SU‐E‐J‐146: Effectiveness of Daily Endorectal Balloon for Post‐Prostatectomy Patients Undergoing Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy

L. Yin, N. Vapiwala, D. Sutton, X. Ding, S. Swisher‐mcclure, V. Bui, Curtiland Deville, Z. Tochner, S. Both

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Pencil beam scanning proton therapy was found more sensitive to organ motion as compared to conventional IMRT. Significant target under dose may be caused by interfractional tumor motion. The objectives of this study are to investigate the role of endorectal balloon (ERB) in daily patient setup throughout the course of proton therapy and its dosimetric impact. Methods: Ten consecutive post‐prostatectomy patients enrolled on a prospective IRB approved institutional study were analyzed. Patients underwent CT/MRI simulation and treatment with daily ERB. Six T2‐MRI verification scans were performed during the treatment course. A pencil beam scanning proton therapy plan was generated for each patient. Organ at risks and CTVs were contoured by physician on each of the weekly MRI scans. The MRI scans were subsequently rigidly fused to the CT simulation images in order to simulate 2 possible daily kV‐kV patient setups: 1) alignment to bony anatomy and 2) alignment to pelvic bone in cranial caudal direction and ERB along the AP and lateral direction. The dosimetric impact of interfraction target motion on target coverage was compared for both scenarios. Results: We found that target interfraction motion in the AP direction (average 4.1mm) is consistently larger than those in the lateral and cranial caudal directions (2.9 mm and 3mm respectively) most likely due to variations in bladder volume. ERB can be used to further improve the patient bony alignment(∼1mm), in AP and lateral directions. Overall when both ERB pelvic bony structures are used for patient alignment, we observed a median 4.03% decrease in V98% of CTV as compared to 8.27% when only bony alignment is used. Conclusion: In post‐prostatectomy patients undergoing pencil beam scanning proton therapy, daily patient setup via bony alignment and ERB can stabilize the target and maintain the dose coverage within 5% relative to the initial treatment plans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Proton Therapy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pelvic Bones
Organs at Risk
Research Ethics Committees
Anatomy
Urinary Bladder
Therapeutics
Direction compound
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐J‐146 : Effectiveness of Daily Endorectal Balloon for Post‐Prostatectomy Patients Undergoing Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. / Yin, L.; Vapiwala, N.; Sutton, D.; Ding, X.; Swisher‐mcclure, S.; Bui, V.; Deville, Curtiland; Tochner, Z.; Both, S.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2013, p. 184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yin, L. ; Vapiwala, N. ; Sutton, D. ; Ding, X. ; Swisher‐mcclure, S. ; Bui, V. ; Deville, Curtiland ; Tochner, Z. ; Both, S. / SU‐E‐J‐146 : Effectiveness of Daily Endorectal Balloon for Post‐Prostatectomy Patients Undergoing Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. In: Medical Physics. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 184.
@article{70dda5c6eb104b7381f2827e347b9bd2,
title = "SU‐E‐J‐146: Effectiveness of Daily Endorectal Balloon for Post‐Prostatectomy Patients Undergoing Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy",
abstract = "Purpose: Pencil beam scanning proton therapy was found more sensitive to organ motion as compared to conventional IMRT. Significant target under dose may be caused by interfractional tumor motion. The objectives of this study are to investigate the role of endorectal balloon (ERB) in daily patient setup throughout the course of proton therapy and its dosimetric impact. Methods: Ten consecutive post‐prostatectomy patients enrolled on a prospective IRB approved institutional study were analyzed. Patients underwent CT/MRI simulation and treatment with daily ERB. Six T2‐MRI verification scans were performed during the treatment course. A pencil beam scanning proton therapy plan was generated for each patient. Organ at risks and CTVs were contoured by physician on each of the weekly MRI scans. The MRI scans were subsequently rigidly fused to the CT simulation images in order to simulate 2 possible daily kV‐kV patient setups: 1) alignment to bony anatomy and 2) alignment to pelvic bone in cranial caudal direction and ERB along the AP and lateral direction. The dosimetric impact of interfraction target motion on target coverage was compared for both scenarios. Results: We found that target interfraction motion in the AP direction (average 4.1mm) is consistently larger than those in the lateral and cranial caudal directions (2.9 mm and 3mm respectively) most likely due to variations in bladder volume. ERB can be used to further improve the patient bony alignment(∼1mm), in AP and lateral directions. Overall when both ERB pelvic bony structures are used for patient alignment, we observed a median 4.03{\%} decrease in V98{\%} of CTV as compared to 8.27{\%} when only bony alignment is used. Conclusion: In post‐prostatectomy patients undergoing pencil beam scanning proton therapy, daily patient setup via bony alignment and ERB can stabilize the target and maintain the dose coverage within 5{\%} relative to the initial treatment plans.",
author = "L. Yin and N. Vapiwala and D. Sutton and X. Ding and S. Swisher‐mcclure and V. Bui and Curtiland Deville and Z. Tochner and S. Both",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1118/1.4814358",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "184",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐J‐146

