Subjektive Graduierung von Barrett-Neoplasien durch den Pathologen: Korrelation mit objektiven histomorphometrischen Variablen

Translated title of the contribution: Subjective grading of Barrett's neoplasia by pathologists: Correlation with objective histomorphometric variables

E. Sabo, G. Klorin, Elizabeth A Montgomery, K. C. Drumea, O. Ben-Izhak, J. Lachter, M. Vieth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Even though pathologists are trained to recognize the same histological features for the diagnosis and grading of different histological images, not all pathologists are influenced to a similar level of intensity by the same morphological characteristics of the tissue when scoring Barrett's dysplasia/neoplasia. The variables which most pathologists have intuitively chosen to use for scoring of the severity of Barrett's changes are mainly those related to the general tissue architecture, such as nuclear crowding, orientation and stratification. Interestingly, nuclear size is not used by most pathologists but nuclear pleomorphism and symmetry does influence a significant number of pathologists. Maybe the most difficult variables for the human eye to recognize are variables of chromatin texture (such as margination or heterogeneity), the predictive importance of which has been demonstrated in a previously published work. Textural variables may therefore remain the subject of a computerized analysis. Nevertheless, the fact that a few pathologists do actually correlate with nuclear texture in scoring, argues in favor of making further attempts to train pathologists to also rely on texture, similar to cytologists, when scoring Barrett's dysplasia.

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)133-137
Number of pages5
JournalPathologe
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Crowding
Pathologists
Chromatin

Keywords

  • Barrett's syndrome
  • Dysplasia
  • Esophagus
  • Histomorphometry
  • Image analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Subjektive Graduierung von Barrett-Neoplasien durch den Pathologen : Korrelation mit objektiven histomorphometrischen Variablen. / Sabo, E.; Klorin, G.; Montgomery, Elizabeth A; Drumea, K. C.; Ben-Izhak, O.; Lachter, J.; Vieth, M.

In: Pathologe, Vol. 34, No. 2, 03.2013, p. 133-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sabo, E. ; Klorin, G. ; Montgomery, Elizabeth A ; Drumea, K. C. ; Ben-Izhak, O. ; Lachter, J. ; Vieth, M. / Subjektive Graduierung von Barrett-Neoplasien durch den Pathologen : Korrelation mit objektiven histomorphometrischen Variablen. In: Pathologe. 2013 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 133-137.
@article{91e876abf36e42f890d5ed4f90ccec12,
title = "Subjektive Graduierung von Barrett-Neoplasien durch den Pathologen: Korrelation mit objektiven histomorphometrischen Variablen",
abstract = "Even though pathologists are trained to recognize the same histological features for the diagnosis and grading of different histological images, not all pathologists are influenced to a similar level of intensity by the same morphological characteristics of the tissue when scoring Barrett's dysplasia/neoplasia. The variables which most pathologists have intuitively chosen to use for scoring of the severity of Barrett's changes are mainly those related to the general tissue architecture, such as nuclear crowding, orientation and stratification. Interestingly, nuclear size is not used by most pathologists but nuclear pleomorphism and symmetry does influence a significant number of pathologists. Maybe the most difficult variables for the human eye to recognize are variables of chromatin texture (such as margination or heterogeneity), the predictive importance of which has been demonstrated in a previously published work. Textural variables may therefore remain the subject of a computerized analysis. Nevertheless, the fact that a few pathologists do actually correlate with nuclear texture in scoring, argues in favor of making further attempts to train pathologists to also rely on texture, similar to cytologists, when scoring Barrett's dysplasia.",
keywords = "Barrett's syndrome, Dysplasia, Esophagus, Histomorphometry, Image analysis",
author = "E. Sabo and G. Klorin and Montgomery, {Elizabeth A} and Drumea, {K. C.} and O. Ben-Izhak and J. Lachter and M. Vieth",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s00292-012-1732-3",
language = "German",
volume = "34",
pages = "133--137",
journal = "Der Pathologe",
issn = "0172-8113",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subjektive Graduierung von Barrett-Neoplasien durch den Pathologen

T2 - Korrelation mit objektiven histomorphometrischen Variablen

AU - Sabo, E.

AU - Klorin, G.

AU - Montgomery, Elizabeth A

AU - Drumea, K. C.

AU - Ben-Izhak, O.

AU - Lachter, J.

AU - Vieth, M.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Even though pathologists are trained to recognize the same histological features for the diagnosis and grading of different histological images, not all pathologists are influenced to a similar level of intensity by the same morphological characteristics of the tissue when scoring Barrett's dysplasia/neoplasia. The variables which most pathologists have intuitively chosen to use for scoring of the severity of Barrett's changes are mainly those related to the general tissue architecture, such as nuclear crowding, orientation and stratification. Interestingly, nuclear size is not used by most pathologists but nuclear pleomorphism and symmetry does influence a significant number of pathologists. Maybe the most difficult variables for the human eye to recognize are variables of chromatin texture (such as margination or heterogeneity), the predictive importance of which has been demonstrated in a previously published work. Textural variables may therefore remain the subject of a computerized analysis. Nevertheless, the fact that a few pathologists do actually correlate with nuclear texture in scoring, argues in favor of making further attempts to train pathologists to also rely on texture, similar to cytologists, when scoring Barrett's dysplasia.

AB - Even though pathologists are trained to recognize the same histological features for the diagnosis and grading of different histological images, not all pathologists are influenced to a similar level of intensity by the same morphological characteristics of the tissue when scoring Barrett's dysplasia/neoplasia. The variables which most pathologists have intuitively chosen to use for scoring of the severity of Barrett's changes are mainly those related to the general tissue architecture, such as nuclear crowding, orientation and stratification. Interestingly, nuclear size is not used by most pathologists but nuclear pleomorphism and symmetry does influence a significant number of pathologists. Maybe the most difficult variables for the human eye to recognize are variables of chromatin texture (such as margination or heterogeneity), the predictive importance of which has been demonstrated in a previously published work. Textural variables may therefore remain the subject of a computerized analysis. Nevertheless, the fact that a few pathologists do actually correlate with nuclear texture in scoring, argues in favor of making further attempts to train pathologists to also rely on texture, similar to cytologists, when scoring Barrett's dysplasia.

KW - Barrett's syndrome

KW - Dysplasia

KW - Esophagus

KW - Histomorphometry

KW - Image analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879885576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879885576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00292-012-1732-3

DO - 10.1007/s00292-012-1732-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 23400731

AN - SCOPUS:84879885576

VL - 34

SP - 133

EP - 137

JO - Der Pathologe

JF - Der Pathologe

SN - 0172-8113

IS - 2

ER -