Stem cells in burn wound healing: A systematic review of the literature

Ali R. Ahmadi, Maria Chicco, Jinny Huang, Le Qi, James Burdick, George M Williams, Andrew M. Cameron, Zhaoli Sun

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Severe burns are often associated with high morbidity and unsatisfactory functional and esthetic outcomes. Over the last two decades, stem cells have generated great hopes for the treatment of numerous conditions including burns. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the role of stem cell therapy as a means to promote burn wound healing. Methods: Comprehensive searches in major databases were carried out in March 2017 for articles on stem cell therapy in burn wound healing. In total 2103 articles were identified and screened on the basis of pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Fifteen experimental and two clinical studies were included in the review. The majority of studies reported significant improvement in macroscopic burn wound appearance as well as a trend toward improved microscopic appearance, after stem cell therapy. Other parameters evaluated, such as re-vascularization, collagen formation, level of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators, apoptosis and cellular infiltrates, yielded heterogeneous results across studies. Conclusion: Stem cell therapy appears to exert a positive effect in burn wound healing. There is, therefore, justification for continued efforts to evaluate the use of stem cells as an adjunct to first-line therapies in burns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1014-1023
Number of pages10
JournalBurns
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2019

Keywords

  • Burns
  • Skin
  • Skin regeneration
  • Stem cells
  • Systematic review
  • Wound healing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stem cells in burn wound healing: A systematic review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this