Testing for statistical discrimination by race/ethnicity in panel data for depression treatment in primary care

Thomas G. McGuire, John Z. Ayanian, Daniel E Ford, Rachel E M Henke, Kathryn M. Rost, Alan M. Zaslavsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. To test for discrimination by race/ethnicity arising from clinical uncertainty in treatment for depression, also known as "statistical discrimination." Data Sources. We used survey data from 1,321 African-American, Hispanic, and white adults identified with depression in primary care. Surveys were administered every six months for two years in the Quality Improvement for Depression (QID) studies. Study Design. To examine whether and how change in depression severity affects change in treatment intensity by race/ethnicity, we used multivariate cross-sectional and change models that difference out unobserved time-invariant patient characteristics potentially correlated with race/ethnicity. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Treatment intensity was operationalized as expenditures on drugs, primary care, and specialty services, weighted by national prices from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Patient race/ethnicity was collected at baseline by self-report. Principal Findings. Change in depression severity is less associated with change in treatment intensity in minority patients than in whites, consistent with the hypothesis of statistical discrimination. The differential effect by racial/ethnic group was accounted for by use of mental health specialists. Conclusions. Enhanced physician-patient communication and use of standardized depression instruments may reduce statistical discrimination arising from clinical uncertainty and be useful in reducing racial/ethnic inequities in depression treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-551
Number of pages21
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
discrimination
ethnicity
Depression
Health Expenditures
Therapeutics
Uncertainty
expenditures
uncertainty
Information Storage and Retrieval
Quality Improvement
Hispanic Americans
Ethnic Groups
African Americans
Self Report
Mental Health
ethnic group
mental health
Communication
physician

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Racial/ethnic disparities
  • Statistical discrimination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Testing for statistical discrimination by race/ethnicity in panel data for depression treatment in primary care. / McGuire, Thomas G.; Ayanian, John Z.; Ford, Daniel E; Henke, Rachel E M; Rost, Kathryn M.; Zaslavsky, Alan M.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 43, No. 2, 04.2008, p. 531-551.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McGuire, Thomas G. ; Ayanian, John Z. ; Ford, Daniel E ; Henke, Rachel E M ; Rost, Kathryn M. ; Zaslavsky, Alan M. / Testing for statistical discrimination by race/ethnicity in panel data for depression treatment in primary care. In: Health Services Research. 2008 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 531-551.
@article{eb91ed3909b24c0f89807900eb93dbc5,
title = "Testing for statistical discrimination by race/ethnicity in panel data for depression treatment in primary care",
abstract = "Objective. To test for discrimination by race/ethnicity arising from clinical uncertainty in treatment for depression, also known as {"}statistical discrimination.{"} Data Sources. We used survey data from 1,321 African-American, Hispanic, and white adults identified with depression in primary care. Surveys were administered every six months for two years in the Quality Improvement for Depression (QID) studies. Study Design. To examine whether and how change in depression severity affects change in treatment intensity by race/ethnicity, we used multivariate cross-sectional and change models that difference out unobserved time-invariant patient characteristics potentially correlated with race/ethnicity. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Treatment intensity was operationalized as expenditures on drugs, primary care, and specialty services, weighted by national prices from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Patient race/ethnicity was collected at baseline by self-report. Principal Findings. Change in depression severity is less associated with change in treatment intensity in minority patients than in whites, consistent with the hypothesis of statistical discrimination. The differential effect by racial/ethnic group was accounted for by use of mental health specialists. Conclusions. Enhanced physician-patient communication and use of standardized depression instruments may reduce statistical discrimination arising from clinical uncertainty and be useful in reducing racial/ethnic inequities in depression treatment.",
keywords = "Depression, Racial/ethnic disparities, Statistical discrimination",
author = "McGuire, {Thomas G.} and Ayanian, {John Z.} and Ford, {Daniel E} and Henke, {Rachel E M} and Rost, {Kathryn M.} and Zaslavsky, {Alan M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00770.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "531--551",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing for statistical discrimination by race/ethnicity in panel data for depression treatment in primary care

AU - McGuire, Thomas G.

AU - Ayanian, John Z.

AU - Ford, Daniel E

AU - Henke, Rachel E M

AU - Rost, Kathryn M.

AU - Zaslavsky, Alan M.

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Objective. To test for discrimination by race/ethnicity arising from clinical uncertainty in treatment for depression, also known as "statistical discrimination." Data Sources. We used survey data from 1,321 African-American, Hispanic, and white adults identified with depression in primary care. Surveys were administered every six months for two years in the Quality Improvement for Depression (QID) studies. Study Design. To examine whether and how change in depression severity affects change in treatment intensity by race/ethnicity, we used multivariate cross-sectional and change models that difference out unobserved time-invariant patient characteristics potentially correlated with race/ethnicity. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Treatment intensity was operationalized as expenditures on drugs, primary care, and specialty services, weighted by national prices from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Patient race/ethnicity was collected at baseline by self-report. Principal Findings. Change in depression severity is less associated with change in treatment intensity in minority patients than in whites, consistent with the hypothesis of statistical discrimination. The differential effect by racial/ethnic group was accounted for by use of mental health specialists. Conclusions. Enhanced physician-patient communication and use of standardized depression instruments may reduce statistical discrimination arising from clinical uncertainty and be useful in reducing racial/ethnic inequities in depression treatment.

AB - Objective. To test for discrimination by race/ethnicity arising from clinical uncertainty in treatment for depression, also known as "statistical discrimination." Data Sources. We used survey data from 1,321 African-American, Hispanic, and white adults identified with depression in primary care. Surveys were administered every six months for two years in the Quality Improvement for Depression (QID) studies. Study Design. To examine whether and how change in depression severity affects change in treatment intensity by race/ethnicity, we used multivariate cross-sectional and change models that difference out unobserved time-invariant patient characteristics potentially correlated with race/ethnicity. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Treatment intensity was operationalized as expenditures on drugs, primary care, and specialty services, weighted by national prices from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Patient race/ethnicity was collected at baseline by self-report. Principal Findings. Change in depression severity is less associated with change in treatment intensity in minority patients than in whites, consistent with the hypothesis of statistical discrimination. The differential effect by racial/ethnic group was accounted for by use of mental health specialists. Conclusions. Enhanced physician-patient communication and use of standardized depression instruments may reduce statistical discrimination arising from clinical uncertainty and be useful in reducing racial/ethnic inequities in depression treatment.

KW - Depression

KW - Racial/ethnic disparities

KW - Statistical discrimination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149099431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41149099431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00770.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00770.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18370966

AN - SCOPUS:41149099431

VL - 43

SP - 531

EP - 551

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 2

ER -