Survey of quality, readability, and social reach of websites on osteosarcoma in adolescents

Catherine G. Lam, Debra Roter, Kenneth J Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Little is known about Internet resources for adolescent patients. This study assessed the quality, readability, and social reach of websites on an illustrative adolescent cancer diagnosis, osteosarcoma. Methods: The top 50 results from four queries in two search engines were screened. Quality and readability were determined using standard DISCERN tool, Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kinkaid Grade. Social reach was gauged by social networking links, global website traffic, and a pilot adolescent-specificity measure. Results: Of 400 websites assessed, 56 (14%) met inclusion criteria. Websites' mean quality was fair (49.8 on 75-point scale; range 31.0-66.0, poor to excellent); 86% failed readability standards (Grade > 8); 75% offered at least one social networking link; and 34% offered site-specific social media. More than 60% received over 50,000 visits in the past month. Only 12.5% included adolescent-specific content. Of the 10 websites ranked highest for quality, only one achieved both readability targets and adolescent-specific content. Conclusions: Although some patient-oriented websites on osteosarcoma are of acceptable quality, most failed readability targets, and few appeared to address adolescents. Practice implications: Better awareness of Internet health resources and social media for adolescents with cancer is needed to address gaps, promote health literacy and facilitate patient-provider communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)82-87
Number of pages6
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume90
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Osteosarcoma
Social Networking
Social Media
Internet
Health Literacy
Search Engine
Health Resources
Surveys and Questionnaires
Reading
Neoplasms
Communication

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Cancer communication
  • Consumer health information
  • Health communication
  • Health literacy
  • Health promotion
  • Internet
  • Social media
  • Supportive care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Survey of quality, readability, and social reach of websites on osteosarcoma in adolescents. / Lam, Catherine G.; Roter, Debra; Cohen, Kenneth J.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 90, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 82-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{28223c2863e541d8be1547a88dfea691,
title = "Survey of quality, readability, and social reach of websites on osteosarcoma in adolescents",
abstract = "Objective: Little is known about Internet resources for adolescent patients. This study assessed the quality, readability, and social reach of websites on an illustrative adolescent cancer diagnosis, osteosarcoma. Methods: The top 50 results from four queries in two search engines were screened. Quality and readability were determined using standard DISCERN tool, Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kinkaid Grade. Social reach was gauged by social networking links, global website traffic, and a pilot adolescent-specificity measure. Results: Of 400 websites assessed, 56 (14{\%}) met inclusion criteria. Websites' mean quality was fair (49.8 on 75-point scale; range 31.0-66.0, poor to excellent); 86{\%} failed readability standards (Grade > 8); 75{\%} offered at least one social networking link; and 34{\%} offered site-specific social media. More than 60{\%} received over 50,000 visits in the past month. Only 12.5{\%} included adolescent-specific content. Of the 10 websites ranked highest for quality, only one achieved both readability targets and adolescent-specific content. Conclusions: Although some patient-oriented websites on osteosarcoma are of acceptable quality, most failed readability targets, and few appeared to address adolescents. Practice implications: Better awareness of Internet health resources and social media for adolescents with cancer is needed to address gaps, promote health literacy and facilitate patient-provider communication.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Cancer communication, Consumer health information, Health communication, Health literacy, Health promotion, Internet, Social media, Supportive care",
author = "Lam, {Catherine G.} and Debra Roter and Cohen, {Kenneth J}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "82--87",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survey of quality, readability, and social reach of websites on osteosarcoma in adolescents

AU - Lam, Catherine G.

AU - Roter, Debra

AU - Cohen, Kenneth J

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Objective: Little is known about Internet resources for adolescent patients. This study assessed the quality, readability, and social reach of websites on an illustrative adolescent cancer diagnosis, osteosarcoma. Methods: The top 50 results from four queries in two search engines were screened. Quality and readability were determined using standard DISCERN tool, Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kinkaid Grade. Social reach was gauged by social networking links, global website traffic, and a pilot adolescent-specificity measure. Results: Of 400 websites assessed, 56 (14%) met inclusion criteria. Websites' mean quality was fair (49.8 on 75-point scale; range 31.0-66.0, poor to excellent); 86% failed readability standards (Grade > 8); 75% offered at least one social networking link; and 34% offered site-specific social media. More than 60% received over 50,000 visits in the past month. Only 12.5% included adolescent-specific content. Of the 10 websites ranked highest for quality, only one achieved both readability targets and adolescent-specific content. Conclusions: Although some patient-oriented websites on osteosarcoma are of acceptable quality, most failed readability targets, and few appeared to address adolescents. Practice implications: Better awareness of Internet health resources and social media for adolescents with cancer is needed to address gaps, promote health literacy and facilitate patient-provider communication.

AB - Objective: Little is known about Internet resources for adolescent patients. This study assessed the quality, readability, and social reach of websites on an illustrative adolescent cancer diagnosis, osteosarcoma. Methods: The top 50 results from four queries in two search engines were screened. Quality and readability were determined using standard DISCERN tool, Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kinkaid Grade. Social reach was gauged by social networking links, global website traffic, and a pilot adolescent-specificity measure. Results: Of 400 websites assessed, 56 (14%) met inclusion criteria. Websites' mean quality was fair (49.8 on 75-point scale; range 31.0-66.0, poor to excellent); 86% failed readability standards (Grade > 8); 75% offered at least one social networking link; and 34% offered site-specific social media. More than 60% received over 50,000 visits in the past month. Only 12.5% included adolescent-specific content. Of the 10 websites ranked highest for quality, only one achieved both readability targets and adolescent-specific content. Conclusions: Although some patient-oriented websites on osteosarcoma are of acceptable quality, most failed readability targets, and few appeared to address adolescents. Practice implications: Better awareness of Internet health resources and social media for adolescents with cancer is needed to address gaps, promote health literacy and facilitate patient-provider communication.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Cancer communication

KW - Consumer health information

KW - Health communication

KW - Health literacy

KW - Health promotion

KW - Internet

KW - Social media

KW - Supportive care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870819940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870819940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 22959332

AN - SCOPUS:84870819940

VL - 90

SP - 82

EP - 87

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 1

ER -