shape, structure, and anatomy of team training in health care. METHOD: A 2009 literature search yielded 40 peer-reviewed articles detailing health care team training evaluations. Guided by 11 focal questions, two trained raters extracted details regarding training design, implementation, evaluation metrics, and outcomes. RESULTS: Findings indicate that team training is being implemented across a wide spectrum of providers and is primarily targeting communication, situational awareness, leadership, and role clarity. Relatively few details indicate how training needs were established. Most studies collected data immediately posttraining; however, less than 30% collected data six months or more posttraining. Content analyses highlight the need for enhanced detail in published training evaluation reports. CONCLUSIONS: In many respects, health care team training implementation and evaluation align with best practices suggested from the science of training, adult learning, and human performance; however, opportunities for improvement exist. The authors suggest several mechanisms for furthering the health care team training evidence base to enhance patient safety and work environment quality for clinicians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649324690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649324690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f2e907

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f2e907

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 1746

EP - 1760

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 11

ER -