Standardised metrics for global surgical surveillance

Thomas G. Weiser, Martin A. Makary, Alex B. Haynes, Gerald Dziekan, William R. Berry, Atui A. Gawande, Iraq Ali Sindi, Teodoro Herbosa, Julie Storr, Clifford Y. Ko, Lola Jean Kozak, Bruce Barraclough, Richard K. Reznick, Bryce Taylor, Sudhir Joseph, Abdel Hadi S. Breizat, Alan F. Merry, Marie Carmela M. Lapitan, Liam Donaldson, Pauline PhilipPascience L. Kibatala, Iskender Sayek, Lord Ara Darzi, Krishna Moorthy, E. Patchen Dellinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Public health surveillance relies on standardised metrics to evaluate disease burden and health system performance. Such metrics have not been developed for surgical services despite increasing volume, substantial cost, and high rates of death and disability associated with surgery. The Safe Surgery Saves Lives initiative of WHO's Patient Safety Programme has developed standardised public health metrics for surgical care that are applicable worldwide. We assembled an international panel of experts to develop and define metrics for measuring the magnitude and effect of surgical care in a population, while taking into account economic feasibility and practicability. This panel recommended six measures for assessing surgical services at a national level: number of operating rooms, number of operations, number of accredited surgeons, number of accredited anaesthesia professionals, day-of-surgery death ratio, and postoperative in-hospital death ratio. We assessed the feasibility of gathering such statistics at eight diverse hospitals in eight countries and incorporated them into the WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery, in which methods for data collection, analysis, and reporting are outlined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1113-1117
Number of pages5
JournalThe Lancet
Volume374
Issue number9695
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Standardised metrics for global surgical surveillance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this