Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone Acetonide for Retinal Vein Occlusion: Results of the Tanzanite Study

Tanzanite Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of treatment with suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide (CLS-TA) plus intravitreal aflibercept vs. treatment with aflibercept alone in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Design: Randomized masked controlled clinical trial. Subjects: Forty-six patients with RVO. Methods: Subjects were randomized 1:1 to suprachoroidal injection of CLS-TA plus intravitreal aflibercept (combination arm) or sham suprachoroidal injection plus aflibercept (aflibercept arm), followed by aflibercept as needed at months 1, 2, and 3 in each arm. Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the number of protocol-required aflibercept re-treatments through month 3. Secondary outcomes included mean improvement from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and the percentage of participants with CST ≤310 μm at each time point. Results: The number of re-treatments were reduced in the combination arm compared with that in the aflibercept arm (23 vs. 9; −61%; P = 0.013) and the percentage of participants requiring no re-treatments was increased (78% vs. 30%; P = 0.003). The mean improvement from baseline BCVA letter score in combination vs. that in the aflibercept arms was 16.1 vs. 11.4 (P = 0.20) at month 1, 20.4 vs. 11.9 (P = 0.04) at month 2, and 18.9 vs. 11.3 (P = 0.09) at month 3. The mean baseline CST in the combination arm (731.1 μm) decreased into the normal range at month 1 (284.7 μm) and remained there at months 2 and 3 (272.4 μm and 285.4 μm). The mean baseline CST (727.5 μm) in the aflibercept arm decreased to 322.8 μm at month 1 and increased at months 2 and 3 (383.4 μm and 384.6 μm). Edema resolution (CST ≤ 310 μm) occurred in 87.0%, 87.0%, and 78.3% of participants in the combination arm at months 1, 2, and 3, respectively, vs. 56.5%, 47.8%, and 47.8% of participants in the aflibercept arm. In the combination arm, 1 participant had cataract progression and 4 (2 with preexistent glaucoma) had increased intraocular pressure that was controlled with topical medication. Conclusions: Combination intravitreal aflibercept and suprachoroidal CLS-TA is well tolerated and significantly reduces the need for additional intravitreal aflibercept injections over a 3-month period in patients with RVO. Preliminary evidence suggests that combination therapy may sustain edema resolution and improve visual outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-328
Number of pages9
JournalOphthalmology Retina
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Triamcinolone Acetonide
Retinal Vein Occlusion
aflibercept
Visual Acuity
Edema
Therapeutics
Intravitreal Injections
Injections
Macular Edema
Intraocular Pressure
Glaucoma
Cataract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone Acetonide for Retinal Vein Occlusion : Results of the Tanzanite Study. / Tanzanite Study Group.

In: Ophthalmology Retina, Vol. 2, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 320-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5e30cc4e00c84837b5bd7a4b9c0e5bce,
title = "Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone Acetonide for Retinal Vein Occlusion: Results of the Tanzanite Study",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of treatment with suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide (CLS-TA) plus intravitreal aflibercept vs. treatment with aflibercept alone in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Design: Randomized masked controlled clinical trial. Subjects: Forty-six patients with RVO. Methods: Subjects were randomized 1:1 to suprachoroidal injection of CLS-TA plus intravitreal aflibercept (combination arm) or sham suprachoroidal injection plus aflibercept (aflibercept arm), followed by aflibercept as needed at months 1, 2, and 3 in each arm. Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the number of protocol-required aflibercept re-treatments through month 3. Secondary outcomes included mean improvement from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and the percentage of participants with CST ≤310 μm at each time point. Results: The number of re-treatments were reduced in the combination arm compared with that in the aflibercept arm (23 vs. 9; −61{\%}; P = 0.013) and the percentage of participants requiring no re-treatments was increased (78{\%} vs. 30{\%}; P = 0.003). The mean improvement from baseline BCVA letter score in combination vs. that in the aflibercept arms was 16.1 vs. 11.4 (P = 0.20) at month 1, 20.4 vs. 11.9 (P = 0.04) at month 2, and 18.9 vs. 11.3 (P = 0.09) at month 3. The mean baseline CST in the combination arm (731.1 μm) decreased into the normal range at month 1 (284.7 μm) and remained there at months 2 and 3 (272.4 μm and 285.4 μm). The mean baseline CST (727.5 μm) in the aflibercept arm decreased to 322.8 μm at month 1 and increased at months 2 and 3 (383.4 μm and 384.6 μm). Edema resolution (CST ≤ 310 μm) occurred in 87.0{\%}, 87.0{\%}, and 78.3{\%} of participants in the combination arm at months 1, 2, and 3, respectively, vs. 56.5{\%}, 47.8{\%}, and 47.8{\%} of participants in the aflibercept arm. In the combination arm, 1 participant had cataract progression and 4 (2 with preexistent glaucoma) had increased intraocular pressure that was controlled with topical medication. Conclusions: Combination intravitreal aflibercept and suprachoroidal CLS-TA is well tolerated and significantly reduces the need for additional intravitreal aflibercept injections over a 3-month period in patients with RVO. Preliminary evidence suggests that combination therapy may sustain edema resolution and improve visual outcomes.",
author = "{Tanzanite Study Group} and Campochiaro, {Peter A} and Wykoff, {Charles C.} and Brown, {David M.} and Boyer, {David S.} and Mark Barakat and Donna Taraborelli and Glenn Noronha",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.oret.2017.07.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "320--328",
journal = "Ophthalmology Retina",
issn = "2468-7219",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone Acetonide for Retinal Vein Occlusion

T2 - Results of the Tanzanite Study

AU - Tanzanite Study Group

AU - Campochiaro, Peter A

AU - Wykoff, Charles C.

