Strategic Review Process for an Accountable Care Organization and Emerging Accountable Care Best Practices

Sarah Johnson Conway, Sarah Himmelrich, Scott A. Feeser, John A. Flynn, Steven J Kravet, Jennifer Bailey, Lindsay C. Hebert, Susan H. Donovan, Sarah G. Kachur, Patricia M.C. Brown, William A Baumgartner, Scott Berkowitz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), like other care entities, must be strategic about which initiatives they support in the quest for higher value. This article reviews the current strategic planning process for the Johns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients (JMAP), a Medicare Shared Savings Program Track 1 ACO. It reviews the 3 focus areas for the 2017 strategic review process - (1) optimizing care coordination for complex, at-risk patients, (2) post-acute care, and (3) specialty care integration - reviewing cost savings and quality improvement opportunities, associated best practices from the literature, and opportunities to leverage and advance existing ACO and health system efforts in each area. It then reviews the ultimate selection of priorities for the coming year and early thoughts on implementation. After the robust review process, key stakeholders voted to select interventions targeted at care coordination, post-acute care, and specialty integration including Part B drug and imaging costs. The interventions selected incorporate a mixture of enhancing current ACO initiatives, working collaboratively and synergistically on other health system initiatives, and taking on new projects deemed targeted, cost-effective, and manageable in scope. The annual strategic review has been an essential and iterative process based on performance data and informed by the collective experience of other organizations. The process allows for an evidence-based strategic plan for the ACO in pursuit of the best care for patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-365
Number of pages9
JournalPopulation Health Management
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Accountable Care Organizations
Practice Guidelines
Subacute Care
Drug Costs
Cost Savings
Coordination Complexes
Health
Medicare
Quality Improvement
Patient Care
Medicine
Organizations
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • accountable care organization
  • care delivery system
  • coordinated care
  • Medicare
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Strategic Review Process for an Accountable Care Organization and Emerging Accountable Care Best Practices. / Johnson Conway, Sarah; Himmelrich, Sarah; Feeser, Scott A.; Flynn, John A.; Kravet, Steven J; Bailey, Jennifer; Hebert, Lindsay C.; Donovan, Susan H.; Kachur, Sarah G.; Brown, Patricia M.C.; Baumgartner, William A; Berkowitz, Scott.

In: Population Health Management, Vol. 21, No. 5, 01.10.2018, p. 357-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Johnson Conway, Sarah ; Himmelrich, Sarah ; Feeser, Scott A. ; Flynn, John A. ; Kravet, Steven J ; Bailey, Jennifer ; Hebert, Lindsay C. ; Donovan, Susan H. ; Kachur, Sarah G. ; Brown, Patricia M.C. ; Baumgartner, William A ; Berkowitz, Scott. / Strategic Review Process for an Accountable Care Organization and Emerging Accountable Care Best Practices. In: Population Health Management. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 357-365.
@article{6809512b2f964afea1a15e7946956298,
title = "Strategic Review Process for an Accountable Care Organization and Emerging Accountable Care Best Practices",
abstract = "Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), like other care entities, must be strategic about which initiatives they support in the quest for higher value. This article reviews the current strategic planning process for the Johns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients (JMAP), a Medicare Shared Savings Program Track 1 ACO. It reviews the 3 focus areas for the 2017 strategic review process - (1) optimizing care coordination for complex, at-risk patients, (2) post-acute care, and (3) specialty care integration - reviewing cost savings and quality improvement opportunities, associated best practices from the literature, and opportunities to leverage and advance existing ACO and health system efforts in each area. It then reviews the ultimate selection of priorities for the coming year and early thoughts on implementation. After the robust review process, key stakeholders voted to select interventions targeted at care coordination, post-acute care, and specialty integration including Part B drug and imaging costs. The interventions selected incorporate a mixture of enhancing current ACO initiatives, working collaboratively and synergistically on other health system initiatives, and taking on new projects deemed targeted, cost-effective, and manageable in scope. The annual strategic review has been an essential and iterative process based on performance data and informed by the collective experience of other organizations. The process allows for an evidence-based strategic plan for the ACO in pursuit of the best care for patients.",
keywords = "accountable care organization, care delivery system, coordinated care, Medicare, quality improvement",
author = "{Johnson Conway}, Sarah and Sarah Himmelrich and Feeser, {Scott A.} and Flynn, {John A.} and Kravet, {Steven J} and Jennifer Bailey and Hebert, {Lindsay C.} and Donovan, {Susan H.} and Kachur, {Sarah G.} and Brown, {Patricia M.C.} and Baumgartner, {William A} and Scott Berkowitz",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/pop.2017.0149",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "357--365",
journal = "Population Health Management",
issn = "1942-7891",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategic Review Process for an Accountable Care Organization and Emerging Accountable Care Best Practices

