State medical marijuana laws and the prevalence of opioids detected among fatally injured drivers

June H. Kim, Julian Santaella-Tenorio, Christine Mauro, Julia Wrobel, Magdalena Cerda, Katherine M. Keyes, Deborah Hasin, Silvia S. Martins, Guohua Li

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives. To assess the association between medical marijuana laws (MMLs) and the odds of a positive opioid test, an indicator for prior use. Methods. We analyzed 1999-2013 Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) data from 18 states that tested for alcohol and other drugs in at least 80% of drivers who died within 1 hour of crashing (n = 68 394). Within-state and between-state comparisons assessed opioid positivity among drivers crashing in states with an operational MML (i.e., allowances for home cultivation or active dispensaries) versus drivers crashing in states before a future MML was operational. Results. State-specific estimates indicated a reduction in opioid positivity for most states after implementation of an operational MML, although none of these estimates were significant. When we combined states, we observed no significant overall association (odds ratio [OR] = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.61, 1.03). However, age-stratified analyses indicated a significant reduction in opioid positivity for drivers aged 21 to 40 years (OR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.37, 0.67; interaction P < .001). Conclusions. Operational MMLs are associated with reductions in opioid positivity among 21-to 40-year-old fatally injured drivers and may reduce opioid use and overdose.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2032-2037
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican journal of public health
Volume106
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'State medical marijuana laws and the prevalence of opioids detected among fatally injured drivers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this