Test-retest reliability of the Capute scales for neurodevelopmental screening of a high risk sample: Impact of test-retest interval and degree of neonatal risk

M. McCurdy, A. Bellows, D. Deng, M. Leppert, E. Mahone, A. Pritchard

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

AIM: Reliable and valid screening and assessment tools are necessary to identify children at risk for neurodevelopmental disabilities who may require additional services. This study evaluated the test-retest reliability of the Capute Scales in a high-risk sample, hypothesizing adequate reliability across 6- and 12-month intervals. METHODS: Capute Scales scores (N= 66) were collected via retrospective chart review from a NICU follow-up clinic within a large urban medical center spanning three age-ranges: 12-18, 19-24, and 25-36 months. On average, participants were classified as very low birth weight and premature. Reliability of the Capute Scales was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients across length of test-retest interval, age at testing, and degree of neonatal complications. RESULTS: The Capute Scales demonstrated high reliability, regardless of length of test-retest interval (ranging from 6 to 14 months) or age of participant, for all index scores, including overall Developmental Quotient (DQ), language-based skill index (CLAMS) and nonverbal reasoning index (CAT). Linear regressions revealed that greater neonatal risk was related to poorer test-retest reliability; however, reliability coefficients remained strong. CONCLUSIONS: The Capute Scales afford clinicians a reliable and valid means of screening and assessing for neurodevelopmental delay within high-risk infant populations.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages233-241
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 24 2015

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Very Low Birth Weight Infant
Linear Models
Language
Population

Keywords

  • CAT/CLAMS
  • developmental screener
  • neonatology
  • Prematurity
  • psychometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

@article{c3dfad98319346ec8e3a8f67f2ecf823,
title = "Test-retest reliability of the Capute scales for neurodevelopmental screening of a high risk sample: Impact of test-retest interval and degree of neonatal risk",
abstract = "AIM: Reliable and valid screening and assessment tools are necessary to identify children at risk for neurodevelopmental disabilities who may require additional services. This study evaluated the test-retest reliability of the Capute Scales in a high-risk sample, hypothesizing adequate reliability across 6- and 12-month intervals. METHODS: Capute Scales scores (N= 66) were collected via retrospective chart review from a NICU follow-up clinic within a large urban medical center spanning three age-ranges: 12-18, 19-24, and 25-36 months. On average, participants were classified as very low birth weight and premature. Reliability of the Capute Scales was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients across length of test-retest interval, age at testing, and degree of neonatal complications. RESULTS: The Capute Scales demonstrated high reliability, regardless of length of test-retest interval (ranging from 6 to 14 months) or age of participant, for all index scores, including overall Developmental Quotient (DQ), language-based skill index (CLAMS) and nonverbal reasoning index (CAT). Linear regressions revealed that greater neonatal risk was related to poorer test-retest reliability; however, reliability coefficients remained strong. CONCLUSIONS: The Capute Scales afford clinicians a reliable and valid means of screening and assessing for neurodevelopmental delay within high-risk infant populations.",
keywords = "CAT/CLAMS, developmental screener, neonatology, Prematurity, psychometrics",
author = "M. McCurdy and A. Bellows and D. Deng and M. Leppert and E. Mahone and A. Pritchard",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
doi = "10.3233/NPM-15814118",
volume = "8",
pages = "233--241",
journal = "Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine",
issn = "1934-5798",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test-retest reliability of the Capute scales for neurodevelopmental screening of a high risk sample

T2 - Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine

AU - McCurdy,M.

AU - Bellows,A.

AU - Deng,D.

AU - Leppert,M.

AU - Mahone,E.

AU - Pritchard,A.

PY - 2015/10/24

Y1 - 2015/10/24

N2 - AIM: Reliable and valid screening and assessment tools are necessary to identify children at risk for neurodevelopmental disabilities who may require additional services. This study evaluated the test-retest reliability of the Capute Scales in a high-risk sample, hypothesizing adequate reliability across 6- and 12-month intervals. METHODS: Capute Scales scores (N= 66) were collected via retrospective chart review from a NICU follow-up clinic within a large urban medical center spanning three age-ranges: 12-18, 19-24, and 25-36 months. On average, participants were classified as very low birth weight and premature. Reliability of the Capute Scales was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients across length of test-retest interval, age at testing, and degree of neonatal complications. RESULTS: The Capute Scales demonstrated high reliability, regardless of length of test-retest interval (ranging from 6 to 14 months) or age of participant, for all index scores, including overall Developmental Quotient (DQ), language-based skill index (CLAMS) and nonverbal reasoning index (CAT). Linear regressions revealed that greater neonatal risk was related to poorer test-retest reliability; however, reliability coefficients remained strong. CONCLUSIONS: The Capute Scales afford clinicians a reliable and valid means of screening and assessing for neurodevelopmental delay within high-risk infant populations.

AB - AIM: Reliable and valid screening and assessment tools are necessary to identify children at risk for neurodevelopmental disabilities who may require additional services. This study evaluated the test-retest reliability of the Capute Scales in a high-risk sample, hypothesizing adequate reliability across 6- and 12-month intervals. METHODS: Capute Scales scores (N= 66) were collected via retrospective chart review from a NICU follow-up clinic within a large urban medical center spanning three age-ranges: 12-18, 19-24, and 25-36 months. On average, participants were classified as very low birth weight and premature. Reliability of the Capute Scales was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients across length of test-retest interval, age at testing, and degree of neonatal complications. RESULTS: The Capute Scales demonstrated high reliability, regardless of length of test-retest interval (ranging from 6 to 14 months) or age of participant, for all index scores, including overall Developmental Quotient (DQ), language-based skill index (CLAMS) and nonverbal reasoning index (CAT). Linear regressions revealed that greater neonatal risk was related to poorer test-retest reliability; however, reliability coefficients remained strong. CONCLUSIONS: The Capute Scales afford clinicians a reliable and valid means of screening and assessing for neurodevelopmental delay within high-risk infant populations.

KW - CAT/CLAMS

KW - developmental screener

KW - neonatology

KW - Prematurity

KW - psychometrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946573167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946573167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/NPM-15814118

DO - 10.3233/NPM-15814118

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 233

EP - 241

JO - Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine

SN - 1934-5798

IS - 3

ER -