TY - JOUR
T1 - Technology insight
T2 - Telementoring and telesurgery in urology
AU - Challacombe, Ben
AU - Kavoussi, Louis
AU - Patriciu, Alexandru
AU - Stoianovici, Dan
AU - Dasgupta, Prokar
PY - 2006/11/1
Y1 - 2006/11/1
N2 - The rapid expansion of the field of minimally invasive surgery has been accompanied by a number of controversies. These novel surgical techniques offer benefits to the patient with regard to length of hospital stay, return to full activity, and cosmesis; also, they are often more cost-effective than open procedures. On the other hand, they are technically demanding, have a significant learning curve, and can be associated with high initial complication rates unless performed by experienced endoscopic surgeons. Telemedicine, which uses real-time video and information transfer, offers the potential to increase the availability of minimally invasive surgery through video-assisted surgery and through remote instruction. At present, remote communities, especially those within developed countries, can most immediately benefit from telesurgical approaches. Enthusiasm must be tempered by the issues of cost, security, surgeon liability and availability of the technology itself which have yet to be fully resolved. In this Review, the field of telemedicine, focusing specifically on telementoring and telesurgery, and its relevance to urology are discussed. From early experimental work to current clinical usage, the advantages of and problems in this evolving field are explored.
AB - The rapid expansion of the field of minimally invasive surgery has been accompanied by a number of controversies. These novel surgical techniques offer benefits to the patient with regard to length of hospital stay, return to full activity, and cosmesis; also, they are often more cost-effective than open procedures. On the other hand, they are technically demanding, have a significant learning curve, and can be associated with high initial complication rates unless performed by experienced endoscopic surgeons. Telemedicine, which uses real-time video and information transfer, offers the potential to increase the availability of minimally invasive surgery through video-assisted surgery and through remote instruction. At present, remote communities, especially those within developed countries, can most immediately benefit from telesurgical approaches. Enthusiasm must be tempered by the issues of cost, security, surgeon liability and availability of the technology itself which have yet to be fully resolved. In this Review, the field of telemedicine, focusing specifically on telementoring and telesurgery, and its relevance to urology are discussed. From early experimental work to current clinical usage, the advantages of and problems in this evolving field are explored.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750736026&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750736026&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/ncpuro0626
DO - 10.1038/ncpuro0626
M3 - Review article
C2 - 17088929
AN - SCOPUS:33750736026
SN - 1743-4270
VL - 3
SP - 611
EP - 617
JO - Nature Clinical Practice Urology
JF - Nature Clinical Practice Urology
IS - 11
ER -