TY - JOUR
T1 - Survey Research
T2 - Do All RN Types Have the Same Perceptions Regarding Professional Nursing Governance?
AU - Speroni, Karen Gabel
AU - Budhathoki, Chakra
AU - Walters, Cynthia
AU - Dutton, Suzanne
AU - Mackay, Periwinkle
AU - Oguariri, Raphael M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE Researchers examined professional nursing governance perception differences by RN type (clinical, manager, and other RNs), and nurse-related outcome associations. BACKGROUND Shared governance is associated with improved nurse-related outcomes. Understanding differences in RN types regarding shared governance perceptions is important and not well studied. METHODS Mean Index of Professional Nursing Governance (IPNG) scores from 3 hospitals' 502 RNs were used to evaluate associations by RN type and unit-based nurse-related outcomes. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used. RESULTS Shared governance was the predominant finding (overall score and 4 of 6 subscale scores) with no significant differences by RN type. Traditional governance was scored for 1 subscale (control over personnel), which was not significant. There were no significant differences in the IPNG score associations with outcomes data by RN type. CONCLUSIONS Clinical nurses, managers, and other RN types perceived their governance as shared, without significant difference in the nurses' perceptions based on role.
AB - OBJECTIVE Researchers examined professional nursing governance perception differences by RN type (clinical, manager, and other RNs), and nurse-related outcome associations. BACKGROUND Shared governance is associated with improved nurse-related outcomes. Understanding differences in RN types regarding shared governance perceptions is important and not well studied. METHODS Mean Index of Professional Nursing Governance (IPNG) scores from 3 hospitals' 502 RNs were used to evaluate associations by RN type and unit-based nurse-related outcomes. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used. RESULTS Shared governance was the predominant finding (overall score and 4 of 6 subscale scores) with no significant differences by RN type. Traditional governance was scored for 1 subscale (control over personnel), which was not significant. There were no significant differences in the IPNG score associations with outcomes data by RN type. CONCLUSIONS Clinical nurses, managers, and other RN types perceived their governance as shared, without significant difference in the nurses' perceptions based on role.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129778335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129778335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001145
DO - 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001145
M3 - Article
C2 - 35420566
AN - SCOPUS:85129778335
SN - 0002-0443
VL - 52
SP - 258
EP - 265
JO - Journal of Nursing Administration
JF - Journal of Nursing Administration
IS - 5
ER -