Surgeons and their patients disagree regarding cosmetic and overall outcomes after surgery for high-energy lower extremity trauma

Robert V. O'Toole, Renan Carlos Castillo, Andrew N. Pollak, Ellen J Mackenzie, Michael J. Bosse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether surgeons' and patients' perceptions of outcomes after high-energy lower-extremity trauma are similar and to identify factors associated with disagreement. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Eight level 1 trauma centers. Patients: Four hundred sixty-three patients treated for limb-threatening lower extremity injuries and followed for 2 years. Intervention: Information collected on patients and injuries, functional and clinical outcomes, and surgeons' and patients' assessments of satisfaction with cosmetic and overall recovery. Main Outcome Measurements: Satisfaction ratings compared with weighted kappa statistics. Results: We observed very poor agreement between surgeons' and patients' perceptions of cosmetic and overall outcomes. Surgeons and patients agreed on overall outcomes at a rate only 25% higher than expected by chance (κ = 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.34). The level of disagreement was even higher for cosmetic outcomes as surgeons and patients agreed at a rate only 17% higher than expected by chance (κ = 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.26). Surgeons were less likely than patients to be satisfied with overall recovery if the patient had an Injury Severity Score >17, had a complication, or failed to return to work at 1 year. Patients were less satisfied than surgeons with overall recovery when the patient was dissatisfied with the quality of medical care. Surgeons were less likely than patients to be satisfied with cosmetic recovery if the patient sustained a traumatic amputation or experienced a complication. Patients were less likely than surgeons to be satisfied with cosmetic recovery if the patient was female or was dissatisfied with his or her medical care. Conclusions: Surgeons' perceptions of patients' cosmetic and overall outcomes differed significantly from those of patients. Agreement was significantly worse for certain subgroups of patients. Further study of this discordance might improve our understanding of patient dissatisfaction and allow development of a more patient-centered care process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)716-723
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume23
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Cosmetics
Lower Extremity
Wounds and Injuries
Surgeons
Traumatic Amputation
Confidence Intervals
Patient-Centered Care
Injury Severity Score
Return to Work
Quality of Health Care
Trauma Centers
Patient Satisfaction

Keywords

  • Cosmetic outcome
  • High-energy lower-extremity trauma
  • LEAP
  • Overall outcome
  • Patient perspective
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Surgeon perspective

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Surgeons and their patients disagree regarding cosmetic and overall outcomes after surgery for high-energy lower extremity trauma. / O'Toole, Robert V.; Castillo, Renan Carlos; Pollak, Andrew N.; Mackenzie, Ellen J; Bosse, Michael J.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 23, No. 10, 11.2009, p. 716-723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a9bdfa27f7a4146b28a8c1c55bd4826,
title = "Surgeons and their patients disagree regarding cosmetic and overall outcomes after surgery for high-energy lower extremity trauma",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine whether surgeons' and patients' perceptions of outcomes after high-energy lower-extremity trauma are similar and to identify factors associated with disagreement. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Eight level 1 trauma centers. Patients: Four hundred sixty-three patients treated for limb-threatening lower extremity injuries and followed for 2 years. Intervention: Information collected on patients and injuries, functional and clinical outcomes, and surgeons' and patients' assessments of satisfaction with cosmetic and overall recovery. Main Outcome Measurements: Satisfaction ratings compared with weighted kappa statistics. Results: We observed very poor agreement between surgeons' and patients' perceptions of cosmetic and overall outcomes. Surgeons and patients agreed on overall outcomes at a rate only 25{\%} higher than expected by chance (κ = 0.25; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.05-0.34). The level of disagreement was even higher for cosmetic outcomes as surgeons and patients agreed at a rate only 17{\%} higher than expected by chance (κ = 0.17; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.09-0.26). Surgeons were less likely than patients to be satisfied with overall recovery if the patient had an Injury Severity Score >17, had a complication, or failed to return to work at 1 year. Patients were less satisfied than surgeons with overall recovery when the patient was dissatisfied with the quality of medical care. Surgeons were less likely than patients to be satisfied with cosmetic recovery if the patient sustained a traumatic amputation or experienced a complication. Patients were less likely than surgeons to be satisfied with cosmetic recovery if the patient was female or was dissatisfied with his or her medical care. Conclusions: Surgeons' perceptions of patients' cosmetic and overall outcomes differed significantly from those of patients. Agreement was significantly worse for certain subgroups of patients. Further study of this discordance might improve our understanding of patient dissatisfaction and allow development of a more patient-centered care process.",
keywords = "Cosmetic outcome, High-energy lower-extremity trauma, LEAP, Overall outcome, Patient perspective, Patient satisfaction, Surgeon perspective",
author = "O'Toole, {Robert V.} and Castillo, {Renan Carlos} and Pollak, {Andrew N.} and Mackenzie, {Ellen J} and Bosse, {Michael J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ab2c90",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "716--723",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgeons and their patients disagree regarding cosmetic and overall outcomes after surgery for high-energy lower extremity trauma

AU - O'Toole, Robert V.