AU - Brown, David M.

AU - Boyer, David S.

AU - Barakat, Mark

AU - Taraborelli, Donna

AU - Noronha, Glenn

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of treatment with suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide (CLS-TA) plus intravitreal aflibercept vs. treatment with aflibercept alone in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Design: Randomized masked controlled clinical trial. Subjects: Forty-six patients with RVO. Methods: Subjects were randomized 1:1 to suprachoroidal injection of CLS-TA plus intravitreal aflibercept (combination arm) or sham suprachoroidal injection plus aflibercept (aflibercept arm), followed by aflibercept as needed at months 1, 2, and 3 in each arm. Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the number of protocol-required aflibercept re-treatments through month 3. Secondary outcomes included mean improvement from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and the percentage of participants with CST ≤310 μm at each time point. Results: The number of re-treatments were reduced in the combination arm compared with that in the aflibercept arm (23 vs. 9; −61%; P = 0.013) and the percentage of participants requiring no re-treatments was increased (78% vs. 30%; P = 0.003). The mean improvement from baseline BCVA letter score in combination vs. that in the aflibercept arms was 16.1 vs. 11.4 (P = 0.20) at month 1, 20.4 vs. 11.9 (P = 0.04) at month 2, and 18.9 vs. 11.3 (P = 0.09) at month 3. The mean baseline CST in the combination arm (731.1 μm) decreased into the normal range at month 1 (284.7 μm) and remained there at months 2 and 3 (272.4 μm and 285.4 μm). The mean baseline CST (727.5 μm) in the aflibercept arm decreased to 322.8 μm at month 1 and increased at months 2 and 3 (383.4 μm and 384.6 μm). Edema resolution (CST ≤ 310 μm) occurred in 87.0%, 87.0%, and 78.3% of participants in the combination arm at months 1, 2, and 3, respectively, vs. 56.5%, 47.8%, and 47.8% of participants in the aflibercept arm. In the combination arm, 1 participant had cataract progression and 4 (2 with preexistent glaucoma) had increased intraocular pressure that was controlled with topical medication. Conclusions: Combination intravitreal aflibercept and suprachoroidal CLS-TA is well tolerated and significantly reduces the need for additional intravitreal aflibercept injections over a 3-month period in patients with RVO. Preliminary evidence suggests that combination therapy may sustain edema resolution and improve visual outcomes.

AB - Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of treatment with suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide (CLS-TA) plus intravitreal aflibercept vs. treatment with aflibercept alone in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Design: Randomized masked controlled clinical trial. Subjects: Forty-six patients with RVO. Methods: Subjects were randomized 1:1 to suprachoroidal injection of CLS-TA plus intravitreal aflibercept (combination arm) or sham suprachoroidal injection plus aflibercept (aflibercept arm), followed by aflibercept as needed at months 1, 2, and 3 in each arm. Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the number of protocol-required aflibercept re-treatments through month 3. Secondary outcomes included mean improvement from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and the percentage of participants with CST ≤310 μm at each time point. Results: The number of re-treatments were reduced in the combination arm compared with that in the aflibercept arm (23 vs. 9; −61%; P = 0.013) and the percentage of participants requiring no re-treatments was increased (78% vs. 30%; P = 0.003). The mean improvement from baseline BCVA letter score in combination vs. that in the aflibercept arms was 16.1 vs. 11.4 (P = 0.20) at month 1, 20.4 vs. 11.9 (P = 0.04) at month 2, and 18.9 vs. 11.3 (P = 0.09) at month 3. The mean baseline CST in the combination arm (731.1 μm) decreased into the normal range at month 1 (284.7 μm) and remained there at months 2 and 3 (272.4 μm and 285.4 μm). The mean baseline CST (727.5 μm) in the aflibercept arm decreased to 322.8 μm at month 1 and increased at months 2 and 3 (383.4 μm and 384.6 μm). Edema resolution (CST ≤ 310 μm) occurred in 87.0%, 87.0%, and 78.3% of participants in the combination arm at months 1, 2, and 3, respectively, vs. 56.5%, 47.8%, and 47.8% of participants in the aflibercept arm. In the combination arm, 1 participant had cataract progression and 4 (2 with preexistent glaucoma) had increased intraocular pressure that was controlled with topical medication. Conclusions: Combination intravitreal aflibercept and suprachoroidal CLS-TA is well tolerated and significantly reduces the need for additional intravitreal aflibercept injections over a 3-month period in patients with RVO. Preliminary evidence suggests that combination therapy may sustain edema resolution and improve visual outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046069094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046069094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.oret.2017.07.013

DO - 10.1016/j.oret.2017.07.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 31047241

AN - SCOPUS:85046069094

VL - 2

SP - 320

EP - 328

JO - Ophthalmology Retina

JF - Ophthalmology Retina

SN - 2468-7219

IS - 4

ER -