The added value of claims for cancer surveillance: Results of varying case definitions

Lynne Penberthy, Donna McClish, Claudine Manning, Sheldon Retchin, Thomas J Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: As cancer diagnosis and treatment has moved to the outpatient Healthcare setting, traditional cancer surveillance tools are less effective for complete and unbiased capture of incident cases. This study evaluates the potential for Medicare data to supplement cancer surveillance in a unique manner by using a standard that is independent of a central cancer registry. Design: State cancer registry records were matched with Medicare data. Case validation included inpatient record abstraction combined with a mail/telephone survey of treating physicians. The positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity (capture rate), and potential additional cases were calculated for 6 Medicare claims-based case definitions. Results: The PPV varied according to cancer site and definition, ranging from 70%-97% (prostate) to 87%-98% (breast). Sensitivity varied inversely with PPV, ranging from 51%-94% (breast) to 10%-88% (lung). The most important factors that predicted being missed by the registry were having no admission to an ACOS-certified hospital and no surgical treatment. Conclusion: Medicare data represent a valid resource for supplementing state cancer registries in surveillance efforts. This potential is especially applicable to cancers predominantly diagnosed and treated outside the hospital setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)705-712
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Care
Volume43
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

value added
surveillance
cancer
Medicare
Registries
Neoplasms
Breast
Postal Service
abstraction
Telephone
supplement
telephone
Inpatients
Prostate
incident
Outpatients
physician
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Lung

Keywords

  • Cancer surveillance
  • Claims
  • Incidence
  • Validation study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

The added value of claims for cancer surveillance : Results of varying case definitions. / Penberthy, Lynne; McClish, Donna; Manning, Claudine; Retchin, Sheldon; Smith, Thomas J.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 43, No. 7, 07.2005, p. 705-712.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Penberthy, Lynne ; McClish, Donna ; Manning, Claudine ; Retchin, Sheldon ; Smith, Thomas J. / The added value of claims for cancer surveillance : Results of varying case definitions. In: Medical Care. 2005 ; Vol. 43, No. 7. pp. 705-712.
@article{e6a090208dce4f03add0b6dfed6f9592,
title = "The added value of claims for cancer surveillance: Results of varying case definitions",
abstract = "Objective: As cancer diagnosis and treatment has moved to the outpatient Healthcare setting, traditional cancer surveillance tools are less effective for complete and unbiased capture of incident cases. This study evaluates the potential for Medicare data to supplement cancer surveillance in a unique manner by using a standard that is independent of a central cancer registry. Design: State cancer registry records were matched with Medicare data. Case validation included inpatient record abstraction combined with a mail/telephone survey of treating physicians. The positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity (capture rate), and potential additional cases were calculated for 6 Medicare claims-based case definitions. Results: The PPV varied according to cancer site and definition, ranging from 70{\%}-97{\%} (prostate) to 87{\%}-98{\%} (breast). Sensitivity varied inversely with PPV, ranging from 51{\%}-94{\%} (breast) to 10{\%}-88{\%} (lung). The most important factors that predicted being missed by the registry were having no admission to an ACOS-certified hospital and no surgical treatment. Conclusion: Medicare data represent a valid resource for supplementing state cancer registries in surveillance efforts. This potential is especially applicable to cancers predominantly diagnosed and treated outside the hospital setting.",
keywords = "Cancer surveillance, Claims, Incidence, Validation study",
author = "Lynne Penberthy and Donna McClish and Claudine Manning and Sheldon Retchin and Smith, {Thomas J}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/01.mlr.0000167176.41645.c7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "705--712",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The added value of claims for cancer surveillance

T2 - Results of varying case definitions

AU - Penberthy, Lynne

AU - McClish, Donna

AU - Manning, Claudine

AU - Retchin, Sheldon

AU - Smith, Thomas J

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Objective: As cancer diagnosis and treatment has moved to the outpatient Healthcare setting, traditional cancer surveillance tools are less effective for complete and unbiased capture of incident cases. This study evaluates the potential for Medicare data to supplement cancer surveillance in a unique manner by using a standard that is independent of a central cancer registry. Design: State cancer registry records were matched with Medicare data. Case validation included inpatient record abstraction combined with a mail/telephone survey of treating physicians. The positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity (capture rate), and potential additional cases were calculated for 6 Medicare claims-based case definitions. Results: The PPV varied according to cancer site and definition, ranging from 70%-97% (prostate) to 87%-98% (breast). Sensitivity varied inversely with PPV, ranging from 51%-94% (breast) to 10%-88% (lung). The most important factors that predicted being missed by the registry were having no admission to an ACOS-certified hospital and no surgical treatment. Conclusion: Medicare data represent a valid resource for supplementing state cancer registries in surveillance efforts. This potential is especially applicable to cancers predominantly diagnosed and treated outside the hospital setting.

AB - Objective: As cancer diagnosis and treatment has moved to the outpatient Healthcare setting, traditional cancer surveillance tools are less effective for complete and unbiased capture of incident cases. This study evaluates the potential for Medicare data to supplement cancer surveillance in a unique manner by using a standard that is independent of a central cancer registry. Design: State cancer registry records were matched with Medicare data. Case validation included inpatient record abstraction combined with a mail/telephone survey of treating physicians. The positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity (capture rate), and potential additional cases were calculated for 6 Medicare claims-based case definitions. Results: The PPV varied according to cancer site and definition, ranging from 70%-97% (prostate) to 87%-98% (breast). Sensitivity varied inversely with PPV, ranging from 51%-94% (breast) to 10%-88% (lung). The most important factors that predicted being missed by the registry were having no admission to an ACOS-certified hospital and no surgical treatment. Conclusion: Medicare data represent a valid resource for supplementing state cancer registries in surveillance efforts. This potential is especially applicable to cancers predominantly diagnosed and treated outside the hospital setting.

KW - Cancer surveillance

KW - Claims

KW - Incidence

KW - Validation study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22244486992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22244486992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.mlr.0000167176.41645.c7

DO - 10.1097/01.mlr.0000167176.41645.c7

M3 - Article

C2 - 15970786

AN - SCOPUS:22244486992

VL - 43

SP - 705

EP - 712

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 7

ER -