TY - JOUR
T1 - The accuracy of mothers' reports of child vaccination
T2 - evidence from rural Egypt
AU - Langsten, Ray
AU - Hill, Kenneth
N1 - Funding Information:
The data on which the analysis in this paper is based were collected with financial support from USAID through Cooperative Agreement No. DPE-5951-A-00-5051-00 with Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health and through the USAID supported National Control of Diarrheal Diseases Project and the Child Survival Project of the Egypt Ministry of Health. We wish to thank Robert Black for very helpful comments on an earlier draft.
PY - 1998/5/1
Y1 - 1998/5/1
N2 - Abstract-Estimates of immunization coverage in developing countries are typically made on a 'card plus history' basis, combining information obtained from vaccination cards with information from mothers' reports, for children for whom such cards are not available. A recent survey in rural lower Egypt was able to test the accuracy of mothers' reports for a subset of children whose cards were not seen at round 1 of the survey but were seen a year later at round 3. Comparisons of the unsubstantiated reports at round 1 with information recorded from cards seen at round 3 indicate that mothers reports are of very high quality, mothers' reports at round 1 were confirmed by card data at round 3 for between 83 and 93%, depending on vaccine, of children aged 12-23 months, and for 88 to 98% of children aged 24-35 months. Mothers of children who had not been vaccinated were more likely to give consistent responses than were mothers of vaccinated children. Thus, these 'card plus history' estimates slightly understate true coverage levels. Most of the inconsistencies between round 1 and round 3 data apparently arose from interviewer or data processing error rather than from misreporting by mothers.
AB - Abstract-Estimates of immunization coverage in developing countries are typically made on a 'card plus history' basis, combining information obtained from vaccination cards with information from mothers' reports, for children for whom such cards are not available. A recent survey in rural lower Egypt was able to test the accuracy of mothers' reports for a subset of children whose cards were not seen at round 1 of the survey but were seen a year later at round 3. Comparisons of the unsubstantiated reports at round 1 with information recorded from cards seen at round 3 indicate that mothers reports are of very high quality, mothers' reports at round 1 were confirmed by card data at round 3 for between 83 and 93%, depending on vaccine, of children aged 12-23 months, and for 88 to 98% of children aged 24-35 months. Mothers of children who had not been vaccinated were more likely to give consistent responses than were mothers of vaccinated children. Thus, these 'card plus history' estimates slightly understate true coverage levels. Most of the inconsistencies between round 1 and round 3 data apparently arose from interviewer or data processing error rather than from misreporting by mothers.
KW - Child immunization
KW - EPI
KW - Egypt
KW - Vaccination coverage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032079953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032079953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)10049-1
DO - 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)10049-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 9572610
AN - SCOPUS:0032079953
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 46
SP - 1205
EP - 1212
JO - Ethics in Science and Medicine
JF - Ethics in Science and Medicine
IS - 9
ER -