Telephone support to rural and remote patients with heart failure: The chronic heart failure assessment by telephone (CHAT) study

Henry Krum, Andrew Forbes, Julie Yallop, Andrea Driscoll, Jo Croucher, Bianca Chan, Robyn Clark, Patricia M Davidson, Luan Huynh, Edward K Kasper, David Hunt, Helen Egan, Simon Stewart, Leon Piterman, Andrew Tonkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Summary: Background: Heart failure (HF) remains a condition with high morbidity and mortality. We tested a telephone support strategy to reduce major events in rural and remote Australians with HF, who have limited healthcare access. Telephone support comprised an interactive telecommunication software tool (TeleWatch) with follow-up by trained cardiac nurses. Methods: Patients with a general practice (GP) diagnosis of HF were randomized to usual care (UC) or UC and telephone support intervention (UC+I) using a cluster design involving 143 GPs throughout Australia. Patients were followed up for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the Packer clinical composite score. Secondary endpoints included hospitalization for any cause, death or hospitalization, as well as HF hospitalization. Results: Four hundred and five patients were randomized to CHAT. Patients were well matched at baseline for key demographic variables. The primary endpoint of the Packer score was not different between the two groups (P = 0.98), although more patients improved with UC+I. There were fewer patients hospitalized for any cause (74 vs. 114, adjusted HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.50-0.89], P = 0.006) and who died or were hospitalized (89 vs. 124, adjusted HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.53-0.92], P = 0.011), in the UC+I vs. UC group. HF hospitalizations were reduced with UC+I (23 vs. 35, adjusted HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.44-1.38]), although this was not significant (P = 0.43). There were 16 deaths in the UC group and 17 in the UC+I group (P = 0.43). Conclusions: Although no difference was observed in the primary endpoint of CHAT (Packer composite score), UC+I significantly reduced the number of HF patients hospitalized among a rural and remote cohort. These data suggest that telephone support may be an efficacious approach to improve clinical outcomes in rural and remote HF patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)230-237
Number of pages8
JournalCardiovascular Therapeutics
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Telephone
Heart Failure
Hospitalization
Telecommunications
General Practice
Cause of Death
Software
Nurses
Demography
Morbidity
Delivery of Health Care
Mortality

Keywords

  • Heart failure
  • Remote monitoring
  • Rural patients
  • Telemonitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Telephone support to rural and remote patients with heart failure : The chronic heart failure assessment by telephone (CHAT) study. / Krum, Henry; Forbes, Andrew; Yallop, Julie; Driscoll, Andrea; Croucher, Jo; Chan, Bianca; Clark, Robyn; Davidson, Patricia M; Huynh, Luan; Kasper, Edward K; Hunt, David; Egan, Helen; Stewart, Simon; Piterman, Leon; Tonkin, Andrew.

In: Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Vol. 31, No. 4, 08.2013, p. 230-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krum, H, Forbes, A, Yallop, J, Driscoll, A, Croucher, J, Chan, B, Clark, R, Davidson, PM, Huynh, L, Kasper, EK, Hunt, D, Egan, H, Stewart, S, Piterman, L & Tonkin, A 2013, 'Telephone support to rural and remote patients with heart failure: The chronic heart failure assessment by telephone (CHAT) study', Cardiovascular Therapeutics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 230-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-5922.12009
Krum, Henry ; Forbes, Andrew ; Yallop, Julie ; Driscoll, Andrea ; Croucher, Jo ; Chan, Bianca ; Clark, Robyn ; Davidson, Patricia M ; Huynh, Luan ; Kasper, Edward K ; Hunt, David ; Egan, Helen ; Stewart, Simon ; Piterman, Leon ; Tonkin, Andrew. / Telephone support to rural and remote patients with heart failure : The chronic heart failure assessment by telephone (CHAT) study. In: Cardiovascular Therapeutics. 2013 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 230-237.
@article{c560556fe613440f98cb493184cf7334,
title = "Telephone support to rural and remote patients with heart failure: The chronic heart failure assessment by telephone (CHAT) study",
abstract = "Summary: Background: Heart failure (HF) remains a condition with high morbidity and mortality. We tested a telephone support strategy to reduce major events in rural and remote Australians with HF, who have limited healthcare access. Telephone support comprised an interactive telecommunication software tool (TeleWatch) with follow-up by trained cardiac nurses. Methods: Patients with a general practice (GP) diagnosis of HF were randomized to usual care (UC) or UC and telephone support intervention (UC+I) using a cluster design involving 143 GPs throughout Australia. Patients were followed up for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the Packer clinical composite score. Secondary endpoints included hospitalization for any cause, death or hospitalization, as well as HF hospitalization. Results: Four hundred and five patients were randomized to CHAT. Patients were well matched at baseline for key demographic variables. The primary endpoint of the Packer score was not different between the two groups (P = 0.98), although more patients improved with UC+I. There were fewer patients hospitalized for any cause (74 vs. 114, adjusted HR 0.67 [95{\%} CI 0.50-0.89], P = 0.006) and who died or were hospitalized (89 vs. 124, adjusted HR 0.70 [95{\%} CI 0.53-0.92], P = 0.011), in the UC+I vs. UC group. HF hospitalizations were reduced with UC+I (23 vs. 35, adjusted HR 0.81 [95{\%} CI 0.44-1.38]), although this was not significant (P = 0.43). There were 16 deaths in the UC group and 17 in the UC+I group (P = 0.43). Conclusions: Although no difference was observed in the primary endpoint of CHAT (Packer composite score), UC+I significantly reduced the number of HF patients hospitalized among a rural and remote cohort. These data suggest that telephone support may be an efficacious approach to improve clinical outcomes in rural and remote HF patients.",
keywords = "Heart failure, Remote monitoring, Rural patients, Telemonitoring",
author = "Henry Krum and Andrew Forbes and Julie Yallop and Andrea Driscoll and Jo Croucher and Bianca Chan and Robyn Clark and Davidson, {Patricia M} and Luan Huynh and Kasper, {Edward K} and David Hunt and Helen Egan and Simon Stewart and Leon Piterman and Andrew Tonkin",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/1755-5922.12009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "230--237",
journal = "Cardiovascular Therapeutics",
issn = "1755-5914",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Telephone support to rural and remote patients with heart failure

