Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: How will we measure success?

Danielle C. Lavallee, Carla J. Williams, Ellen S. Tambor, Patricia A. Deverka

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research continues to gain national attention. While various methods are used to gather stakeholder expertise and form recommendations, evaluation of the stakeholder experience is often missing. The lack of evaluation prohibits assessing how effective and meaningful engagement practices are for enhancing research efforts and limits the ability to identify areas for future improvement. We propose that an evaluation plan of engagement processes be developed before stakeholder involvement begins and be required as part of a request for proposal or research grant where stakeholder input is being sought. Furthermore, we recommend the inclusion of six meta-criteria that represent normative goals of multiple studies: respect, trust, legitimacy, fairness, competence and accountability. To aid in the development of future evaluations, we have developed definitions for and matched specific examples of measuring each meta-criterion to serve a guide for others in the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-407
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume1
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Keywords

  • conceptual model
  • evaluation
  • process outcomes
  • public participation
  • research design
  • stakeholder engagement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: How will we measure success?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this