Surgical malpractice in the United States, 1990-2006

Ryan K. Orosco, Jonathan Talamini, David C. Chang, Mark A. Talamini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Information about national trends and predictors of malpractice payments can constructively add to the hotly debated topic of medical malpractice. We sought to evaluate predictors of surgical malpractice payments and to explore national trends. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of surgery-related malpractice payments using the National Practitioner Data Bank from 1990 to 2006. Payments were adjusted to 2006 dollars. We evaluated predictors of payment size and large payments (defined as those >$1 million). Statutory law in the states demonstrating significant predictive values was analyzed. Results: In total, 58,518 surgical malpractice payments met inclusion criteria. Patients were predominantly female (62%) and inpatient (63%), with a mean age of 42 years. The number of payments decreased and payment sums increased during the study period. Median payment was $132,915 (95th percentile $983,263). Claims most frequently cited improper performance (42%). Patient outcomes were the strongest predictor of both payment size and likelihood of a large payment. Children younger than 10 years old were 70% more likely to receive a large payment (p = 0.005); and patients older than 70 years were 80% less likely (p <0.0005). Large variations across states were seen for both payment size and likelihood of large payment. The likelihood of reaching out-of-court settlement did not appear to be correlated with known factors. Conclusions: Nationwide, surgical malpractice claims show rising payment amounts. Patient outcomes are the strongest predictor of payment size. Considerable variation in payment size between states suggests a profound impact from local legal environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)480-488
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume215
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Malpractice
National Practitioner Data Bank
Inpatients
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Surgical malpractice in the United States, 1990-2006. / Orosco, Ryan K.; Talamini, Jonathan; Chang, David C.; Talamini, Mark A.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 215, No. 4, 10.2012, p. 480-488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Orosco, Ryan K. ; Talamini, Jonathan ; Chang, David C. ; Talamini, Mark A. / Surgical malpractice in the United States, 1990-2006. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2012 ; Vol. 215, No. 4. pp. 480-488.
@article{e931d065a64f4c45af59edb83e33f227,
title = "Surgical malpractice in the United States, 1990-2006",
abstract = "Background: Information about national trends and predictors of malpractice payments can constructively add to the hotly debated topic of medical malpractice. We sought to evaluate predictors of surgical malpractice payments and to explore national trends. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of surgery-related malpractice payments using the National Practitioner Data Bank from 1990 to 2006. Payments were adjusted to 2006 dollars. We evaluated predictors of payment size and large payments (defined as those >$1 million). Statutory law in the states demonstrating significant predictive values was analyzed. Results: In total, 58,518 surgical malpractice payments met inclusion criteria. Patients were predominantly female (62{\%}) and inpatient (63{\%}), with a mean age of 42 years. The number of payments decreased and payment sums increased during the study period. Median payment was $132,915 (95th percentile $983,263). Claims most frequently cited improper performance (42{\%}). Patient outcomes were the strongest predictor of both payment size and likelihood of a large payment. Children younger than 10 years old were 70{\%} more likely to receive a large payment (p = 0.005); and patients older than 70 years were 80{\%} less likely (p <0.0005). Large variations across states were seen for both payment size and likelihood of large payment. The likelihood of reaching out-of-court settlement did not appear to be correlated with known factors. Conclusions: Nationwide, surgical malpractice claims show rising payment amounts. Patient outcomes are the strongest predictor of payment size. Considerable variation in payment size between states suggests a profound impact from local legal environments.",
author = "Orosco, {Ryan K.} and Jonathan Talamini and Chang, {David C.} and Talamini, {Mark A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.04.028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "215",
pages = "480--488",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical malpractice in the United States, 1990-2006

AU - Orosco, Ryan K.

AU - Talamini, Jonathan

AU - Chang, David C.

AU - Talamini, Mark A.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Background: Information about national trends and predictors of malpractice payments can constructively add to the hotly debated topic of medical malpractice. We sought to evaluate predictors of surgical malpractice payments and to explore national trends. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of surgery-related malpractice payments using the National Practitioner Data Bank from 1990 to 2006. Payments were adjusted to 2006 dollars. We evaluated predictors of payment size and large payments (defined as those >$1 million). Statutory law in the states demonstrating significant predictive values was analyzed. Results: In total, 58,518 surgical malpractice payments met inclusion criteria. Patients were predominantly female (62%) and inpatient (63%), with a mean age of 42 years. The number of payments decreased and payment sums increased during the study period. Median payment was $132,915 (95th percentile $983,263). Claims most frequently cited improper performance (42%). Patient outcomes were the strongest predictor of both payment size and likelihood of a large payment. Children younger than 10 years old were 70% more likely to receive a large payment (p = 0.005); and patients older than 70 years were 80% less likely (p <0.0005). Large variations across states were seen for both payment size and likelihood of large payment. The likelihood of reaching out-of-court settlement did not appear to be correlated with known factors. Conclusions: Nationwide, surgical malpractice claims show rising payment amounts. Patient outcomes are the strongest predictor of payment size. Considerable variation in payment size between states suggests a profound impact from local legal environments.

AB - Background: Information about national trends and predictors of malpractice payments can constructively add to the hotly debated topic of medical malpractice. We sought to evaluate predictors of surgical malpractice payments and to explore national trends. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of surgery-related malpractice payments using the National Practitioner Data Bank from 1990 to 2006. Payments were adjusted to 2006 dollars. We evaluated predictors of payment size and large payments (defined as those >$1 million). Statutory law in the states demonstrating significant predictive values was analyzed. Results: In total, 58,518 surgical malpractice payments met inclusion criteria. Patients were predominantly female (62%) and inpatient (63%), with a mean age of 42 years. The number of payments decreased and payment sums increased during the study period. Median payment was $132,915 (95th percentile $983,263). Claims most frequently cited improper performance (42%). Patient outcomes were the strongest predictor of both payment size and likelihood of a large payment. Children younger than 10 years old were 70% more likely to receive a large payment (p = 0.005); and patients older than 70 years were 80% less likely (p <0.0005). Large variations across states were seen for both payment size and likelihood of large payment. The likelihood of reaching out-of-court settlement did not appear to be correlated with known factors. Conclusions: Nationwide, surgical malpractice claims show rising payment amounts. Patient outcomes are the strongest predictor of payment size. Considerable variation in payment size between states suggests a profound impact from local legal environments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866368224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866368224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.04.028

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.04.028

M3 - Article

VL - 215

SP - 480

EP - 488

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 4

ER -