Technical aspects of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration CHEST guideline and expert panel report

Momen M. Wahidi, Felix Herth, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Ray Wesley Shepherd, Lonny Yarmus, Mohit Chawla, Carla Lamb, Kenneth R. Casey, Sheena Patel, Gerard A. Silvestri, David Feller-Kopman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) was introduced in the last decade, enabling real-time guidance of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of mediastinal and hilar structures and parabronchial lungmasses. Themany publications produced about EBUS-TBNA have led to a better understanding of the performance characteristics of this procedure. The goal of this document was to examine the current literature on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA as they relate to patient, technology, and proceduralist factors to provide evidence-based and expert guidance to clinicians. METHODS: Rigorous methodology has been applied to provide a trustworthy evidence-based guideline and expert panel report. A group of approved panelists developed key clinical questions by using the PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) format that addressed specific topics on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion, and well-recognized document evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract meaningful data, and to grade the level of evidence to support each recommendation or suggestion. RESULTS: Our systematic review and critical analysis of the literature on 15 PICO questions related to the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA resulted in 12 statements: 7 evidence-based graded recommendations and 5 ungraded consensus-based statements. Three questions did not have sufficient evidence to generate a statement. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA varies in strength but is satisfactory in certain areas to guide clinicians on the best conditions to perform EBUSguided tissue sampling. Additional research is needed to enhance our knowledge regarding the optimal performance of this effective procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)816-835
Number of pages20
JournalChest
Volume149
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Needles
Guidelines
PubMed
MEDLINE
Population
Libraries
Publications
Technology
Research

Keywords

  • Endobronchial ultrasound
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Guidelines
  • Transbronchial needle aspiration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Technical aspects of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration CHEST guideline and expert panel report. / Wahidi, Momen M.; Herth, Felix; Yasufuku, Kazuhiro; Shepherd, Ray Wesley; Yarmus, Lonny; Chawla, Mohit; Lamb, Carla; Casey, Kenneth R.; Patel, Sheena; Silvestri, Gerard A.; Feller-Kopman, David.

In: Chest, Vol. 149, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 816-835.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wahidi, MM, Herth, F, Yasufuku, K, Shepherd, RW, Yarmus, L, Chawla, M, Lamb, C, Casey, KR, Patel, S, Silvestri, GA & Feller-Kopman, D 2016, 'Technical aspects of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration CHEST guideline and expert panel report', Chest, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 816-835. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.15-1216
Wahidi, Momen M. ; Herth, Felix ; Yasufuku, Kazuhiro ; Shepherd, Ray Wesley ; Yarmus, Lonny ; Chawla, Mohit ; Lamb, Carla ; Casey, Kenneth R. ; Patel, Sheena ; Silvestri, Gerard A. ; Feller-Kopman, David. / Technical aspects of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration CHEST guideline and expert panel report. In: Chest. 2016 ; Vol. 149, No. 3. pp. 816-835.
@article{1acef1f44e6c40e4918d0940bd0ab855,
title = "Technical aspects of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration CHEST guideline and expert panel report",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) was introduced in the last decade, enabling real-time guidance of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of mediastinal and hilar structures and parabronchial lungmasses. Themany publications produced about EBUS-TBNA have led to a better understanding of the performance characteristics of this procedure. The goal of this document was to examine the current literature on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA as they relate to patient, technology, and proceduralist factors to provide evidence-based and expert guidance to clinicians. METHODS: Rigorous methodology has been applied to provide a trustworthy evidence-based guideline and expert panel report. A group of approved panelists developed key clinical questions by using the PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) format that addressed specific topics on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion, and well-recognized document evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract meaningful data, and to grade the level of evidence to support each recommendation or suggestion. RESULTS: Our systematic review and critical analysis of the literature on 15 PICO questions related to the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA resulted in 12 statements: 7 evidence-based graded recommendations and 5 ungraded consensus-based statements. Three questions did not have sufficient evidence to generate a statement. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA varies in strength but is satisfactory in certain areas to guide clinicians on the best conditions to perform EBUSguided tissue sampling. Additional research is needed to enhance our knowledge regarding the optimal performance of this effective procedure.",
keywords = "Endobronchial ultrasound, Evidence-based medicine, Guidelines, Transbronchial needle aspiration",
author = "Wahidi, {Momen M.} and Felix Herth and Kazuhiro Yasufuku and Shepherd, {Ray Wesley} and Lonny Yarmus and Mohit Chawla and Carla Lamb and Casey, {Kenneth R.} and Sheena Patel and Silvestri, {Gerard A.} and David Feller-Kopman",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1378/chest.15-1216",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "149",
pages = "816--835",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technical aspects of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration CHEST guideline and expert panel report

AU - Wahidi, Momen M.

AU - Herth, Felix

AU - Yasufuku, Kazuhiro

AU - Shepherd, Ray Wesley

AU - Yarmus, Lonny

AU - Chawla, Mohit

AU - Lamb, Carla

AU - Casey, Kenneth R.

AU - Patel, Sheena

AU - Silvestri, Gerard A.

AU - Feller-Kopman, David

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) was introduced in the last decade, enabling real-time guidance of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of mediastinal and hilar structures and parabronchial lungmasses. Themany publications produced about EBUS-TBNA have led to a better understanding of the performance characteristics of this procedure. The goal of this document was to examine the current literature on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA as they relate to patient, technology, and proceduralist factors to provide evidence-based and expert guidance to clinicians. METHODS: Rigorous methodology has been applied to provide a trustworthy evidence-based guideline and expert panel report. A group of approved panelists developed key clinical questions by using the PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) format that addressed specific topics on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion, and well-recognized document evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract meaningful data, and to grade the level of evidence to support each recommendation or suggestion. RESULTS: Our systematic review and critical analysis of the literature on 15 PICO questions related to the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA resulted in 12 statements: 7 evidence-based graded recommendations and 5 ungraded consensus-based statements. Three questions did not have sufficient evidence to generate a statement. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA varies in strength but is satisfactory in certain areas to guide clinicians on the best conditions to perform EBUSguided tissue sampling. Additional research is needed to enhance our knowledge regarding the optimal performance of this effective procedure.

AB - BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) was introduced in the last decade, enabling real-time guidance of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of mediastinal and hilar structures and parabronchial lungmasses. Themany publications produced about EBUS-TBNA have led to a better understanding of the performance characteristics of this procedure. The goal of this document was to examine the current literature on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA as they relate to patient, technology, and proceduralist factors to provide evidence-based and expert guidance to clinicians. METHODS: Rigorous methodology has been applied to provide a trustworthy evidence-based guideline and expert panel report. A group of approved panelists developed key clinical questions by using the PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) format that addressed specific topics on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion, and well-recognized document evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract meaningful data, and to grade the level of evidence to support each recommendation or suggestion. RESULTS: Our systematic review and critical analysis of the literature on 15 PICO questions related to the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA resulted in 12 statements: 7 evidence-based graded recommendations and 5 ungraded consensus-based statements. Three questions did not have sufficient evidence to generate a statement. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA varies in strength but is satisfactory in certain areas to guide clinicians on the best conditions to perform EBUSguided tissue sampling. Additional research is needed to enhance our knowledge regarding the optimal performance of this effective procedure.

KW - Endobronchial ultrasound

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Guidelines

KW - Transbronchial needle aspiration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960358508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960358508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.15-1216

DO - 10.1378/chest.15-1216

M3 - Article

VL - 149

SP - 816

EP - 835

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 3

ER -