Symptom profiles of depression among general medical service users compared with speciality mental health service users

Tongwoo Suh, Joseph J Gallo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. Since depressive disorders are now eminently treatable and early detection and treatment could bring substantial benefits, it is critical to address alternative presentations of depression in the general medical setting. Concern regarding under-diagnosis of depression in general medical settings has given rise to the question of whether the clinical disorder of depression differs qualitatively or only quantitatively across care settings. Methods. Symptom profiles of depression were compared across care sectors to investigate how the presentation of depression among general medical service users might differ qualitatively from speciality mental health service users. Data on depression symptoms within 6 months of interview gathered in three community surveys that were part of the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program were analysed using methods developed to assess item bias. The subjects were 4931 and 363 persons who reported a visit to the general medical sector or to speciality mental health respectively, within 6 months of interview. Results. Compared with speciality mental health service users, general medical service users were less likely to present dysphoria (adjusted Odds Ratio, aOR = 0.57; 95% Confidence Interval, CI = 0.38-0.84) and feeling worthless, sinful, or guilty (aOR = 0.63; 95% CI =0.40-0.98),but were more likely to present fatigue (aOR = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.09-2.69), even after holding constant other characteristics that might influence reporting of symptoms as well as level of depression. Conclusions. These results suggest that there are qualitative differences in depression presenting in general medical care compared with speciality mental health care and call for a reconceptualization of depression in the general medical setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1051-1063
Number of pages13
JournalPsychological Medicine
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1997

Fingerprint

Mental Health Services
Depression
Mental Health
Interviews
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Depressive Disorder
Fatigue
Emotions
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Symptom profiles of depression among general medical service users compared with speciality mental health service users. / Suh, Tongwoo; Gallo, Joseph J.

In: Psychological Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 5, 09.1997, p. 1051-1063.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b39170c5ac44043a9b57884c5698a53,
title = "Symptom profiles of depression among general medical service users compared with speciality mental health service users",
abstract = "Background. Since depressive disorders are now eminently treatable and early detection and treatment could bring substantial benefits, it is critical to address alternative presentations of depression in the general medical setting. Concern regarding under-diagnosis of depression in general medical settings has given rise to the question of whether the clinical disorder of depression differs qualitatively or only quantitatively across care settings. Methods. Symptom profiles of depression were compared across care sectors to investigate how the presentation of depression among general medical service users might differ qualitatively from speciality mental health service users. Data on depression symptoms within 6 months of interview gathered in three community surveys that were part of the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program were analysed using methods developed to assess item bias. The subjects were 4931 and 363 persons who reported a visit to the general medical sector or to speciality mental health respectively, within 6 months of interview. Results. Compared with speciality mental health service users, general medical service users were less likely to present dysphoria (adjusted Odds Ratio, aOR = 0.57; 95{\%} Confidence Interval, CI = 0.38-0.84) and feeling worthless, sinful, or guilty (aOR = 0.63; 95{\%} CI =0.40-0.98),but were more likely to present fatigue (aOR = 1.71; 95{\%} CI = 1.09-2.69), even after holding constant other characteristics that might influence reporting of symptoms as well as level of depression. Conclusions. These results suggest that there are qualitative differences in depression presenting in general medical care compared with speciality mental health care and call for a reconceptualization of depression in the general medical setting.",
author = "Tongwoo Suh and Gallo, {Joseph J}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1017/S0033291797005205",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1051--1063",
journal = "Psychological Medicine",
issn = "0033-2917",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Symptom profiles of depression among general medical service users compared with speciality mental health service users

AU - Suh, Tongwoo

AU - Gallo, Joseph J

PY - 1997/9

Y1 - 1997/9

N2 - Background. Since depressive disorders are now eminently treatable and early detection and treatment could bring substantial benefits, it is critical to address alternative presentations of depression in the general medical setting. Concern regarding under-diagnosis of depression in general medical settings has given rise to the question of whether the clinical disorder of depression differs qualitatively or only quantitatively across care settings. Methods. Symptom profiles of depression were compared across care sectors to investigate how the presentation of depression among general medical service users might differ qualitatively from speciality mental health service users. Data on depression symptoms within 6 months of interview gathered in three community surveys that were part of the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program were analysed using methods developed to assess item bias. The subjects were 4931 and 363 persons who reported a visit to the general medical sector or to speciality mental health respectively, within 6 months of interview. Results. Compared with speciality mental health service users, general medical service users were less likely to present dysphoria (adjusted Odds Ratio, aOR = 0.57; 95% Confidence Interval, CI = 0.38-0.84) and feeling worthless, sinful, or guilty (aOR = 0.63; 95% CI =0.40-0.98),but were more likely to present fatigue (aOR = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.09-2.69), even after holding constant other characteristics that might influence reporting of symptoms as well as level of depression. Conclusions. These results suggest that there are qualitative differences in depression presenting in general medical care compared with speciality mental health care and call for a reconceptualization of depression in the general medical setting.

AB - Background. Since depressive disorders are now eminently treatable and early detection and treatment could bring substantial benefits, it is critical to address alternative presentations of depression in the general medical setting. Concern regarding under-diagnosis of depression in general medical settings has given rise to the question of whether the clinical disorder of depression differs qualitatively or only quantitatively across care settings. Methods. Symptom profiles of depression were compared across care sectors to investigate how the presentation of depression among general medical service users might differ qualitatively from speciality mental health service users. Data on depression symptoms within 6 months of interview gathered in three community surveys that were part of the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program were analysed using methods developed to assess item bias. The subjects were 4931 and 363 persons who reported a visit to the general medical sector or to speciality mental health respectively, within 6 months of interview. Results. Compared with speciality mental health service users, general medical service users were less likely to present dysphoria (adjusted Odds Ratio, aOR = 0.57; 95% Confidence Interval, CI = 0.38-0.84) and feeling worthless, sinful, or guilty (aOR = 0.63; 95% CI =0.40-0.98),but were more likely to present fatigue (aOR = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.09-2.69), even after holding constant other characteristics that might influence reporting of symptoms as well as level of depression. Conclusions. These results suggest that there are qualitative differences in depression presenting in general medical care compared with speciality mental health care and call for a reconceptualization of depression in the general medical setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030819527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030819527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0033291797005205

DO - 10.1017/S0033291797005205

M3 - Article

C2 - 9300511

AN - SCOPUS:0030819527

VL - 27

SP - 1051

EP - 1063

JO - Psychological Medicine

JF - Psychological Medicine

SN - 0033-2917

IS - 5

ER -