Text processing by digital voice recognition

Gerrit A. Meijer, Jan P A Baak, Paul J. Van Diest, Alexander H. Van Hattum, Hans C. Van Der Linden, Jose J M Koevoets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate digital voice recognition in free text mode. STUDY DESIGN: A standard medical text (182 words and punctuation marks) was dictated four times each by six people using a commercially available voice recognition system. RESULTS: The time used, including the time needed for making corrections, decreased from a median of 14.5 (6.3-18.8) minutes in the first session to a median of 6.7 (5.1-15.7) in the fourth session. The number of corrections necessary in the last session was a median of 20.5 (15-97)- i.e., 11% of the number of words in the text. All users described working with the system as highly strenuous. Dictating the same text with a dictaphone took median 1.4 (0.9-1.6) minutes and about five minutes of typing and correction time. CONCLUSION: Although the total time was about the same with the two methods, the time for the pathologist increased fourfold when using the voice recognition system. To obtain acceptable input speed, an appropriate template module is essential.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-266
Number of pages6
JournalAnalytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology
Volume18
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pathologists

Keywords

  • text processing
  • voice
  • voice recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Histology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Meijer, G. A., Baak, J. P. A., Van Diest, P. J., Van Hattum, A. H., Van Der Linden, H. C., & Koevoets, J. J. M. (1996). Text processing by digital voice recognition. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, 18(4), 261-266.

Text processing by digital voice recognition. / Meijer, Gerrit A.; Baak, Jan P A; Van Diest, Paul J.; Van Hattum, Alexander H.; Van Der Linden, Hans C.; Koevoets, Jose J M.

In: Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 08.1996, p. 261-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meijer, GA, Baak, JPA, Van Diest, PJ, Van Hattum, AH, Van Der Linden, HC & Koevoets, JJM 1996, 'Text processing by digital voice recognition', Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 261-266.
Meijer GA, Baak JPA, Van Diest PJ, Van Hattum AH, Van Der Linden HC, Koevoets JJM. Text processing by digital voice recognition. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology. 1996 Aug;18(4):261-266.
Meijer, Gerrit A. ; Baak, Jan P A ; Van Diest, Paul J. ; Van Hattum, Alexander H. ; Van Der Linden, Hans C. ; Koevoets, Jose J M. / Text processing by digital voice recognition. In: Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology. 1996 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 261-266.
@article{7507059e13214c3f8e0343ad51f40ae2,
title = "Text processing by digital voice recognition",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate digital voice recognition in free text mode. STUDY DESIGN: A standard medical text (182 words and punctuation marks) was dictated four times each by six people using a commercially available voice recognition system. RESULTS: The time used, including the time needed for making corrections, decreased from a median of 14.5 (6.3-18.8) minutes in the first session to a median of 6.7 (5.1-15.7) in the fourth session. The number of corrections necessary in the last session was a median of 20.5 (15-97)- i.e., 11{\%} of the number of words in the text. All users described working with the system as highly strenuous. Dictating the same text with a dictaphone took median 1.4 (0.9-1.6) minutes and about five minutes of typing and correction time. CONCLUSION: Although the total time was about the same with the two methods, the time for the pathologist increased fourfold when using the voice recognition system. To obtain acceptable input speed, an appropriate template module is essential.",
keywords = "text processing, voice, voice recognition",
author = "Meijer, {Gerrit A.} and Baak, {Jan P A} and {Van Diest}, {Paul J.} and {Van Hattum}, {Alexander H.} and {Van Der Linden}, {Hans C.} and Koevoets, {Jose J M}",
year = "1996",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "261--266",
journal = "Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology",
issn = "0301-102X",
publisher = "John Rylands University Library",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Text processing by digital voice recognition

AU - Meijer, Gerrit A.

AU - Baak, Jan P A

AU - Van Diest, Paul J.

AU - Van Hattum, Alexander H.

AU - Van Der Linden, Hans C.

AU - Koevoets, Jose J M

PY - 1996/8

Y1 - 1996/8

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate digital voice recognition in free text mode. STUDY DESIGN: A standard medical text (182 words and punctuation marks) was dictated four times each by six people using a commercially available voice recognition system. RESULTS: The time used, including the time needed for making corrections, decreased from a median of 14.5 (6.3-18.8) minutes in the first session to a median of 6.7 (5.1-15.7) in the fourth session. The number of corrections necessary in the last session was a median of 20.5 (15-97)- i.e., 11% of the number of words in the text. All users described working with the system as highly strenuous. Dictating the same text with a dictaphone took median 1.4 (0.9-1.6) minutes and about five minutes of typing and correction time. CONCLUSION: Although the total time was about the same with the two methods, the time for the pathologist increased fourfold when using the voice recognition system. To obtain acceptable input speed, an appropriate template module is essential.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate digital voice recognition in free text mode. STUDY DESIGN: A standard medical text (182 words and punctuation marks) was dictated four times each by six people using a commercially available voice recognition system. RESULTS: The time used, including the time needed for making corrections, decreased from a median of 14.5 (6.3-18.8) minutes in the first session to a median of 6.7 (5.1-15.7) in the fourth session. The number of corrections necessary in the last session was a median of 20.5 (15-97)- i.e., 11% of the number of words in the text. All users described working with the system as highly strenuous. Dictating the same text with a dictaphone took median 1.4 (0.9-1.6) minutes and about five minutes of typing and correction time. CONCLUSION: Although the total time was about the same with the two methods, the time for the pathologist increased fourfold when using the voice recognition system. To obtain acceptable input speed, an appropriate template module is essential.

KW - text processing

KW - voice

KW - voice recognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029836862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029836862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 261

EP - 266

JO - Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology

JF - Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology

SN - 0301-102X

IS - 4

ER -