Surrogate prediction of quality-of-life and desire for treatment: a guess of a guess

Scott Snyder, Halima Amjad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In conditions, such as dementia, stroke, or critical illness, clinicians often rely on substituted judgment through a surrogate to assist in medical decision making. Surrogates may face tough decisions regarding whether to pursue or forego surgery, tube feeding, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Surrogates often have little confidence in their decision (Majesko et al., 2012), though substituted judgment relies on the surrogate to determine the decision that the patient would have made. Prior studies suggest that surrogates predict patient preferences with only 68% accuracy (Shalowitz et al., 2006). This month's study by Bravo and colleagues (Bravo et al., 2017) explores differences in quality-of-life assessments between patients and surrogates as a potential explanation for surrogate inaccuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-2
Number of pages2
JournalInternational Psychogeriatrics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 5 2017

Fingerprint

tetrachloroisophthalonitrile
Quality of Life
Patient Preference
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Enteral Nutrition
Critical Illness
Dementia
Stroke
Therapeutics
Clinical Decision-Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Surrogate prediction of quality-of-life and desire for treatment : a guess of a guess. / Snyder, Scott; Amjad, Halima.

In: International Psychogeriatrics, 05.05.2017, p. 1-2.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1c6e4f85363e46dd869f5ef0acd802b8,
title = "Surrogate prediction of quality-of-life and desire for treatment: a guess of a guess",
abstract = "In conditions, such as dementia, stroke, or critical illness, clinicians often rely on substituted judgment through a surrogate to assist in medical decision making. Surrogates may face tough decisions regarding whether to pursue or forego surgery, tube feeding, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Surrogates often have little confidence in their decision (Majesko et al., 2012), though substituted judgment relies on the surrogate to determine the decision that the patient would have made. Prior studies suggest that surrogates predict patient preferences with only 68{\%} accuracy (Shalowitz et al., 2006). This month's study by Bravo and colleagues (Bravo et al., 2017) explores differences in quality-of-life assessments between patients and surrogates as a potential explanation for surrogate inaccuracy.",
author = "Scott Snyder and Halima Amjad",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1017/S1041610217000771",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--2",
journal = "International Psychogeriatrics",
issn = "1041-6102",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surrogate prediction of quality-of-life and desire for treatment

T2 - a guess of a guess

AU - Snyder, Scott

AU - Amjad, Halima

PY - 2017/5/5

Y1 - 2017/5/5

N2 - In conditions, such as dementia, stroke, or critical illness, clinicians often rely on substituted judgment through a surrogate to assist in medical decision making. Surrogates may face tough decisions regarding whether to pursue or forego surgery, tube feeding, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Surrogates often have little confidence in their decision (Majesko et al., 2012), though substituted judgment relies on the surrogate to determine the decision that the patient would have made. Prior studies suggest that surrogates predict patient preferences with only 68% accuracy (Shalowitz et al., 2006). This month's study by Bravo and colleagues (Bravo et al., 2017) explores differences in quality-of-life assessments between patients and surrogates as a potential explanation for surrogate inaccuracy.

AB - In conditions, such as dementia, stroke, or critical illness, clinicians often rely on substituted judgment through a surrogate to assist in medical decision making. Surrogates may face tough decisions regarding whether to pursue or forego surgery, tube feeding, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Surrogates often have little confidence in their decision (Majesko et al., 2012), though substituted judgment relies on the surrogate to determine the decision that the patient would have made. Prior studies suggest that surrogates predict patient preferences with only 68% accuracy (Shalowitz et al., 2006). This month's study by Bravo and colleagues (Bravo et al., 2017) explores differences in quality-of-life assessments between patients and surrogates as a potential explanation for surrogate inaccuracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018746050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018746050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1041610217000771

DO - 10.1017/S1041610217000771

M3 - Article

C2 - 28473002

AN - SCOPUS:85018746050

SP - 1

EP - 2

JO - International Psychogeriatrics

JF - International Psychogeriatrics

SN - 1041-6102

ER -