The ACA's pediatric essential health benefit has resulted in a state-by-state patchwork of coverage with exclusions

Aimee M. Grace, Kathleen G. Noonan, Tina L Cheng, Dorothy Miller, Brittany Verga, David Rubin, Sara Rosenbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) establishes essential health benefits as the coverage standard for health plans sold in the individual and small-group markets for all fifty states and the District of Columbia, including the health insurance Marketplaces. "Pediatric services" is one of the required classes of coverage under the ACA. However, other than oral health and vision care, neither the act nor the regulations for implementing it define what these services should be. We investigated how state benchmark plans-the base plan chosen in each state as the standard or benchmark of coverage in that state under ACA rules- address pediatric coverage in plans governed by the essential health benefits standard. Our review of summaries of all the state benchmark plans found that no state specified a distinct pediatric services benefit class. Furthermore, although benchmark plans explicitly included multiple pediatric conditions, many plans also specifically excluded services for children with special health care needs. The Department of Health and Human Services has made a commitment in the essential health benefits regulations to review its approach for the 2016 plan year. Thus, our findings have implications for future regulations regarding the essential health benefits standard for pediatric services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2136-2143
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume33
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Insurance Benefits
Benchmarking
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Pediatrics
Health Insurance Exchanges
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
Delivery of Health Care
Oral Health
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

The ACA's pediatric essential health benefit has resulted in a state-by-state patchwork of coverage with exclusions. / Grace, Aimee M.; Noonan, Kathleen G.; Cheng, Tina L; Miller, Dorothy; Verga, Brittany; Rubin, David; Rosenbaum, Sara.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 33, No. 12, 2014, p. 2136-2143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grace, Aimee M. ; Noonan, Kathleen G. ; Cheng, Tina L ; Miller, Dorothy ; Verga, Brittany ; Rubin, David ; Rosenbaum, Sara. / The ACA's pediatric essential health benefit has resulted in a state-by-state patchwork of coverage with exclusions. In: Health Affairs. 2014 ; Vol. 33, No. 12. pp. 2136-2143.
@article{f1b64d11562e4c9ab8fa7082cccd0ca4,
title = "The ACA's pediatric essential health benefit has resulted in a state-by-state patchwork of coverage with exclusions",
abstract = "The Affordable Care Act (ACA) establishes essential health benefits as the coverage standard for health plans sold in the individual and small-group markets for all fifty states and the District of Columbia, including the health insurance Marketplaces. {"}Pediatric services{"} is one of the required classes of coverage under the ACA. However, other than oral health and vision care, neither the act nor the regulations for implementing it define what these services should be. We investigated how state benchmark plans-the base plan chosen in each state as the standard or benchmark of coverage in that state under ACA rules- address pediatric coverage in plans governed by the essential health benefits standard. Our review of summaries of all the state benchmark plans found that no state specified a distinct pediatric services benefit class. Furthermore, although benchmark plans explicitly included multiple pediatric conditions, many plans also specifically excluded services for children with special health care needs. The Department of Health and Human Services has made a commitment in the essential health benefits regulations to review its approach for the 2016 plan year. Thus, our findings have implications for future regulations regarding the essential health benefits standard for pediatric services.",
author = "Grace, {Aimee M.} and Noonan, {Kathleen G.} and Cheng, {Tina L} and Dorothy Miller and Brittany Verga and David Rubin and Sara Rosenbaum",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0743",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "2136--2143",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ACA's pediatric essential health benefit has resulted in a state-by-state patchwork of coverage with exclusions

AU - Grace, Aimee M.

AU - Noonan, Kathleen G.

AU - Cheng, Tina L

AU - Miller, Dorothy

AU - Verga, Brittany

AU - Rubin, David

AU - Rosenbaum, Sara

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The Affordable Care Act (ACA) establishes essential health benefits as the coverage standard for health plans sold in the individual and small-group markets for all fifty states and the District of Columbia, including the health insurance Marketplaces. "Pediatric services" is one of the required classes of coverage under the ACA. However, other than oral health and vision care, neither the act nor the regulations for implementing it define what these services should be. We investigated how state benchmark plans-the base plan chosen in each state as the standard or benchmark of coverage in that state under ACA rules- address pediatric coverage in plans governed by the essential health benefits standard. Our review of summaries of all the state benchmark plans found that no state specified a distinct pediatric services benefit class. Furthermore, although benchmark plans explicitly included multiple pediatric conditions, many plans also specifically excluded services for children with special health care needs. The Department of Health and Human Services has made a commitment in the essential health benefits regulations to review its approach for the 2016 plan year. Thus, our findings have implications for future regulations regarding the essential health benefits standard for pediatric services.

AB - The Affordable Care Act (ACA) establishes essential health benefits as the coverage standard for health plans sold in the individual and small-group markets for all fifty states and the District of Columbia, including the health insurance Marketplaces. "Pediatric services" is one of the required classes of coverage under the ACA. However, other than oral health and vision care, neither the act nor the regulations for implementing it define what these services should be. We investigated how state benchmark plans-the base plan chosen in each state as the standard or benchmark of coverage in that state under ACA rules- address pediatric coverage in plans governed by the essential health benefits standard. Our review of summaries of all the state benchmark plans found that no state specified a distinct pediatric services benefit class. Furthermore, although benchmark plans explicitly included multiple pediatric conditions, many plans also specifically excluded services for children with special health care needs. The Department of Health and Human Services has made a commitment in the essential health benefits regulations to review its approach for the 2016 plan year. Thus, our findings have implications for future regulations regarding the essential health benefits standard for pediatric services.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916931512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916931512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0743

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0743

M3 - Article

C2 - 25489031

AN - SCOPUS:84916931512

VL - 33

SP - 2136

EP - 2143

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 12

ER -