Survey of state medical and osteopathy board disciplinary web sites in 2006.

Meredith Larson, Peter Lurie, Benita Marcus, Sidney Wolfe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We sought to describe doctor disciplinary information provided on the web sites of state medical and osteopathic boards. Information collected included state board, hospital and federal government actions, as well as malpractice judgments and settlements and conviction information. Web sites were also assessed for user-friendliness, primarily their searchability. Expert reviewers provided weights for these elements, yielding a 100-point score. The median score was 42.4 (range: 12.3-83.7). All sites provided physician profile information and 92% offer at least some board disciplinary information. Thirty-two percent provided non-state disciplinary information and 13 states' web sites were not searchable. We conclude that some boards provide very limited information and many do not facilitate efficient consumer access. The findings were released on Public Citizen's web site on October 17, 2006.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-136
Number of pages16
JournalHealth matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)
Volume19
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

State Government
Federal Government
State Hospitals
Malpractice
Physicians
Weights and Measures
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Survey of state medical and osteopathy board disciplinary web sites in 2006. / Larson, Meredith; Lurie, Peter; Marcus, Benita; Wolfe, Sidney.

In: Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991), Vol. 19, No. 1, 12.2009, p. 121-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Larson, M, Lurie, P, Marcus, B & Wolfe, S 2009, 'Survey of state medical and osteopathy board disciplinary web sites in 2006.', Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991), vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 121-136.
Larson, Meredith ; Lurie, Peter ; Marcus, Benita ; Wolfe, Sidney. / Survey of state medical and osteopathy board disciplinary web sites in 2006. In: Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991). 2009 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 121-136.
@article{47ecb8c1cc624cf79fe1315f12669733,
title = "Survey of state medical and osteopathy board disciplinary web sites in 2006.",
abstract = "We sought to describe doctor disciplinary information provided on the web sites of state medical and osteopathic boards. Information collected included state board, hospital and federal government actions, as well as malpractice judgments and settlements and conviction information. Web sites were also assessed for user-friendliness, primarily their searchability. Expert reviewers provided weights for these elements, yielding a 100-point score. The median score was 42.4 (range: 12.3-83.7). All sites provided physician profile information and 92{\%} offer at least some board disciplinary information. Thirty-two percent provided non-state disciplinary information and 13 states' web sites were not searchable. We conclude that some boards provide very limited information and many do not facilitate efficient consumer access. The findings were released on Public Citizen's web site on October 17, 2006.",
author = "Meredith Larson and Peter Lurie and Benita Marcus and Sidney Wolfe",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "121--136",
journal = "Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)",
issn = "0748-383X",
publisher = "Case Western Reserve University. Law School",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survey of state medical and osteopathy board disciplinary web sites in 2006.

AU - Larson, Meredith

AU - Lurie, Peter

AU - Marcus, Benita

AU - Wolfe, Sidney

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - We sought to describe doctor disciplinary information provided on the web sites of state medical and osteopathic boards. Information collected included state board, hospital and federal government actions, as well as malpractice judgments and settlements and conviction information. Web sites were also assessed for user-friendliness, primarily their searchability. Expert reviewers provided weights for these elements, yielding a 100-point score. The median score was 42.4 (range: 12.3-83.7). All sites provided physician profile information and 92% offer at least some board disciplinary information. Thirty-two percent provided non-state disciplinary information and 13 states' web sites were not searchable. We conclude that some boards provide very limited information and many do not facilitate efficient consumer access. The findings were released on Public Citizen's web site on October 17, 2006.

AB - We sought to describe doctor disciplinary information provided on the web sites of state medical and osteopathic boards. Information collected included state board, hospital and federal government actions, as well as malpractice judgments and settlements and conviction information. Web sites were also assessed for user-friendliness, primarily their searchability. Expert reviewers provided weights for these elements, yielding a 100-point score. The median score was 42.4 (range: 12.3-83.7). All sites provided physician profile information and 92% offer at least some board disciplinary information. Thirty-two percent provided non-state disciplinary information and 13 states' web sites were not searchable. We conclude that some boards provide very limited information and many do not facilitate efficient consumer access. The findings were released on Public Citizen's web site on October 17, 2006.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649406432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649406432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19459539

AN - SCOPUS:67649406432

VL - 19

SP - 121

EP - 136

JO - Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)

JF - Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)

SN - 0748-383X

IS - 1

ER -