Success and limitations of a naked plasmid transfection protocol for keratinocyte growth factor-1 to enhance cutaneous wound healing

Colman K. Byrnes, Faisal H. Khan, Petra H. Nass, Chehada Hatoum, Mark D. Duncan, John W. Harmon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Our group and others have previously reported enhancement of cutaneous wound healing following the transfection of tissue with plasmid vectors expressing the DNA for growth factors. In these experiments, growth factor treated animals were usually compared to animals treated with control plasmid vector. To achieve consistent transfection, high DNA plasmid load and repeated penetrations of the wound by needle or gene gun were required. In the current experiments, we assessed the effect of the plasmid load and repeated tissue penetrations on wound healing of excisional wounds in diabetic C57 mice. Animals received 5 mm excisional wounds, and were assigned to the following groups, no treatment, phosphate buffered saline solution injections, and plasmid vector injection with and without the keratinocyte growth factor-1 gene. Intradermal injections of 100μg plasmid were given adjacent to the wounds at days 1-5, 7 and 11, At day 9, wound closure was more advanced in keratinocyte growth factor-1 treated animals compared to those treated with control plasmid. But a detrimental effect of the DNA plasmid injection was evident from a comparison of the DNA control group versus the non-injected group. Therefore, the challenge for developing an effective system for the enhancement of wound healing lies in improving transfection efficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-346
Number of pages6
JournalWound Repair and Regeneration
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Success and limitations of a naked plasmid transfection protocol for keratinocyte growth factor-1 to enhance cutaneous wound healing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this