Testing the hospital value proposition

An empirical analysis of efficiency and quality

Timothy R. Huerta, Eric W. Ford, Lori T. Peterson, Keith H. Brigham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purposes: To assess the relationship between hospitals' X-inefficiency levels and overall care quality based on the National Quality Forum's 27 safe practices score and to improve the analytic strategy for assessing X-inefficiency. Methodology: The 2005 versions of the American Hospital Association and Leapfrog Group's annual surveys were the basis of the study. Additional case mix indices and market variables were drawn from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data sources and the Area Resource File. Data envelopment analysis was used to determine hospitals' X-inefficiency scores relative to their market-level competitors. Regression was used to assess the relationship between X-inefficiency and quality, controlling for organizational and market characteristics. Expenses (total and labor expenditures), case-mix-adjusted admissions, length of stay, and licensed beds defined the X-inefficiency function. The overall National Quality Forum's safe practice score, health maintenance organization penetration, market share, and teaching status served as independent control variables in the regression. Findings: The National Quality Forum's safe practice scores are significantly and positively correlated to hospital X-inefficiency levels (β = .105, p ≤ .05). The analysis of the value proposition had very good explanatory power (adjusted R = .414; p ≤ .001; df = 7, 265). Contrary to earlier findings, health maintenance organization penetration and being a teaching hospital were positively related to X-inefficiency. Similar with others' findings, greater market share and for-profit ownership were negatively associated with X-inefficiency. Practice Implications: Measurement of overall hospital quality is improving but can still be made better. Nevertheless, the National Quality Forum's measure is significantly related to efficiency and could be used to create differential pay-for-performance programs. A market-segmented analytic strategy for studying hospitals' efficiency yields results with a high degree of explanatory power.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-349
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Care Management Review
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Maintenance Organizations
Diagnosis-Related Groups
American Hospital Association
Incentive Reimbursement
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Ownership
Quality of Health Care
Information Storage and Retrieval
Health Expenditures
Teaching Hospitals
Length of Stay
Teaching
Value proposition
Empirical analysis
X-inefficiency
Testing
Health maintenance organizations
Case mix
Penetration
Market share

Keywords

  • Hospitals
  • Organizational efficiency
  • Quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Leadership and Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Testing the hospital value proposition : An empirical analysis of efficiency and quality. / Huerta, Timothy R.; Ford, Eric W.; Peterson, Lori T.; Brigham, Keith H.

In: Health Care Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, 10.2008, p. 341-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huerta, Timothy R. ; Ford, Eric W. ; Peterson, Lori T. ; Brigham, Keith H. / Testing the hospital value proposition : An empirical analysis of efficiency and quality. In: Health Care Management Review. 2008 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 341-349.
@article{45cdc0e98e244bf4a35ccebb511d7c7e,
title = "Testing the hospital value proposition: An empirical analysis of efficiency and quality",
abstract = "Purposes: To assess the relationship between hospitals' X-inefficiency levels and overall care quality based on the National Quality Forum's 27 safe practices score and to improve the analytic strategy for assessing X-inefficiency. Methodology: The 2005 versions of the American Hospital Association and Leapfrog Group's annual surveys were the basis of the study. Additional case mix indices and market variables were drawn from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data sources and the Area Resource File. Data envelopment analysis was used to determine hospitals' X-inefficiency scores relative to their market-level competitors. Regression was used to assess the relationship between X-inefficiency and quality, controlling for organizational and market characteristics. Expenses (total and labor expenditures), case-mix-adjusted admissions, length of stay, and licensed beds defined the X-inefficiency function. The overall National Quality Forum's safe practice score, health maintenance organization penetration, market share, and teaching status served as independent control variables in the regression. Findings: The National Quality Forum's safe practice scores are significantly and positively correlated to hospital X-inefficiency levels (β = .105, p ≤ .05). The analysis of the value proposition had very good explanatory power (adjusted R = .414; p ≤ .001; df = 7, 265). Contrary to earlier findings, health maintenance organization penetration and being a teaching hospital were positively related to X-inefficiency. Similar with others' findings, greater market share and for-profit ownership were negatively associated with X-inefficiency. Practice Implications: Measurement of overall hospital quality is improving but can still be made better. Nevertheless, the National Quality Forum's measure is significantly related to efficiency and could be used to create differential pay-for-performance programs. A market-segmented analytic strategy for studying hospitals' efficiency yields results with a high degree of explanatory power.",
keywords = "Hospitals, Organizational efficiency, Quality",
author = "Huerta, {Timothy R.} and Ford, {Eric W.} and Peterson, {Lori T.} and Brigham, {Keith H.}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/01.HCM.0000318770.82642.c6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "341--349",
journal = "Health Care Management Review",
issn = "0361-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the hospital value proposition

T2 - An empirical analysis of efficiency and quality

AU - Huerta, Timothy R.

AU - Ford, Eric W.

AU - Peterson, Lori T.

AU - Brigham, Keith H.

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Purposes: To assess the relationship between hospitals' X-inefficiency levels and overall care quality based on the National Quality Forum's 27 safe practices score and to improve the analytic strategy for assessing X-inefficiency. Methodology: The 2005 versions of the American Hospital Association and Leapfrog Group's annual surveys were the basis of the study. Additional case mix indices and market variables were drawn from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data sources and the Area Resource File. Data envelopment analysis was used to determine hospitals' X-inefficiency scores relative to their market-level competitors. Regression was used to assess the relationship between X-inefficiency and quality, controlling for organizational and market characteristics. Expenses (total and labor expenditures), case-mix-adjusted admissions, length of stay, and licensed beds defined the X-inefficiency function. The overall National Quality Forum's safe practice score, health maintenance organization penetration, market share, and teaching status served as independent control variables in the regression. Findings: The National Quality Forum's safe practice scores are significantly and positively correlated to hospital X-inefficiency levels (β = .105, p ≤ .05). The analysis of the value proposition had very good explanatory power (adjusted R = .414; p ≤ .001; df = 7, 265). Contrary to earlier findings, health maintenance organization penetration and being a teaching hospital were positively related to X-inefficiency. Similar with others' findings, greater market share and for-profit ownership were negatively associated with X-inefficiency. Practice Implications: Measurement of overall hospital quality is improving but can still be made better. Nevertheless, the National Quality Forum's measure is significantly related to efficiency and could be used to create differential pay-for-performance programs. A market-segmented analytic strategy for studying hospitals' efficiency yields results with a high degree of explanatory power.

AB - Purposes: To assess the relationship between hospitals' X-inefficiency levels and overall care quality based on the National Quality Forum's 27 safe practices score and to improve the analytic strategy for assessing X-inefficiency. Methodology: The 2005 versions of the American Hospital Association and Leapfrog Group's annual surveys were the basis of the study. Additional case mix indices and market variables were drawn from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data sources and the Area Resource File. Data envelopment analysis was used to determine hospitals' X-inefficiency scores relative to their market-level competitors. Regression was used to assess the relationship between X-inefficiency and quality, controlling for organizational and market characteristics. Expenses (total and labor expenditures), case-mix-adjusted admissions, length of stay, and licensed beds defined the X-inefficiency function. The overall National Quality Forum's safe practice score, health maintenance organization penetration, market share, and teaching status served as independent control variables in the regression. Findings: The National Quality Forum's safe practice scores are significantly and positively correlated to hospital X-inefficiency levels (β = .105, p ≤ .05). The analysis of the value proposition had very good explanatory power (adjusted R = .414; p ≤ .001; df = 7, 265). Contrary to earlier findings, health maintenance organization penetration and being a teaching hospital were positively related to X-inefficiency. Similar with others' findings, greater market share and for-profit ownership were negatively associated with X-inefficiency. Practice Implications: Measurement of overall hospital quality is improving but can still be made better. Nevertheless, the National Quality Forum's measure is significantly related to efficiency and could be used to create differential pay-for-performance programs. A market-segmented analytic strategy for studying hospitals' efficiency yields results with a high degree of explanatory power.

KW - Hospitals

KW - Organizational efficiency

KW - Quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55549111230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55549111230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.HCM.0000318770.82642.c6

DO - 10.1097/01.HCM.0000318770.82642.c6

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 341

EP - 349

JO - Health Care Management Review

JF - Health Care Management Review

SN - 0361-6274

IS - 4

ER -