Taming the White Bear: Initial Costs and Eventual Benefits of Distractor Inhibition

Corbin A. Cunningham, Howard E Egeth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous research indicates that prior information about a target feature, such as its color, can speed search. Can search also be speeded by knowing what a target will not look like? In the two experiments reported here, participants searched for target letters. Prior to viewing search displays, participants were prompted either with the color in which one or more nontarget letters would appear (ignore trials) or with no information about the search display (neutral trials). Critically, when participants were given one consistent color to ignore for the duration of the experiment, compared with when they were given no information, there was a cost in reaction time (RT) early in the experiment. However, after extended practice, RTs on ignore trials were significantly faster than RTs on neutral trials, which provides a novel demonstration that knowledge about nontargets can improve search performance for targets. When the to-be-ignored color changed from trial to trial, no RT benefit was observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)476-485
Number of pages10
JournalPsychological Science
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Ursidae
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Color
Reaction Time
Costs and Cost Analysis
Inhibition (Psychology)
Research

Keywords

  • attention
  • inhibition
  • perceptual learning
  • visual search

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Taming the White Bear : Initial Costs and Eventual Benefits of Distractor Inhibition. / Cunningham, Corbin A.; Egeth, Howard E.

In: Psychological Science, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2016, p. 476-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8077af08582495f85e2915e7eeb2493,
title = "Taming the White Bear: Initial Costs and Eventual Benefits of Distractor Inhibition",
abstract = "Previous research indicates that prior information about a target feature, such as its color, can speed search. Can search also be speeded by knowing what a target will not look like? In the two experiments reported here, participants searched for target letters. Prior to viewing search displays, participants were prompted either with the color in which one or more nontarget letters would appear (ignore trials) or with no information about the search display (neutral trials). Critically, when participants were given one consistent color to ignore for the duration of the experiment, compared with when they were given no information, there was a cost in reaction time (RT) early in the experiment. However, after extended practice, RTs on ignore trials were significantly faster than RTs on neutral trials, which provides a novel demonstration that knowledge about nontargets can improve search performance for targets. When the to-be-ignored color changed from trial to trial, no RT benefit was observed.",
keywords = "attention, inhibition, perceptual learning, visual search",
author = "Cunningham, {Corbin A.} and Egeth, {Howard E}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/0956797615626564",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "476--485",
journal = "Psychological Science",
issn = "0956-7976",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taming the White Bear

T2 - Initial Costs and Eventual Benefits of Distractor Inhibition

AU - Cunningham, Corbin A.

AU - Egeth, Howard E

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Previous research indicates that prior information about a target feature, such as its color, can speed search. Can search also be speeded by knowing what a target will not look like? In the two experiments reported here, participants searched for target letters. Prior to viewing search displays, participants were prompted either with the color in which one or more nontarget letters would appear (ignore trials) or with no information about the search display (neutral trials). Critically, when participants were given one consistent color to ignore for the duration of the experiment, compared with when they were given no information, there was a cost in reaction time (RT) early in the experiment. However, after extended practice, RTs on ignore trials were significantly faster than RTs on neutral trials, which provides a novel demonstration that knowledge about nontargets can improve search performance for targets. When the to-be-ignored color changed from trial to trial, no RT benefit was observed.

AB - Previous research indicates that prior information about a target feature, such as its color, can speed search. Can search also be speeded by knowing what a target will not look like? In the two experiments reported here, participants searched for target letters. Prior to viewing search displays, participants were prompted either with the color in which one or more nontarget letters would appear (ignore trials) or with no information about the search display (neutral trials). Critically, when participants were given one consistent color to ignore for the duration of the experiment, compared with when they were given no information, there was a cost in reaction time (RT) early in the experiment. However, after extended practice, RTs on ignore trials were significantly faster than RTs on neutral trials, which provides a novel demonstration that knowledge about nontargets can improve search performance for targets. When the to-be-ignored color changed from trial to trial, no RT benefit was observed.

KW - attention

KW - inhibition

KW - perceptual learning

KW - visual search

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963653999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963653999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0956797615626564

DO - 10.1177/0956797615626564

M3 - Article

C2 - 26893292

AN - SCOPUS:84963653999

VL - 27

SP - 476

EP - 485

JO - Psychological Science

JF - Psychological Science

SN - 0956-7976

IS - 4

ER -