Surgeon and Caregiver Agreement on the Goals and Indications for Scoliosis Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Alexander J. Adams, Christian A. Refakis, John M. Flynn, Joshua M. Pahys, Randal R. Betz, Tracey P. Bastrom, Amer F. Samdani, Christopher M. Brusalis, Paul David Sponseller, Patrick J. Cahill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study Design: Prospective multicenter comparative study. Objectives: We aimed 1) to survey surgeons and caregivers to rank the surgical indications for spinal fusion of pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis secondary to cerebral palsy in order of importance and 2) to characterize the agreement of surgeons and caregivers on major (top three) indications. Summary of Background Data: Surgery for spinal deformity in children with cerebral palsy is a multifaceted and individualized decision that may lead to miscommunication during informed consent. Little data exist on communication effectiveness between surgeon and caregiver during preoperative discussion. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective survey of Harms Study Group patient caregivers and their surgeons. Participants ranked their most important of 15 indications in descending level of importance, where the top 3 selections were considered major indications for surgery for the particular patient in question. Demographic and other perioperative factors were recorded. Surgeon-caregiver agreement on major indications was determined, taking into account preoperative factors and intersurgeon differences. Results: 126 surgeon-caregiver pairs responded. The greatest percentage agreement that an indication was major was “to improve sitting” (69.0% major, 0.8% nonmajor), followed by “to prevent pulmonary compromise” (33.3% major, 24.6% nonmajor), “to improve pain” (31.7% major, 20.6% nonmajor), and “to improve head control/position” (20.7% major, 69.0% nonmajor). Preoperative pain showed an association with surgeon-caregiver agreement on pain as a major indication (p=.004), and intersurgeon differences in agreement on gastrointestinal and pain considerations existed (p=.002, p=.007, respectively). Conclusions: Surgeon-caregiver agreement is greater where literature support for a particular surgical indication is strong (ie, spinal fusion's known improvement of sitting posture in children with neuromuscular scoliosis). Stronger literature support may bolster surgeons’ confidence in recommending a particular procedure, fostering greater communication, understanding, and agreement on surgical necessity between caregivers and surgeons. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)304-311
Number of pages8
JournalSpine Deformity
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Cerebral Palsy
Caregivers
Pain
Spinal Fusion
Communication
Surgeons
Prospective Studies
Foster Home Care
Informed Consent
Posture
Multicenter Studies
Head
Demography
Pediatrics
Lung

Keywords

  • Cerebral palsy
  • Preoperative discussion
  • Scoliosis surgery
  • Surgeon caregiver agreement
  • Surgical goals and indications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Adams, A. J., Refakis, C. A., Flynn, J. M., Pahys, J. M., Betz, R. R., Bastrom, T. P., ... Cahill, P. J. (2019). Surgeon and Caregiver Agreement on the Goals and Indications for Scoliosis Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy. Spine Deformity, 7(2), 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.07.004

Surgeon and Caregiver Agreement on the Goals and Indications for Scoliosis Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy. / Adams, Alexander J.; Refakis, Christian A.; Flynn, John M.; Pahys, Joshua M.; Betz, Randal R.; Bastrom, Tracey P.; Samdani, Amer F.; Brusalis, Christopher M.; Sponseller, Paul David; Cahill, Patrick J.

In: Spine Deformity, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.03.2019, p. 304-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Adams, AJ, Refakis, CA, Flynn, JM, Pahys, JM, Betz, RR, Bastrom, TP, Samdani, AF, Brusalis, CM, Sponseller, PD & Cahill, PJ 2019, 'Surgeon and Caregiver Agreement on the Goals and Indications for Scoliosis Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy', Spine Deformity, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.07.004
Adams, Alexander J. ; Refakis, Christian A. ; Flynn, John M. ; Pahys, Joshua M. ; Betz, Randal R. ; Bastrom, Tracey P. ; Samdani, Amer F. ; Brusalis, Christopher M. ; Sponseller, Paul David ; Cahill, Patrick J. / Surgeon and Caregiver Agreement on the Goals and Indications for Scoliosis Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy. In: Spine Deformity. 2019 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 304-311.
@article{f5e5fc96558c46869e0cf9aca405ab9e,
title = "Surgeon and Caregiver Agreement on the Goals and Indications for Scoliosis Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy",
abstract = "Study Design: Prospective multicenter comparative study. Objectives: We aimed 1) to survey surgeons and caregivers to rank the surgical indications for spinal fusion of pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis secondary to cerebral palsy in order of importance and 2) to characterize the agreement of surgeons and caregivers on major (top three) indications. Summary of Background Data: Surgery for spinal deformity in children with cerebral palsy is a multifaceted and individualized decision that may lead to miscommunication during informed consent. Little data exist on communication effectiveness between surgeon and caregiver during preoperative discussion. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective survey of Harms Study Group patient caregivers and their surgeons. Participants ranked their most important of 15 indications in descending level of importance, where the top 3 selections were considered major indications for surgery for the particular patient in question. Demographic and other perioperative factors were recorded. Surgeon-caregiver agreement on major indications was determined, taking into account preoperative factors and intersurgeon differences. Results: 126 surgeon-caregiver pairs responded. The greatest percentage agreement that an indication was major was “to improve sitting” (69.0{\%} major, 0.8{\%} nonmajor), followed by “to prevent pulmonary compromise” (33.3{\%} major, 24.6{\%} nonmajor), “to improve pain” (31.7{\%} major, 20.6{\%} nonmajor), and “to improve head control/position” (20.7{\%} major, 69.0{\%} nonmajor). Preoperative pain showed an association with surgeon-caregiver agreement on pain as a major indication (p=.004), and intersurgeon differences in agreement on gastrointestinal and pain considerations existed (p=.002, p=.007, respectively). Conclusions: Surgeon-caregiver agreement is greater where literature support for a particular surgical indication is strong (ie, spinal fusion's known improvement of sitting posture in children with neuromuscular scoliosis). Stronger literature support may bolster surgeons’ confidence in recommending a particular procedure, fostering greater communication, understanding, and agreement on surgical necessity between caregivers and surgeons. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.",
keywords = "Cerebral palsy, Preoperative discussion, Scoliosis surgery, Surgeon caregiver agreement, Surgical goals and indications",
author = "Adams, {Alexander J.} and Refakis, {Christian A.} and Flynn, {John M.} and Pahys, {Joshua M.} and Betz, {Randal R.} and Bastrom, {Tracey P.} and Samdani, {Amer F.} and Brusalis, {Christopher M.} and Sponseller, {Paul David} and Cahill, {Patrick J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jspd.2018.07.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "304--311",
journal = "Spine Deformity",
issn = "2212-134X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgeon and Caregiver Agreement on the Goals and Indications for Scoliosis Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy

AU - Adams, Alexander J.

AU - Refakis, Christian A.

AU - Flynn, John M.

AU - Pahys, Joshua M.

AU - Betz, Randal R.

AU - Bastrom, Tracey P.

AU - Samdani, Amer F.

AU - Brusalis, Christopher M.

AU - Sponseller, Paul David

AU - Cahill, Patrick J.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Study Design: Prospective multicenter comparative study. Objectives: We aimed 1) to survey surgeons and caregivers to rank the surgical indications for spinal fusion of pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis secondary to cerebral palsy in order of importance and 2) to characterize the agreement of surgeons and caregivers on major (top three) indications. Summary of Background Data: Surgery for spinal deformity in children with cerebral palsy is a multifaceted and individualized decision that may lead to miscommunication during informed consent. Little data exist on communication effectiveness between surgeon and caregiver during preoperative discussion. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective survey of Harms Study Group patient caregivers and their surgeons. Participants ranked their most important of 15 indications in descending level of importance, where the top 3 selections were considered major indications for surgery for the particular patient in question. Demographic and other perioperative factors were recorded. Surgeon-caregiver agreement on major indications was determined, taking into account preoperative factors and intersurgeon differences. Results: 126 surgeon-caregiver pairs responded. The greatest percentage agreement that an indication was major was “to improve sitting” (69.0% major, 0.8% nonmajor), followed by “to prevent pulmonary compromise” (33.3% major, 24.6% nonmajor), “to improve pain” (31.7% major, 20.6% nonmajor), and “to improve head control/position” (20.7% major, 69.0% nonmajor). Preoperative pain showed an association with surgeon-caregiver agreement on pain as a major indication (p=.004), and intersurgeon differences in agreement on gastrointestinal and pain considerations existed (p=.002, p=.007, respectively). Conclusions: Surgeon-caregiver agreement is greater where literature support for a particular surgical indication is strong (ie, spinal fusion's known improvement of sitting posture in children with neuromuscular scoliosis). Stronger literature support may bolster surgeons’ confidence in recommending a particular procedure, fostering greater communication, understanding, and agreement on surgical necessity between caregivers and surgeons. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

AB - Study Design: Prospective multicenter comparative study. Objectives: We aimed 1) to survey surgeons and caregivers to rank the surgical indications for spinal fusion of pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis secondary to cerebral palsy in order of importance and 2) to characterize the agreement of surgeons and caregivers on major (top three) indications. Summary of Background Data: Surgery for spinal deformity in children with cerebral palsy is a multifaceted and individualized decision that may lead to miscommunication during informed consent. Little data exist on communication effectiveness between surgeon and caregiver during preoperative discussion. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective survey of Harms Study Group patient caregivers and their surgeons. Participants ranked their most important of 15 indications in descending level of importance, where the top 3 selections were considered major indications for surgery for the particular patient in question. Demographic and other perioperative factors were recorded. Surgeon-caregiver agreement on major indications was determined, taking into account preoperative factors and intersurgeon differences. Results: 126 surgeon-caregiver pairs responded. The greatest percentage agreement that an indication was major was “to improve sitting” (69.0% major, 0.8% nonmajor), followed by “to prevent pulmonary compromise” (33.3% major, 24.6% nonmajor), “to improve pain” (31.7% major, 20.6% nonmajor), and “to improve head control/position” (20.7% major, 69.0% nonmajor). Preoperative pain showed an association with surgeon-caregiver agreement on pain as a major indication (p=.004), and intersurgeon differences in agreement on gastrointestinal and pain considerations existed (p=.002, p=.007, respectively). Conclusions: Surgeon-caregiver agreement is greater where literature support for a particular surgical indication is strong (ie, spinal fusion's known improvement of sitting posture in children with neuromuscular scoliosis). Stronger literature support may bolster surgeons’ confidence in recommending a particular procedure, fostering greater communication, understanding, and agreement on surgical necessity between caregivers and surgeons. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

KW - Cerebral palsy

KW - Preoperative discussion

KW - Scoliosis surgery

KW - Surgeon caregiver agreement

KW - Surgical goals and indications

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053145538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053145538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.07.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 30660226

AN - SCOPUS:85053145538

VL - 7

SP - 304

EP - 311

JO - Spine Deformity

JF - Spine Deformity

SN - 2212-134X

IS - 2

ER -