SU‐FF‐J‐78: Evaluation of Setup Accuracy for Hypofractionated Radiotherapy of Liver Using Portal Imaging and On‐Line KV Fluoroscopy

J‐p Bissonnette, M. Hawkins, D. Moseley, C. Eccles, Jeff Siewerdsen, D. Jaffray, L. Dawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To compare image‐guided accuracy for stereotactic radiotherapy of the liver in terms of reproducibility and targeting confidence. Method and Materials: The study involved eight patients treated for inoperable liver metastases or hepatobiliary carcinoma. Each treatment fraction, these patients were imaged and repositioned using orthogonal portal images acquired in AP and lateral views. Repositioning occurred when the measured offset exceed 3mm in any of the cranio‐caudal (CC), anterior‐posterior (AP), and medio‐lateral (ML) directions. A second pair of orthogonal images assessed the residual setup accuracy. Orthogonal fluoroscopy sessions, each lasting 30 s, were acquired; some prior, but most after radiotherapy delivery. All images were acquired with the patient under active breathing control. All treatments were performed using a conventional medical linear accelerator equipped with a kilovoltage x‐ray source and flat‐panel detector mounted at 90 degrees from the linac beam central axis. The right diaphragm was used as a surrogate for the liver position. The reproducibility and stability of the diaphragm was thus analysed for a total of 48 fractions. Results: After initial setup and repositioning, the residual setup error determined from portal images was 2.6 (CC), 3.0 (AP), and 2.6 mm (ML); conversely, the residual setup error measured from the kilovoltage fluoroscopy sessions was 3.2 (CC), 3.1 (AP), and 2.1 mm (ML). Conclusion: Daily portal imaging and repositioning based on these images improves setup accuracy. Similar accuracy is shown from kilovoltage fluoroscopy analysis. On‐line fluoroscopy can potentially assess patient position prior and after delivery of radiation therapy, and provide a baseline for cone‐beam CT analysis. Conflict of Interest:: This work is supported, in part, by Elekta Radiation Oncology. LD is supported by an ASCO career development award.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1937-1938
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Physics
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fluoroscopy
Radiotherapy
Liver
Diaphragm
Conflict of Interest
Particle Accelerators
Radiation Oncology
Respiration
X-Rays
Neoplasm Metastasis
Carcinoma
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐FF‐J‐78 : Evaluation of Setup Accuracy for Hypofractionated Radiotherapy of Liver Using Portal Imaging and On‐Line KV Fluoroscopy. / Bissonnette, J‐p; Hawkins, M.; Moseley, D.; Eccles, C.; Siewerdsen, Jeff; Jaffray, D.; Dawson, L.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2005, p. 1937-1938.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bissonnette, J‐p ; Hawkins, M. ; Moseley, D. ; Eccles, C. ; Siewerdsen, Jeff ; Jaffray, D. ; Dawson, L. / SU‐FF‐J‐78 : Evaluation of Setup Accuracy for Hypofractionated Radiotherapy of Liver Using Portal Imaging and On‐Line KV Fluoroscopy. In: Medical Physics. 2005 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 1937-1938.
@article{f1efc27692f4489193affa8db23f1af6,
title = "SU‐FF‐J‐78: Evaluation of Setup Accuracy for Hypofractionated Radiotherapy of Liver Using Portal Imaging and On‐Line KV Fluoroscopy",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare image‐guided accuracy for stereotactic radiotherapy of the liver in terms of reproducibility and targeting confidence. Method and Materials: The study involved eight patients treated for inoperable liver metastases or hepatobiliary carcinoma. Each treatment fraction, these patients were imaged and repositioned using orthogonal portal images acquired in AP and lateral views. Repositioning occurred when the measured offset exceed 3mm in any of the cranio‐caudal (CC), anterior‐posterior (AP), and medio‐lateral (ML) directions. A second pair of orthogonal images assessed the residual setup accuracy. Orthogonal fluoroscopy sessions, each lasting 30 s, were acquired; some prior, but most after radiotherapy delivery. All images were acquired with the patient under active breathing control. All treatments were performed using a conventional medical linear accelerator equipped with a kilovoltage x‐ray source and flat‐panel detector mounted at 90 degrees from the linac beam central axis. The right diaphragm was used as a surrogate for the liver position. The reproducibility and stability of the diaphragm was thus analysed for a total of 48 fractions. Results: After initial setup and repositioning, the residual setup error determined from portal images was 2.6 (CC), 3.0 (AP), and 2.6 mm (ML); conversely, the residual setup error measured from the kilovoltage fluoroscopy sessions was 3.2 (CC), 3.1 (AP), and 2.1 mm (ML). Conclusion: Daily portal imaging and repositioning based on these images improves setup accuracy. Similar accuracy is shown from kilovoltage fluoroscopy analysis. On‐line fluoroscopy can potentially assess patient position prior and after delivery of radiation therapy, and provide a baseline for cone‐beam CT analysis. Conflict of Interest:: This work is supported, in part, by Elekta Radiation Oncology. LD is supported by an ASCO career development award.",
author = "J‐p Bissonnette and M. Hawkins and D. Moseley and C. Eccles and Jeff Siewerdsen and D. Jaffray and L. Dawson",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1118/1.1997624",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1937--1938",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐J‐78

T2 - Evaluation of Setup Accuracy for Hypofractionated Radiotherapy of Liver Using Portal Imaging and On‐Line KV Fluoroscopy

AU - Bissonnette, J‐p

AU - Hawkins, M.

AU - Moseley, D.

AU - Eccles, C.

AU - Siewerdsen, Jeff

AU - Jaffray, D.

AU - Dawson, L.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Purpose: To compare image‐guided accuracy for stereotactic radiotherapy of the liver in terms of reproducibility and targeting confidence. Method and Materials: The study involved eight patients treated for inoperable liver metastases or hepatobiliary carcinoma. Each treatment fraction, these patients were imaged and repositioned using orthogonal portal images acquired in AP and lateral views. Repositioning occurred when the measured offset exceed 3mm in any of the cranio‐caudal (CC), anterior‐posterior (AP), and medio‐lateral (ML) directions. A second pair of orthogonal images assessed the residual setup accuracy. Orthogonal fluoroscopy sessions, each lasting 30 s, were acquired; some prior, but most after radiotherapy delivery. All images were acquired with the patient under active breathing control. All treatments were performed using a conventional medical linear accelerator equipped with a kilovoltage x‐ray source and flat‐panel detector mounted at 90 degrees from the linac beam central axis. The right diaphragm was used as a surrogate for the liver position. The reproducibility and stability of the diaphragm was thus analysed for a total of 48 fractions. Results: After initial setup and repositioning, the residual setup error determined from portal images was 2.6 (CC), 3.0 (AP), and 2.6 mm (ML); conversely, the residual setup error measured from the kilovoltage fluoroscopy sessions was 3.2 (CC), 3.1 (AP), and 2.1 mm (ML). Conclusion: Daily portal imaging and repositioning based on these images improves setup accuracy. Similar accuracy is shown from kilovoltage fluoroscopy analysis. On‐line fluoroscopy can potentially assess patient position prior and after delivery of radiation therapy, and provide a baseline for cone‐beam CT analysis. Conflict of Interest:: This work is supported, in part, by Elekta Radiation Oncology. LD is supported by an ASCO career development award.

AB - Purpose: To compare image‐guided accuracy for stereotactic radiotherapy of the liver in terms of reproducibility and targeting confidence. Method and Materials: The study involved eight patients treated for inoperable liver metastases or hepatobiliary carcinoma. Each treatment fraction, these patients were imaged and repositioned using orthogonal portal images acquired in AP and lateral views. Repositioning occurred when the measured offset exceed 3mm in any of the cranio‐caudal (CC), anterior‐posterior (AP), and medio‐lateral (ML) directions. A second pair of orthogonal images assessed the residual setup accuracy. Orthogonal fluoroscopy sessions, each lasting 30 s, were acquired; some prior, but most after radiotherapy delivery. All images were acquired with the patient under active breathing control. All treatments were performed using a conventional medical linear accelerator equipped with a kilovoltage x‐ray source and flat‐panel detector mounted at 90 degrees from the linac beam central axis. The right diaphragm was used as a surrogate for the liver position. The reproducibility and stability of the diaphragm was thus analysed for a total of 48 fractions. Results: After initial setup and repositioning, the residual setup error determined from portal images was 2.6 (CC), 3.0 (AP), and 2.6 mm (ML); conversely, the residual setup error measured from the kilovoltage fluoroscopy sessions was 3.2 (CC), 3.1 (AP), and 2.1 mm (ML). Conclusion: Daily portal imaging and repositioning based on these images improves setup accuracy. Similar accuracy is shown from kilovoltage fluoroscopy analysis. On‐line fluoroscopy can potentially assess patient position prior and after delivery of radiation therapy, and provide a baseline for cone‐beam CT analysis. Conflict of Interest:: This work is supported, in part, by Elekta Radiation Oncology. LD is supported by an ASCO career development award.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024802402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024802402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1997624

DO - 10.1118/1.1997624

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024802402

VL - 32

SP - 1937

EP - 1938

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -