Abstract
In this essay, we present three case studies which suggest that sometimes we are better off supporting a so-called irrational suicide, and that emotional or psychological distress - even if medically controllable - might justify a suicide. We underscore how complicated these decisions are and how murky a physician's moral role can be. We advocate a more individualized route to end-of-life care, eschewing well-meaning, principled, generalizations in favor of a highly contextualized, patient-centered, approach. We conclude that our Western traditions of promoting reasoned behavior and life themselves may at times be counter-productive.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 425-438 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Bioethics |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2002 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Philosophy
- Health Policy