Surgical management of the failed slap repair

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Repair of superior labral tears anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions has become an increasingly common procedure, despite the low incidence rates reported in the literature. As the incidence of these procedures increases, the surgeons will be increasingly confronted with patients with painful shoulders after SLAP repair. Persistent pain after SLAP repair is multifactorial; careful preoperative workup is necessary to elucidate the cause of pain. Simple failure of the prior SLAP repair will rarely be the cause of persistent pain. Use of tacks is especially worrisome, and suture anchor repair is preferable. Articular cartilage injuries because of either bioabsorbable or metal hardware will often create significant residual disability. Recent literature suggests that older patients may be better served by primary biceps tenodesis rather than SLAP repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)162-166
Number of pages5
JournalSports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tears
Pain
Tenodesis
Suture Anchors
Incidence
Articular Cartilage
Metals
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • labrum
  • shoulder arthroscopy
  • SLAP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Surgical management of the failed slap repair. / Weber, Stephen.

In: Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.09.2010, p. 162-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{4f28fbd5cc55475d82166c25cb51d069,
title = "Surgical management of the failed slap repair",
abstract = "Repair of superior labral tears anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions has become an increasingly common procedure, despite the low incidence rates reported in the literature. As the incidence of these procedures increases, the surgeons will be increasingly confronted with patients with painful shoulders after SLAP repair. Persistent pain after SLAP repair is multifactorial; careful preoperative workup is necessary to elucidate the cause of pain. Simple failure of the prior SLAP repair will rarely be the cause of persistent pain. Use of tacks is especially worrisome, and suture anchor repair is preferable. Articular cartilage injuries because of either bioabsorbable or metal hardware will often create significant residual disability. Recent literature suggests that older patients may be better served by primary biceps tenodesis rather than SLAP repair.",
keywords = "labrum, shoulder arthroscopy, SLAP",
author = "Stephen Weber",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181eaf4ef",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "162--166",
journal = "Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review",
issn = "1062-8592",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical management of the failed slap repair

AU - Weber, Stephen

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - Repair of superior labral tears anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions has become an increasingly common procedure, despite the low incidence rates reported in the literature. As the incidence of these procedures increases, the surgeons will be increasingly confronted with patients with painful shoulders after SLAP repair. Persistent pain after SLAP repair is multifactorial; careful preoperative workup is necessary to elucidate the cause of pain. Simple failure of the prior SLAP repair will rarely be the cause of persistent pain. Use of tacks is especially worrisome, and suture anchor repair is preferable. Articular cartilage injuries because of either bioabsorbable or metal hardware will often create significant residual disability. Recent literature suggests that older patients may be better served by primary biceps tenodesis rather than SLAP repair.

AB - Repair of superior labral tears anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions has become an increasingly common procedure, despite the low incidence rates reported in the literature. As the incidence of these procedures increases, the surgeons will be increasingly confronted with patients with painful shoulders after SLAP repair. Persistent pain after SLAP repair is multifactorial; careful preoperative workup is necessary to elucidate the cause of pain. Simple failure of the prior SLAP repair will rarely be the cause of persistent pain. Use of tacks is especially worrisome, and suture anchor repair is preferable. Articular cartilage injuries because of either bioabsorbable or metal hardware will often create significant residual disability. Recent literature suggests that older patients may be better served by primary biceps tenodesis rather than SLAP repair.

KW - labrum

KW - shoulder arthroscopy

KW - SLAP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956031434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956031434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181eaf4ef

DO - 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181eaf4ef

M3 - Review article

VL - 18

SP - 162

EP - 166

JO - Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

JF - Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

SN - 1062-8592

IS - 3

ER -