Studies on the relationship between toxin-anaphylaxis and antitoxic immunity: I. quantitative studies on the toxin-anaphylaxis in vitro

Kimishige Ishizaka, Teruko Ishizaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

1) Inhibition due to antigen excess or antibody excess was not observed in the anaphylactic contraction of guinea pig intestine. 2) The more the amount of antitoxin exsisted in the tissues, the less amount of toxoid is required to cause the anaphylactic contraction of the same intensity. Moreover, a certain correlation is assumed between the amount of antitoxin in the tissues and the reciprocal of the dosis of toxoid required to cause the anaphylactic contraction. 3) Non-precipitating antitoxin of guinea pig is incapable of sensitizing guinea pig intestine. The authors wish to express their gratitude for cordial guidance of Prof. K. Nakamura of the National Institute of Health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-653
Number of pages13
JournalJapanese Journal of Medical Science and Biology
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1954
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Antitoxins
Anaphylaxis
Toxoids
Immunity
Guinea Pigs
Intestines
Tissue
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Health
Antigens
Antibodies
In Vitro Techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Studies on the relationship between toxin-anaphylaxis and antitoxic immunity : I. quantitative studies on the toxin-anaphylaxis in vitro. / Ishizaka, Kimishige; Ishizaka, Teruko.

In: Japanese Journal of Medical Science and Biology, Vol. 7, No. 6, 1954, p. 641-653.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{51ca9b5eb4144988ad7b241d339e76b2,
title = "Studies on the relationship between toxin-anaphylaxis and antitoxic immunity: I. quantitative studies on the toxin-anaphylaxis in vitro",
abstract = "1) Inhibition due to antigen excess or antibody excess was not observed in the anaphylactic contraction of guinea pig intestine. 2) The more the amount of antitoxin exsisted in the tissues, the less amount of toxoid is required to cause the anaphylactic contraction of the same intensity. Moreover, a certain correlation is assumed between the amount of antitoxin in the tissues and the reciprocal of the dosis of toxoid required to cause the anaphylactic contraction. 3) Non-precipitating antitoxin of guinea pig is incapable of sensitizing guinea pig intestine. The authors wish to express their gratitude for cordial guidance of Prof. K. Nakamura of the National Institute of Health.",
author = "Kimishige Ishizaka and Teruko Ishizaka",
year = "1954",
doi = "10.7883/yoken1952.7.641",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "641--653",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases",
issn = "1344-6304",
publisher = "National Institute of Health",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Studies on the relationship between toxin-anaphylaxis and antitoxic immunity

T2 - I. quantitative studies on the toxin-anaphylaxis in vitro

AU - Ishizaka, Kimishige

AU - Ishizaka, Teruko

PY - 1954

Y1 - 1954

N2 - 1) Inhibition due to antigen excess or antibody excess was not observed in the anaphylactic contraction of guinea pig intestine. 2) The more the amount of antitoxin exsisted in the tissues, the less amount of toxoid is required to cause the anaphylactic contraction of the same intensity. Moreover, a certain correlation is assumed between the amount of antitoxin in the tissues and the reciprocal of the dosis of toxoid required to cause the anaphylactic contraction. 3) Non-precipitating antitoxin of guinea pig is incapable of sensitizing guinea pig intestine. The authors wish to express their gratitude for cordial guidance of Prof. K. Nakamura of the National Institute of Health.

AB - 1) Inhibition due to antigen excess or antibody excess was not observed in the anaphylactic contraction of guinea pig intestine. 2) The more the amount of antitoxin exsisted in the tissues, the less amount of toxoid is required to cause the anaphylactic contraction of the same intensity. Moreover, a certain correlation is assumed between the amount of antitoxin in the tissues and the reciprocal of the dosis of toxoid required to cause the anaphylactic contraction. 3) Non-precipitating antitoxin of guinea pig is incapable of sensitizing guinea pig intestine. The authors wish to express their gratitude for cordial guidance of Prof. K. Nakamura of the National Institute of Health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960992149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960992149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7883/yoken1952.7.641

DO - 10.7883/yoken1952.7.641

M3 - Article

C2 - 13251775

AN - SCOPUS:84960992149

VL - 7

SP - 641

EP - 653

JO - Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases

JF - Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases

SN - 1344-6304

IS - 6

ER -