AU - Johnson Conway, Sarah

AU - Himmelrich, Sarah

AU - Feeser, Scott A.

AU - Flynn, John A.

AU - Kravet, Steven J

AU - Bailey, Jennifer

AU - Hebert, Lindsay C.

AU - Donovan, Susan H.

AU - Kachur, Sarah G.

AU - Brown, Patricia M.C.

AU - Baumgartner, William A

AU - Berkowitz, Scott

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), like other care entities, must be strategic about which initiatives they support in the quest for higher value. This article reviews the current strategic planning process for the Johns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients (JMAP), a Medicare Shared Savings Program Track 1 ACO. It reviews the 3 focus areas for the 2017 strategic review process - (1) optimizing care coordination for complex, at-risk patients, (2) post-acute care, and (3) specialty care integration - reviewing cost savings and quality improvement opportunities, associated best practices from the literature, and opportunities to leverage and advance existing ACO and health system efforts in each area. It then reviews the ultimate selection of priorities for the coming year and early thoughts on implementation. After the robust review process, key stakeholders voted to select interventions targeted at care coordination, post-acute care, and specialty integration including Part B drug and imaging costs. The interventions selected incorporate a mixture of enhancing current ACO initiatives, working collaboratively and synergistically on other health system initiatives, and taking on new projects deemed targeted, cost-effective, and manageable in scope. The annual strategic review has been an essential and iterative process based on performance data and informed by the collective experience of other organizations. The process allows for an evidence-based strategic plan for the ACO in pursuit of the best care for patients.

AB - Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), like other care entities, must be strategic about which initiatives they support in the quest for higher value. This article reviews the current strategic planning process for the Johns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients (JMAP), a Medicare Shared Savings Program Track 1 ACO. It reviews the 3 focus areas for the 2017 strategic review process - (1) optimizing care coordination for complex, at-risk patients, (2) post-acute care, and (3) specialty care integration - reviewing cost savings and quality improvement opportunities, associated best practices from the literature, and opportunities to leverage and advance existing ACO and health system efforts in each area. It then reviews the ultimate selection of priorities for the coming year and early thoughts on implementation. After the robust review process, key stakeholders voted to select interventions targeted at care coordination, post-acute care, and specialty integration including Part B drug and imaging costs. The interventions selected incorporate a mixture of enhancing current ACO initiatives, working collaboratively and synergistically on other health system initiatives, and taking on new projects deemed targeted, cost-effective, and manageable in scope. The annual strategic review has been an essential and iterative process based on performance data and informed by the collective experience of other organizations. The process allows for an evidence-based strategic plan for the ACO in pursuit of the best care for patients.

KW - accountable care organization

KW - care delivery system

KW - coordinated care

KW - Medicare

KW - quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054657072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054657072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/pop.2017.0149

DO - 10.1089/pop.2017.0149

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29393824

AN - SCOPUS:85054657072

VL - 21

SP - 357

EP - 365

JO - Population Health Management

JF - Population Health Management

SN - 1942-7891

IS - 5

ER -