TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustained use of liquefied petroleum gas following one year of free fuel and behavioral support in Puno, Peru
AU - Cardiopulmonary outcomes and Household Air Pollution trial investigators
AU - Williams, Kendra N.
AU - Kephart, Josiah L.
AU - Fandiño-Del-Rio, Magdalena
AU - Nicolaou, Laura
AU - Koehler, Kirsten
AU - Harvey, Steven A.
AU - Checkley, William
N1 - Funding Information:
The CHAP trial received ethical approval from Johns Hopkins School of Public Health Institutional Review Board (IRB00007128), A.B. PRISMA Ethical Institutional Committee (CE2402.16), and Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia Institutional Review Board (SIDISI 66780). The authors would like to thank Phabiola Herrera and Shakir Hossen (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA), the field staff from A.B. PRISMA, and the study participants in Puno, Peru. The research reported in this publication was supported by the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) through the following institutes and centers: Fogarty International Center, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Cancer Institute, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under award numbers U01TW010107 and U2RTW010114 (Multiple Principal Investigators [MPIs]: Checkley, Gonzales, Naeher, Steenland). This trial was additionally supported in part by the Clean Cooking Alliance of the United Nations Foundation UNF-16-810 (Principal Investigator: Checkley). K.N.W. and J.L.K. were supported by NIH Research Training Grant D43TW009340 (MPIs: Buekens, Checkley, Chi, Kondwani) funded by the NIH through the following institutes and centers: Fogarty International Center, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Mental Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. J.L.K. K.N.W. and M.F.-D.-R. were supported by a Global Established Multidisciplinary Sites award from the Center for Global Health at Johns Hopkins University (PI: Checkley). J.L.K. was further supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the NIH under Award Number T32ES007141 (PI: Wills-Karp). K.N.W. was further supported by the NHLBI of the NIH under Award Number T32HL007534 (PI: Wise). M.F.-D.-R. was further supported by the David Leslie Swift Fund of the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University. Our Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training field center in Puno, Peru, also received generous support from Mr. William and Bonnie Clarke III and the COPD Discovery Award from Johns Hopkins University.
Funding Information:
The research reported in this publication was supported by the United States National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) through the following institutes and centers: Fogarty International Center , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , National Cancer Institute , and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under award numbers U01TW010107 and U2RTW010114 (Multiple Principal Investigators [MPIs]: Checkley, Gonzales, Naeher, Steenland). This trial was additionally supported in part by the Clean Cooking Alliance of the United Nations Foundation UNF-16-810 (Principal Investigator: Checkley). K.N.W. and J.L.K. were supported by NIH Research Training Grant D43TW009340 (MPIs: Buekens, Checkley, Chi, Kondwani) funded by the NIH through the following institutes and centers: Fogarty International Center , National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke , National Institute of Mental Health , National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute , and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences . J.L.K., K.N.W., and M.F.-D.-R. were supported by a Global Established Multidisciplinary Sites award from the Center for Global Health at Johns Hopkins University (PI: Checkley). J.L.K. was further supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the NIH under Award Number T32ES007141 (PI: Wills-Karp). K.N.W. was further supported by the NHLBI of the NIH under Award Number T32HL007534 (PI: Wise). M.F.-D.-R. was further supported by the David Leslie Swift Fund of the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University . Our Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training field center in Puno, Peru, also received generous support from Mr. William and Bonnie Clarke III and the COPD Discovery Award from Johns Hopkins University .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 International Energy Initiative
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Background: Existing efforts to promote cleaner fuels have not achieved exclusive use. We investigated whether receiving 12 months of free liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and behavioral support could motivate continued purchase and use. Methods: The Cardiopulmonary outcomes and Household Air Pollution (CHAP) trial enrolled 180 women. Half were randomly assigned to an intervention group, which included free LPG delivered in months 1–12 followed by a post-intervention period in which they no longer received free fuel (months 13–24). For the purposes of comparison, we also include months 1–12 of data from control participants. We tracked stove use with temperature monitors, surveys, and observations, and conducted in-depth interviews with 19 participants from the intervention group at the end of their post-intervention period. Results: Participants from the intervention group used their LPG stove for 85.4 % of monitored days and 63.2 % of cooking minutes during the post-intervention months (13–24) when they were not receiving free fuel from the trial. They used a traditional stove (fogón) on 45.1 % of days post-intervention, which is significantly lower than fogón use by control participants during the intervention period (72.2 % of days). In months 13–24 post-intervention, participants from the intervention group purchased on average 12.3 kg and spent 34.1 soles (10.3 USD) per month on LPG. Continued LPG use was higher among participants who said they could afford two tanks of LPG per month, did not cook for animals, and removed their traditional stove. Women described that becoming accustomed to LPG, support and training from the project, consistent LPG supply, choice between LPG providers, and access to delivery services facilitated sustained LPG use. However, high cost was a major barrier to exclusive use. Conclusion: A 12-month period of intensive LPG support achieved a high level of sustained LPG use post-intervention, but other strategies are needed to sustain exclusive use.
AB - Background: Existing efforts to promote cleaner fuels have not achieved exclusive use. We investigated whether receiving 12 months of free liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and behavioral support could motivate continued purchase and use. Methods: The Cardiopulmonary outcomes and Household Air Pollution (CHAP) trial enrolled 180 women. Half were randomly assigned to an intervention group, which included free LPG delivered in months 1–12 followed by a post-intervention period in which they no longer received free fuel (months 13–24). For the purposes of comparison, we also include months 1–12 of data from control participants. We tracked stove use with temperature monitors, surveys, and observations, and conducted in-depth interviews with 19 participants from the intervention group at the end of their post-intervention period. Results: Participants from the intervention group used their LPG stove for 85.4 % of monitored days and 63.2 % of cooking minutes during the post-intervention months (13–24) when they were not receiving free fuel from the trial. They used a traditional stove (fogón) on 45.1 % of days post-intervention, which is significantly lower than fogón use by control participants during the intervention period (72.2 % of days). In months 13–24 post-intervention, participants from the intervention group purchased on average 12.3 kg and spent 34.1 soles (10.3 USD) per month on LPG. Continued LPG use was higher among participants who said they could afford two tanks of LPG per month, did not cook for animals, and removed their traditional stove. Women described that becoming accustomed to LPG, support and training from the project, consistent LPG supply, choice between LPG providers, and access to delivery services facilitated sustained LPG use. However, high cost was a major barrier to exclusive use. Conclusion: A 12-month period of intensive LPG support achieved a high level of sustained LPG use post-intervention, but other strategies are needed to sustain exclusive use.
KW - Clean cooking
KW - Household air pollution
KW - Household energy
KW - Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)
KW - Mixed methods research
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146887069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146887069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.esd.2023.01.005
DO - 10.1016/j.esd.2023.01.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85146887069
SN - 0973-0826
VL - 73
SP - 13
EP - 22
JO - Energy for Sustainable Development
JF - Energy for Sustainable Development
ER -