AU - Castillo, Renan Carlos

AU - Pollak, Andrew N.

AU - Mackenzie, Ellen J

AU - Bosse, Michael J.

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Objectives: To determine whether surgeons' and patients' perceptions of outcomes after high-energy lower-extremity trauma are similar and to identify factors associated with disagreement. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Eight level 1 trauma centers. Patients: Four hundred sixty-three patients treated for limb-threatening lower extremity injuries and followed for 2 years. Intervention: Information collected on patients and injuries, functional and clinical outcomes, and surgeons' and patients' assessments of satisfaction with cosmetic and overall recovery. Main Outcome Measurements: Satisfaction ratings compared with weighted kappa statistics. Results: We observed very poor agreement between surgeons' and patients' perceptions of cosmetic and overall outcomes. Surgeons and patients agreed on overall outcomes at a rate only 25% higher than expected by chance (κ = 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.34). The level of disagreement was even higher for cosmetic outcomes as surgeons and patients agreed at a rate only 17% higher than expected by chance (κ = 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.26). Surgeons were less likely than patients to be satisfied with overall recovery if the patient had an Injury Severity Score >17, had a complication, or failed to return to work at 1 year. Patients were less satisfied than surgeons with overall recovery when the patient was dissatisfied with the quality of medical care. Surgeons were less likely than patients to be satisfied with cosmetic recovery if the patient sustained a traumatic amputation or experienced a complication. Patients were less likely than surgeons to be satisfied with cosmetic recovery if the patient was female or was dissatisfied with his or her medical care. Conclusions: Surgeons' perceptions of patients' cosmetic and overall outcomes differed significantly from those of patients. Agreement was significantly worse for certain subgroups of patients. Further study of this discordance might improve our understanding of patient dissatisfaction and allow development of a more patient-centered care process.

AB - Objectives: To determine whether surgeons' and patients' perceptions of outcomes after high-energy lower-extremity trauma are similar and to identify factors associated with disagreement. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Eight level 1 trauma centers. Patients: Four hundred sixty-three patients treated for limb-threatening lower extremity injuries and followed for 2 years. Intervention: Information collected on patients and injuries, functional and clinical outcomes, and surgeons' and patients' assessments of satisfaction with cosmetic and overall recovery. Main Outcome Measurements: Satisfaction ratings compared with weighted kappa statistics. Results: We observed very poor agreement between surgeons' and patients' perceptions of cosmetic and overall outcomes. Surgeons and patients agreed on overall outcomes at a rate only 25% higher than expected by chance (κ = 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.34). The level of disagreement was even higher for cosmetic outcomes as surgeons and patients agreed at a rate only 17% higher than expected by chance (κ = 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.26). Surgeons were less likely than patients to be satisfied with overall recovery if the patient had an Injury Severity Score >17, had a complication, or failed to return to work at 1 year. Patients were less satisfied than surgeons with overall recovery when the patient was dissatisfied with the quality of medical care. Surgeons were less likely than patients to be satisfied with cosmetic recovery if the patient sustained a traumatic amputation or experienced a complication. Patients were less likely than surgeons to be satisfied with cosmetic recovery if the patient was female or was dissatisfied with his or her medical care. Conclusions: Surgeons' perceptions of patients' cosmetic and overall outcomes differed significantly from those of patients. Agreement was significantly worse for certain subgroups of patients. Further study of this discordance might improve our understanding of patient dissatisfaction and allow development of a more patient-centered care process.

KW - Cosmetic outcome

KW - High-energy lower-extremity trauma

KW - LEAP

KW - Overall outcome

KW - Patient perspective

KW - Patient satisfaction

KW - Surgeon perspective

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350786498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350786498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ab2c90

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ab2c90

M3 - Article

C2 - 19858980

AN - SCOPUS:70350786498

VL - 23

SP - 716

EP - 723

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 10

ER -