Stereoscopic endoscopy: Is one eye better or two?

B. J. Pollack, A. Chak, Marcia Canto, G. S. Cooper, B. F. Remler, J. Izatt, M. V. Sivak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A prototype stereoscopic (stereo) endoscope that employs a double charge-coupled device system has been shown to be highly accurate in measuring size via computer generated derivations. Whether stereovision allows an endoscopist to become more accurate and adept has not been determined. Aims: 1) To modify an existing prototype endoscope so that it provides an endoscopist with stereovision. 2) To evaluate whether stereovision enhances endoscopic performance. Methods: 19 subjects (6 Gl attendings, 6 Gl fellows, 7 non-endoscopists) were fitted with a headset designed for virtual reality applications in which video signals were fed via separate monitors to each eye. Subjects were tested using both the stereo system and a monocular (mono) videoendoscopic system fitted with the identical headset. Subjects were randomly assigned to either stereo or mono systems and then crossed over to testing in the other system at a minimum of 15 days between testing sessions (mean = 41 days). Standardized spatial, motor-dexterity, visual acuity and binocular eye exams were performed in each subject. Testing was performed within a 2′× 3′ model with objects and tasks placed at different positions within the system. Performance of a specific manual task, accuracy of size estimates, depth perception and speed of performance were evaluated. Results: Visual tests revealed no significant abnormalities in acuity; however, 3 subjects had minor abnormalities in binocular vision in the near field. There was no correlation between visual, spatial or dexterity testing and endoscopic performance. Comfort, resolution and color reproduction of the head-mounted display optics was acceptable to most participants although a small number of participants (4 stereo, 5 mono) experienced nausea during the testing procedure. There was no significant difference between stereo and mono testing with regards to accuracy of performance of a specified task (knocking wooden-blocks over), estimates of size (12 objects, range from 3.1 mm to 37.7 mm), depth perception (7 objects) or speed (total and task-related) of performance. Conclusions: 1) The current prototype stereoendoscope can be interfaced with a lightweight, head-mounted display providing fused stereo images. 2) Performance on standardized spatial, manual-dexterity or binocular visual tests did not correlate with endoscopic performance. 3) As compared to monocular viewing, stereoendoscopy did not yield a significantly superior accuracy of performance of a specified task, estimate of size, depth perception or speed of performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume45
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Depth Perception
Endoscopy
Endoscopes
Size Perception
Head
Binocular Vision
Task Performance and Analysis
Nausea
Visual Acuity
Reproduction
Color
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Pollack, B. J., Chak, A., Canto, M., Cooper, G. S., Remler, B. F., Izatt, J., & Sivak, M. V. (1997). Stereoscopic endoscopy: Is one eye better or two? Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 45(4).

Stereoscopic endoscopy : Is one eye better or two? / Pollack, B. J.; Chak, A.; Canto, Marcia; Cooper, G. S.; Remler, B. F.; Izatt, J.; Sivak, M. V.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 45, No. 4, 1997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pollack, BJ, Chak, A, Canto, M, Cooper, GS, Remler, BF, Izatt, J & Sivak, MV 1997, 'Stereoscopic endoscopy: Is one eye better or two?', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 45, no. 4.
Pollack BJ, Chak A, Canto M, Cooper GS, Remler BF, Izatt J et al. Stereoscopic endoscopy: Is one eye better or two? Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1997;45(4).
Pollack, B. J. ; Chak, A. ; Canto, Marcia ; Cooper, G. S. ; Remler, B. F. ; Izatt, J. ; Sivak, M. V. / Stereoscopic endoscopy : Is one eye better or two?. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1997 ; Vol. 45, No. 4.
@article{49ab464e441743ceb17bae40c0f8d745,
title = "Stereoscopic endoscopy: Is one eye better or two?",
abstract = "A prototype stereoscopic (stereo) endoscope that employs a double charge-coupled device system has been shown to be highly accurate in measuring size via computer generated derivations. Whether stereovision allows an endoscopist to become more accurate and adept has not been determined. Aims: 1) To modify an existing prototype endoscope so that it provides an endoscopist with stereovision. 2) To evaluate whether stereovision enhances endoscopic performance. Methods: 19 subjects (6 Gl attendings, 6 Gl fellows, 7 non-endoscopists) were fitted with a headset designed for virtual reality applications in which video signals were fed via separate monitors to each eye. Subjects were tested using both the stereo system and a monocular (mono) videoendoscopic system fitted with the identical headset. Subjects were randomly assigned to either stereo or mono systems and then crossed over to testing in the other system at a minimum of 15 days between testing sessions (mean = 41 days). Standardized spatial, motor-dexterity, visual acuity and binocular eye exams were performed in each subject. Testing was performed within a 2′× 3′ model with objects and tasks placed at different positions within the system. Performance of a specific manual task, accuracy of size estimates, depth perception and speed of performance were evaluated. Results: Visual tests revealed no significant abnormalities in acuity; however, 3 subjects had minor abnormalities in binocular vision in the near field. There was no correlation between visual, spatial or dexterity testing and endoscopic performance. Comfort, resolution and color reproduction of the head-mounted display optics was acceptable to most participants although a small number of participants (4 stereo, 5 mono) experienced nausea during the testing procedure. There was no significant difference between stereo and mono testing with regards to accuracy of performance of a specified task (knocking wooden-blocks over), estimates of size (12 objects, range from 3.1 mm to 37.7 mm), depth perception (7 objects) or speed (total and task-related) of performance. Conclusions: 1) The current prototype stereoendoscope can be interfaced with a lightweight, head-mounted display providing fused stereo images. 2) Performance on standardized spatial, manual-dexterity or binocular visual tests did not correlate with endoscopic performance. 3) As compared to monocular viewing, stereoendoscopy did not yield a significantly superior accuracy of performance of a specified task, estimate of size, depth perception or speed of performance.",
author = "Pollack, {B. J.} and A. Chak and Marcia Canto and Cooper, {G. S.} and Remler, {B. F.} and J. Izatt and Sivak, {M. V.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stereoscopic endoscopy

