Statistical models in morphometrics: Are they realistic?

Subhash Lele, Joan T. Richtsmeier

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This analysis considers the validity of the assumptions of the Gaussian perturbation model as applied to landmark data collected for morphometric analyses. The primary conclusion is that the assumption of homoscedasticity is unrealistic when applied to biological data sets. We also point out some important difficulties associated with alternate models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSystematic Zoology
Pages60-69
Number of pages10
Volume39
Edition1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics

Cite this

Lele, S., & Richtsmeier, J. T. (1990). Statistical models in morphometrics: Are they realistic? In Systematic Zoology (1 ed., Vol. 39, pp. 60-69) https://doi.org/10.2307/2992208