Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of hospital competition on quality of care

Implications for senior care

Vivien Chia Ying Shen, William J Ward, Liang Kung Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Empirical studies examined the associations between hospital competition and quality of care by using different methodology, measures, patient groups and geographic locations; however, results remained inconclusive. This study aimed to apply meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of hospital competition on quality of care and to explore the potential implications to care for senior patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis combining results from various studies to obtain an overall outcome was performed. Measure of effect size, I 2 test, meta-regression to find sources of heterogeneity, tests for publication bias, sensitivity analysis and cumulative analysis were performed. The mean effect size is estimated by coefficient and standard error with P values less than 0.05 which was considered statistically significant. Results: Based on the selection criteria, only 11 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled effect of hospital competition on quality of care was reported by all of the 11 included studies. Results of the meta-analysis suggested that hospital competition reduced quality of care, but the overall effect was relatively insignificant from a statistical perspective (Point estimate = 0.008, 95% CI = -0.004 ˜ 0.020, P > 0.05). Conclusions: Hospital competition slightly increased mortality rates of acute myocardial infarction, but not statistically significant. The negative impact may be lessened over time as medical technology, practices, and techniques improve. Older patients with complex care needs may be at risk for poorer quality of care related to hospital competition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-270
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Volume83
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Meta-Analysis
Publication Bias
Geographic Locations
medical technology
Patient Selection
Patient Care
Myocardial Infarction
Technology
mortality
Mortality
regression
methodology
trend
Values

Keywords

  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Elderly
  • Hospital competition
  • Meta-analysis
  • Quality of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Aging
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of hospital competition on quality of care : Implications for senior care. / Shen, Vivien Chia Ying; Ward, William J; Chen, Liang Kung.

In: Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Vol. 83, 01.07.2019, p. 263-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fb848cb86bb44bf19077872ec8e6f21e,
title = "Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of hospital competition on quality of care: Implications for senior care",
abstract = "Background: Empirical studies examined the associations between hospital competition and quality of care by using different methodology, measures, patient groups and geographic locations; however, results remained inconclusive. This study aimed to apply meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of hospital competition on quality of care and to explore the potential implications to care for senior patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis combining results from various studies to obtain an overall outcome was performed. Measure of effect size, I 2 test, meta-regression to find sources of heterogeneity, tests for publication bias, sensitivity analysis and cumulative analysis were performed. The mean effect size is estimated by coefficient and standard error with P values less than 0.05 which was considered statistically significant. Results: Based on the selection criteria, only 11 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled effect of hospital competition on quality of care was reported by all of the 11 included studies. Results of the meta-analysis suggested that hospital competition reduced quality of care, but the overall effect was relatively insignificant from a statistical perspective (Point estimate = 0.008, 95{\%} CI = -0.004 ˜ 0.020, P > 0.05). Conclusions: Hospital competition slightly increased mortality rates of acute myocardial infarction, but not statistically significant. The negative impact may be lessened over time as medical technology, practices, and techniques improve. Older patients with complex care needs may be at risk for poorer quality of care related to hospital competition.",
keywords = "Acute myocardial infarction, Elderly, Hospital competition, Meta-analysis, Quality of care",
author = "Shen, {Vivien Chia Ying} and Ward, {William J} and Chen, {Liang Kung}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.archger.2019.05.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "263--270",
journal = "Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics",
issn = "0167-4943",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of hospital competition on quality of care

T2 - Implications for senior care

AU - Shen, Vivien Chia Ying

AU - Ward, William J

AU - Chen, Liang Kung

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Background: Empirical studies examined the associations between hospital competition and quality of care by using different methodology, measures, patient groups and geographic locations; however, results remained inconclusive. This study aimed to apply meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of hospital competition on quality of care and to explore the potential implications to care for senior patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis combining results from various studies to obtain an overall outcome was performed. Measure of effect size, I 2 test, meta-regression to find sources of heterogeneity, tests for publication bias, sensitivity analysis and cumulative analysis were performed. The mean effect size is estimated by coefficient and standard error with P values less than 0.05 which was considered statistically significant. Results: Based on the selection criteria, only 11 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled effect of hospital competition on quality of care was reported by all of the 11 included studies. Results of the meta-analysis suggested that hospital competition reduced quality of care, but the overall effect was relatively insignificant from a statistical perspective (Point estimate = 0.008, 95% CI = -0.004 ˜ 0.020, P > 0.05). Conclusions: Hospital competition slightly increased mortality rates of acute myocardial infarction, but not statistically significant. The negative impact may be lessened over time as medical technology, practices, and techniques improve. Older patients with complex care needs may be at risk for poorer quality of care related to hospital competition.

AB - Background: Empirical studies examined the associations between hospital competition and quality of care by using different methodology, measures, patient groups and geographic locations; however, results remained inconclusive. This study aimed to apply meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of hospital competition on quality of care and to explore the potential implications to care for senior patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis combining results from various studies to obtain an overall outcome was performed. Measure of effect size, I 2 test, meta-regression to find sources of heterogeneity, tests for publication bias, sensitivity analysis and cumulative analysis were performed. The mean effect size is estimated by coefficient and standard error with P values less than 0.05 which was considered statistically significant. Results: Based on the selection criteria, only 11 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled effect of hospital competition on quality of care was reported by all of the 11 included studies. Results of the meta-analysis suggested that hospital competition reduced quality of care, but the overall effect was relatively insignificant from a statistical perspective (Point estimate = 0.008, 95% CI = -0.004 ˜ 0.020, P > 0.05). Conclusions: Hospital competition slightly increased mortality rates of acute myocardial infarction, but not statistically significant. The negative impact may be lessened over time as medical technology, practices, and techniques improve. Older patients with complex care needs may be at risk for poorer quality of care related to hospital competition.

KW - Acute myocardial infarction

KW - Elderly

KW - Hospital competition

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Quality of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065574964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065574964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.archger.2019.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.archger.2019.05.001

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 263

EP - 270

JO - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

JF - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

SN - 0167-4943

ER -