T2 - Effectiveness of Daily Endorectal Balloon for Post‐Prostatectomy Patients Undergoing Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy

AU - Yin, L.

AU - Vapiwala, N.

AU - Sutton, D.

AU - Ding, X.

AU - Swisher‐mcclure, S.

AU - Bui, V.

AU - Deville, Curtiland

AU - Tochner, Z.

AU - Both, S.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose: Pencil beam scanning proton therapy was found more sensitive to organ motion as compared to conventional IMRT. Significant target under dose may be caused by interfractional tumor motion. The objectives of this study are to investigate the role of endorectal balloon (ERB) in daily patient setup throughout the course of proton therapy and its dosimetric impact. Methods: Ten consecutive post‐prostatectomy patients enrolled on a prospective IRB approved institutional study were analyzed. Patients underwent CT/MRI simulation and treatment with daily ERB. Six T2‐MRI verification scans were performed during the treatment course. A pencil beam scanning proton therapy plan was generated for each patient. Organ at risks and CTVs were contoured by physician on each of the weekly MRI scans. The MRI scans were subsequently rigidly fused to the CT simulation images in order to simulate 2 possible daily kV‐kV patient setups: 1) alignment to bony anatomy and 2) alignment to pelvic bone in cranial caudal direction and ERB along the AP and lateral direction. The dosimetric impact of interfraction target motion on target coverage was compared for both scenarios. Results: We found that target interfraction motion in the AP direction (average 4.1mm) is consistently larger than those in the lateral and cranial caudal directions (2.9 mm and 3mm respectively) most likely due to variations in bladder volume. ERB can be used to further improve the patient bony alignment(∼1mm), in AP and lateral directions. Overall when both ERB pelvic bony structures are used for patient alignment, we observed a median 4.03% decrease in V98% of CTV as compared to 8.27% when only bony alignment is used. Conclusion: In post‐prostatectomy patients undergoing pencil beam scanning proton therapy, daily patient setup via bony alignment and ERB can stabilize the target and maintain the dose coverage within 5% relative to the initial treatment plans.

AB - Purpose: Pencil beam scanning proton therapy was found more sensitive to organ motion as compared to conventional IMRT. Significant target under dose may be caused by interfractional tumor motion. The objectives of this study are to investigate the role of endorectal balloon (ERB) in daily patient setup throughout the course of proton therapy and its dosimetric impact. Methods: Ten consecutive post‐prostatectomy patients enrolled on a prospective IRB approved institutional study were analyzed. Patients underwent CT/MRI simulation and treatment with daily ERB. Six T2‐MRI verification scans were performed during the treatment course. A pencil beam scanning proton therapy plan was generated for each patient. Organ at risks and CTVs were contoured by physician on each of the weekly MRI scans. The MRI scans were subsequently rigidly fused to the CT simulation images in order to simulate 2 possible daily kV‐kV patient setups: 1) alignment to bony anatomy and 2) alignment to pelvic bone in cranial caudal direction and ERB along the AP and lateral direction. The dosimetric impact of interfraction target motion on target coverage was compared for both scenarios. Results: We found that target interfraction motion in the AP direction (average 4.1mm) is consistently larger than those in the lateral and cranial caudal directions (2.9 mm and 3mm respectively) most likely due to variations in bladder volume. ERB can be used to further improve the patient bony alignment(∼1mm), in AP and lateral directions. Overall when both ERB pelvic bony structures are used for patient alignment, we observed a median 4.03% decrease in V98% of CTV as compared to 8.27% when only bony alignment is used. Conclusion: In post‐prostatectomy patients undergoing pencil beam scanning proton therapy, daily patient setup via bony alignment and ERB can stabilize the target and maintain the dose coverage within 5% relative to the initial treatment plans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024781748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024781748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4814358

DO - 10.1118/1.4814358

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024781748

VL - 40

SP - 184

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -