TY - JOUR
T1 - Tenofovir resistance in early and long-term treated patients on first-line antiretroviral therapy in eight low-income and middle-income countries
AU - for the Acquired HIV Drug Resistance Survey Team
AU - Inzaule, Seth C.
AU - Jordan, Michael R.
AU - Cournil, Amandine
AU - Giron-Callejas, Amalia
AU - Avila-Rios, Santiango
AU - Mulenga, Lloyd
AU - Ssemwanga, Deogratius
AU - Asio, Juliet
AU - Diop-Ndiaye, Halimatou
AU - Niasse-Traore, Fatou
AU - Nhan, Do T.
AU - Dat, Vu Q.
AU - Aghokeng, Avelin F.
AU - Billong, Serge
AU - Cham, Fatim
AU - Doherty, Meg
AU - Bertagnolio, Silvia
AU - Thiam, Safiatou
AU - Ndour, Chekh Tidiane
AU - Toure-Kane, Coumba
AU - Fall, Mengue
AU - Diouf, Nafissatou Leye
AU - Diakhaby, Mba Elhadji Bambo
AU - Boye, Cheikh Saad Bouh
AU - Rodriguez, Edith
AU - Carolina, Sandra
AU - Sierra, Tomasa
AU - Ravasi, Giovanni
AU - Lopez, Andrea
AU - Estrada, Claudia
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for these surveys was provided by the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Global Fund and countries’ ministry of health.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Objective: We aimed to assess the frequency of tenofovir (TDF) resistance in people failing tenofovir/lamivudine or emtricitabine (XTC)/nonnucleotide reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-based first-line antiretroviral treatment (ART) using data from 15 nationally representative surveys of HIV drug resistance conducted between 2014 and 2018 in Cameroon, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Senegal, Uganda, Vietnam and Zambia. Methods: Prevalence of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor resistance among participants with virological nonsuppression (viral load ≥1000 copies/ml) who had received TDF-based ART for 12 – 24 months (early ART group) and at least 40 months (long-term ART group) was assessed using Sanger sequencing and resistance was interpreted using the Stanford HIVdb algorithm. For each group, we estimated a pooled prevalence using random effect meta-analysis. Results: Of 4677 participants enrolled in the surveys, 640 (13.7%) had virological nonsuppression, 431 (67.3%) were successfully genotyped and were included in the analysis; of those, 60.3% (260) were participants in the early ART group. Overall, 39.1, 57.9, 38.5 and 3.6% patients in the early ART group and 42.9, 69.3, 42.9 and 10.0% patients on long-term ART had resistance to TDF, XTC, TDF þ XTC and TDF þ XTC þ zizidovudine, respectively. Overall, tenofovir resistance was mainly due to K65R or K70E/ G/N/A/S/T/Y115F mutations (79%) but also due to thymidine analogue mutations (21%) which arise from exposure to thymidine analogues but causing cross-resistance to TDF. Conclusion: Dual resistance to TDF þ XTC occurred in more than 40% of the people with viral nonsuppression receiving tenofovir-based first-line ART, supporting WHO recommendation to optimize the nucleoside backbone in second-line treatment and cautioning against single drug substitutions in people with unsuppressed viral load.
AB - Objective: We aimed to assess the frequency of tenofovir (TDF) resistance in people failing tenofovir/lamivudine or emtricitabine (XTC)/nonnucleotide reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-based first-line antiretroviral treatment (ART) using data from 15 nationally representative surveys of HIV drug resistance conducted between 2014 and 2018 in Cameroon, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Senegal, Uganda, Vietnam and Zambia. Methods: Prevalence of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor resistance among participants with virological nonsuppression (viral load ≥1000 copies/ml) who had received TDF-based ART for 12 – 24 months (early ART group) and at least 40 months (long-term ART group) was assessed using Sanger sequencing and resistance was interpreted using the Stanford HIVdb algorithm. For each group, we estimated a pooled prevalence using random effect meta-analysis. Results: Of 4677 participants enrolled in the surveys, 640 (13.7%) had virological nonsuppression, 431 (67.3%) were successfully genotyped and were included in the analysis; of those, 60.3% (260) were participants in the early ART group. Overall, 39.1, 57.9, 38.5 and 3.6% patients in the early ART group and 42.9, 69.3, 42.9 and 10.0% patients on long-term ART had resistance to TDF, XTC, TDF þ XTC and TDF þ XTC þ zizidovudine, respectively. Overall, tenofovir resistance was mainly due to K65R or K70E/ G/N/A/S/T/Y115F mutations (79%) but also due to thymidine analogue mutations (21%) which arise from exposure to thymidine analogues but causing cross-resistance to TDF. Conclusion: Dual resistance to TDF þ XTC occurred in more than 40% of the people with viral nonsuppression receiving tenofovir-based first-line ART, supporting WHO recommendation to optimize the nucleoside backbone in second-line treatment and cautioning against single drug substitutions in people with unsuppressed viral load.
KW - Early vs. late virological failure
KW - HIV drug resistance
KW - Low-income and middle-income countries
KW - Tenofovir-based first-line HIV treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092681621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092681621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002623
DO - 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002623
M3 - Article
C2 - 32694410
AN - SCOPUS:85092681621
SN - 0269-9370
VL - 34
SP - 1965
EP - 1969
JO - AIDS
JF - AIDS
IS - 13
ER -