Team-based model for non-operating room airway management: Validation using a simulation-based study

S. Demaria, D. J. Berman, A. Goldberg, H. M. Lin, Y. Khelemsky, A. I. Levine, T. Asai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Background Non-operating room (non-OR) airway management has previously been identified as an area of concern because it carries a significant risk for complications. One reason for this could be attributed to the independent practice of residents in these situations. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether differences in performance exist between residents working alone vs with a resident partner when encountering simulated non-OR airway management scenarios. Methods Thirty-six anaesthesia residents were randomized into two groups. Each group experienced three separate scenarios (two scenarios initially and then a third 6 weeks later). The scenarios consisted of one control scenario and two critical event scenarios [i.e. asystole during laryngoscopy and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) upon post-intubation institution of positive pressure ventilation]. One group experienced the simulated non-OR scenarios alone (Solo group). The other group consisted of resident pairs, participating in the same three scenarios (Team group). Results Although the time to intubation did not differ between the Solo and Team groups, there were several differences in performance. The Team group received better overall performance ratings for the asystole (8.5 vs 5.5 out of 10; P<0.001) and PEA (8.5 vs 5.8 out of 10; P<0.001) scenarios. The Team group was also able to recognize asystole and PEA conditions faster than the Solo group [10.1 vs 23.5 s (P<0.001) and 13.3 vs 36.0 s (P<0.001), respectively]. Conclusions Residents who performed a simulated intubation with a second trained provider had better overall performance than those who practised independently. The residents who practised in a group were also faster to diagnose serious complications, including peri-intubation asystole and PEA. Given these data, it is reasonable that training programmes consider performing all non-OR airway management with a team-based method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-108
Number of pages6
JournalBritish journal of anaesthesia
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016
Externally publishedYes


  • Airway management
  • High-fidelity simulation
  • Team-based anaesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Team-based model for non-operating room airway management: Validation using a simulation-based study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this