Survey of the American college of surgeons scholarship recipients: A story of generating academic leaders

Gilbert R. Upchurch, Julie A. Freischlag, Wendy Novicoff, Kate Early, Patricia L. Turner, Michael J. Zinner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background The objective of this survey was to provide a review of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) scholarship activity. Study Design The domestic ACS scholarship recipient survey was electronically transmitted twice to awardees from 1987 to 2007 (n = 253). Themes of the survey included type of practice, activities during scholarship period, success of peer review funding, and the role of mentors. All survey responses were evaluated using SPSS version 20. Results There were 123 total responses, with 108 separate respondents (94, 1 award; 13, 2 awards; 1, 3 awards). The group averaged 11.8 years in clinical practice, with the majority (90.2%) having an academic appointment. Seventy-seven percent of respondents were on a tenure track, and almost three-quarters (72.4%) of the respondents hold a major leadership position. In terms of research, 67.5% of respondents have received extramural funding; 10.6% have received patents. The average number of publications related to their funded research is 19.2 (range 0 to 180). Most respondents perform peer review of research (73.2%), learned about the peer review process during their funding period (82.1%), and mentor medical students (88.6%). The average number of students currently mentored is 6.4; the average total trainees mentored is 13. Despite the significant research responsibilities of respondents, they still spend more time performing clinical care (49.2%) than research (30.4%). Conclusions The ACS scholarship has a significant impact on the recipient's academic career, even in the setting of increasing clinical burdens. This program also appears to tangentially identify surgeons who become leaders in academic surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1122-1127.e3
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume220
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mentors
Peer Review
Research
Research Peer Review
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons
Patents
Medical Students
Publications
Appointments and Schedules
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Survey of the American college of surgeons scholarship recipients : A story of generating academic leaders. / Upchurch, Gilbert R.; Freischlag, Julie A.; Novicoff, Wendy; Early, Kate; Turner, Patricia L.; Zinner, Michael J.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 220, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 1122-1127.e3.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Upchurch, Gilbert R. ; Freischlag, Julie A. ; Novicoff, Wendy ; Early, Kate ; Turner, Patricia L. ; Zinner, Michael J. / Survey of the American college of surgeons scholarship recipients : A story of generating academic leaders. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2015 ; Vol. 220, No. 6. pp. 1122-1127.e3.
@article{8bcc20d2823b4c169d75409e55fa5441,
title = "Survey of the American college of surgeons scholarship recipients: A story of generating academic leaders",
abstract = "Background The objective of this survey was to provide a review of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) scholarship activity. Study Design The domestic ACS scholarship recipient survey was electronically transmitted twice to awardees from 1987 to 2007 (n = 253). Themes of the survey included type of practice, activities during scholarship period, success of peer review funding, and the role of mentors. All survey responses were evaluated using SPSS version 20. Results There were 123 total responses, with 108 separate respondents (94, 1 award; 13, 2 awards; 1, 3 awards). The group averaged 11.8 years in clinical practice, with the majority (90.2{\%}) having an academic appointment. Seventy-seven percent of respondents were on a tenure track, and almost three-quarters (72.4{\%}) of the respondents hold a major leadership position. In terms of research, 67.5{\%} of respondents have received extramural funding; 10.6{\%} have received patents. The average number of publications related to their funded research is 19.2 (range 0 to 180). Most respondents perform peer review of research (73.2{\%}), learned about the peer review process during their funding period (82.1{\%}), and mentor medical students (88.6{\%}). The average number of students currently mentored is 6.4; the average total trainees mentored is 13. Despite the significant research responsibilities of respondents, they still spend more time performing clinical care (49.2{\%}) than research (30.4{\%}). Conclusions The ACS scholarship has a significant impact on the recipient's academic career, even in the setting of increasing clinical burdens. This program also appears to tangentially identify surgeons who become leaders in academic surgery.",
author = "Upchurch, {Gilbert R.} and Freischlag, {Julie A.} and Wendy Novicoff and Kate Early and Turner, {Patricia L.} and Zinner, {Michael J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "220",
pages = "1122--1127.e3",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survey of the American college of surgeons scholarship recipients

T2 - A story of generating academic leaders

AU - Upchurch, Gilbert R.

AU - Freischlag, Julie A.

AU - Novicoff, Wendy

AU - Early, Kate

AU - Turner, Patricia L.

AU - Zinner, Michael J.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Background The objective of this survey was to provide a review of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) scholarship activity. Study Design The domestic ACS scholarship recipient survey was electronically transmitted twice to awardees from 1987 to 2007 (n = 253). Themes of the survey included type of practice, activities during scholarship period, success of peer review funding, and the role of mentors. All survey responses were evaluated using SPSS version 20. Results There were 123 total responses, with 108 separate respondents (94, 1 award; 13, 2 awards; 1, 3 awards). The group averaged 11.8 years in clinical practice, with the majority (90.2%) having an academic appointment. Seventy-seven percent of respondents were on a tenure track, and almost three-quarters (72.4%) of the respondents hold a major leadership position. In terms of research, 67.5% of respondents have received extramural funding; 10.6% have received patents. The average number of publications related to their funded research is 19.2 (range 0 to 180). Most respondents perform peer review of research (73.2%), learned about the peer review process during their funding period (82.1%), and mentor medical students (88.6%). The average number of students currently mentored is 6.4; the average total trainees mentored is 13. Despite the significant research responsibilities of respondents, they still spend more time performing clinical care (49.2%) than research (30.4%). Conclusions The ACS scholarship has a significant impact on the recipient's academic career, even in the setting of increasing clinical burdens. This program also appears to tangentially identify surgeons who become leaders in academic surgery.

AB - Background The objective of this survey was to provide a review of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) scholarship activity. Study Design The domestic ACS scholarship recipient survey was electronically transmitted twice to awardees from 1987 to 2007 (n = 253). Themes of the survey included type of practice, activities during scholarship period, success of peer review funding, and the role of mentors. All survey responses were evaluated using SPSS version 20. Results There were 123 total responses, with 108 separate respondents (94, 1 award; 13, 2 awards; 1, 3 awards). The group averaged 11.8 years in clinical practice, with the majority (90.2%) having an academic appointment. Seventy-seven percent of respondents were on a tenure track, and almost three-quarters (72.4%) of the respondents hold a major leadership position. In terms of research, 67.5% of respondents have received extramural funding; 10.6% have received patents. The average number of publications related to their funded research is 19.2 (range 0 to 180). Most respondents perform peer review of research (73.2%), learned about the peer review process during their funding period (82.1%), and mentor medical students (88.6%). The average number of students currently mentored is 6.4; the average total trainees mentored is 13. Despite the significant research responsibilities of respondents, they still spend more time performing clinical care (49.2%) than research (30.4%). Conclusions The ACS scholarship has a significant impact on the recipient's academic career, even in the setting of increasing clinical burdens. This program also appears to tangentially identify surgeons who become leaders in academic surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929833481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929833481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.027

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 25998084

AN - SCOPUS:84929833481

VL - 220

SP - 1122-1127.e3

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 6

ER -