T2 - The chronic heart failure assessment by telephone (CHAT) study

AU - Krum, Henry

AU - Forbes, Andrew

AU - Yallop, Julie

AU - Driscoll, Andrea

AU - Croucher, Jo

AU - Chan, Bianca

AU - Clark, Robyn

AU - Davidson, Patricia M

AU - Huynh, Luan

AU - Kasper, Edward K

AU - Hunt, David

AU - Egan, Helen

AU - Stewart, Simon

AU - Piterman, Leon

AU - Tonkin, Andrew

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Summary: Background: Heart failure (HF) remains a condition with high morbidity and mortality. We tested a telephone support strategy to reduce major events in rural and remote Australians with HF, who have limited healthcare access. Telephone support comprised an interactive telecommunication software tool (TeleWatch) with follow-up by trained cardiac nurses. Methods: Patients with a general practice (GP) diagnosis of HF were randomized to usual care (UC) or UC and telephone support intervention (UC+I) using a cluster design involving 143 GPs throughout Australia. Patients were followed up for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the Packer clinical composite score. Secondary endpoints included hospitalization for any cause, death or hospitalization, as well as HF hospitalization. Results: Four hundred and five patients were randomized to CHAT. Patients were well matched at baseline for key demographic variables. The primary endpoint of the Packer score was not different between the two groups (P = 0.98), although more patients improved with UC+I. There were fewer patients hospitalized for any cause (74 vs. 114, adjusted HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.50-0.89], P = 0.006) and who died or were hospitalized (89 vs. 124, adjusted HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.53-0.92], P = 0.011), in the UC+I vs. UC group. HF hospitalizations were reduced with UC+I (23 vs. 35, adjusted HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.44-1.38]), although this was not significant (P = 0.43). There were 16 deaths in the UC group and 17 in the UC+I group (P = 0.43). Conclusions: Although no difference was observed in the primary endpoint of CHAT (Packer composite score), UC+I significantly reduced the number of HF patients hospitalized among a rural and remote cohort. These data suggest that telephone support may be an efficacious approach to improve clinical outcomes in rural and remote HF patients.

AB - Summary: Background: Heart failure (HF) remains a condition with high morbidity and mortality. We tested a telephone support strategy to reduce major events in rural and remote Australians with HF, who have limited healthcare access. Telephone support comprised an interactive telecommunication software tool (TeleWatch) with follow-up by trained cardiac nurses. Methods: Patients with a general practice (GP) diagnosis of HF were randomized to usual care (UC) or UC and telephone support intervention (UC+I) using a cluster design involving 143 GPs throughout Australia. Patients were followed up for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the Packer clinical composite score. Secondary endpoints included hospitalization for any cause, death or hospitalization, as well as HF hospitalization. Results: Four hundred and five patients were randomized to CHAT. Patients were well matched at baseline for key demographic variables. The primary endpoint of the Packer score was not different between the two groups (P = 0.98), although more patients improved with UC+I. There were fewer patients hospitalized for any cause (74 vs. 114, adjusted HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.50-0.89], P = 0.006) and who died or were hospitalized (89 vs. 124, adjusted HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.53-0.92], P = 0.011), in the UC+I vs. UC group. HF hospitalizations were reduced with UC+I (23 vs. 35, adjusted HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.44-1.38]), although this was not significant (P = 0.43). There were 16 deaths in the UC group and 17 in the UC+I group (P = 0.43). Conclusions: Although no difference was observed in the primary endpoint of CHAT (Packer composite score), UC+I significantly reduced the number of HF patients hospitalized among a rural and remote cohort. These data suggest that telephone support may be an efficacious approach to improve clinical outcomes in rural and remote HF patients.

KW - Heart failure

KW - Remote monitoring

KW - Rural patients

KW - Telemonitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880655108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880655108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1755-5922.12009

DO - 10.1111/1755-5922.12009

M3 - Article

C2 - 23061492

AN - SCOPUS:84880655108

VL - 31

SP - 230

EP - 237

JO - Cardiovascular Therapeutics

JF - Cardiovascular Therapeutics

SN - 1755-5914

IS - 4

ER -