T2 - Is one eye better or two?

AU - Pollack, B. J.

AU - Chak, A.

AU - Canto, Marcia

AU - Cooper, G. S.

AU - Remler, B. F.

AU - Izatt, J.

AU - Sivak, M. V.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - A prototype stereoscopic (stereo) endoscope that employs a double charge-coupled device system has been shown to be highly accurate in measuring size via computer generated derivations. Whether stereovision allows an endoscopist to become more accurate and adept has not been determined. Aims: 1) To modify an existing prototype endoscope so that it provides an endoscopist with stereovision. 2) To evaluate whether stereovision enhances endoscopic performance. Methods: 19 subjects (6 Gl attendings, 6 Gl fellows, 7 non-endoscopists) were fitted with a headset designed for virtual reality applications in which video signals were fed via separate monitors to each eye. Subjects were tested using both the stereo system and a monocular (mono) videoendoscopic system fitted with the identical headset. Subjects were randomly assigned to either stereo or mono systems and then crossed over to testing in the other system at a minimum of 15 days between testing sessions (mean = 41 days). Standardized spatial, motor-dexterity, visual acuity and binocular eye exams were performed in each subject. Testing was performed within a 2′× 3′ model with objects and tasks placed at different positions within the system. Performance of a specific manual task, accuracy of size estimates, depth perception and speed of performance were evaluated. Results: Visual tests revealed no significant abnormalities in acuity; however, 3 subjects had minor abnormalities in binocular vision in the near field. There was no correlation between visual, spatial or dexterity testing and endoscopic performance. Comfort, resolution and color reproduction of the head-mounted display optics was acceptable to most participants although a small number of participants (4 stereo, 5 mono) experienced nausea during the testing procedure. There was no significant difference between stereo and mono testing with regards to accuracy of performance of a specified task (knocking wooden-blocks over), estimates of size (12 objects, range from 3.1 mm to 37.7 mm), depth perception (7 objects) or speed (total and task-related) of performance. Conclusions: 1) The current prototype stereoendoscope can be interfaced with a lightweight, head-mounted display providing fused stereo images. 2) Performance on standardized spatial, manual-dexterity or binocular visual tests did not correlate with endoscopic performance. 3) As compared to monocular viewing, stereoendoscopy did not yield a significantly superior accuracy of performance of a specified task, estimate of size, depth perception or speed of performance.

AB - A prototype stereoscopic (stereo) endoscope that employs a double charge-coupled device system has been shown to be highly accurate in measuring size via computer generated derivations. Whether stereovision allows an endoscopist to become more accurate and adept has not been determined. Aims: 1) To modify an existing prototype endoscope so that it provides an endoscopist with stereovision. 2) To evaluate whether stereovision enhances endoscopic performance. Methods: 19 subjects (6 Gl attendings, 6 Gl fellows, 7 non-endoscopists) were fitted with a headset designed for virtual reality applications in which video signals were fed via separate monitors to each eye. Subjects were tested using both the stereo system and a monocular (mono) videoendoscopic system fitted with the identical headset. Subjects were randomly assigned to either stereo or mono systems and then crossed over to testing in the other system at a minimum of 15 days between testing sessions (mean = 41 days). Standardized spatial, motor-dexterity, visual acuity and binocular eye exams were performed in each subject. Testing was performed within a 2′× 3′ model with objects and tasks placed at different positions within the system. Performance of a specific manual task, accuracy of size estimates, depth perception and speed of performance were evaluated. Results: Visual tests revealed no significant abnormalities in acuity; however, 3 subjects had minor abnormalities in binocular vision in the near field. There was no correlation between visual, spatial or dexterity testing and endoscopic performance. Comfort, resolution and color reproduction of the head-mounted display optics was acceptable to most participants although a small number of participants (4 stereo, 5 mono) experienced nausea during the testing procedure. There was no significant difference between stereo and mono testing with regards to accuracy of performance of a specified task (knocking wooden-blocks over), estimates of size (12 objects, range from 3.1 mm to 37.7 mm), depth perception (7 objects) or speed (total and task-related) of performance. Conclusions: 1) The current prototype stereoendoscope can be interfaced with a lightweight, head-mounted display providing fused stereo images. 2) Performance on standardized spatial, manual-dexterity or binocular visual tests did not correlate with endoscopic performance. 3) As compared to monocular viewing, stereoendoscopy did not yield a significantly superior accuracy of performance of a specified task, estimate of size, depth perception or speed of performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748986535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748986535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748986535

VL - 45

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -