Stakeholder analysis for health research: Case studies from low- and middle-income countries

A. Hyder, S. Syed, P. Puvanachandra, G. Bloom, S. Sundaram, S. Mahmood, M. Iqbal, Z. Hongwen, N. Ravichandran, O. Oladepo, George Pariyo, David Peters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Future Health Systems: Innovations for Equity (FHS) is working in six partner countries in Asia and Africa, focusing on strengthening the research-policy interface in relation to specific health system research projects. These projects present an opportunity to study the influence of stakeholders on research and policy processes. Study design: Qualitative stakeholder analysis. Methods: Stakeholder analysis was conducted in each FHS country using a structured approach. A cross-country evaluation was performed concentrating on six key areas: chosen research topic; type of intervention considered; inclusion/exclusion of stakeholder groups; general stakeholder considerations; power level, power type and agreement level of stakeholders; and classification of and approaches to identified stakeholders. Results: All six countries identified a range of stakeholders but each country had a different focus. Four of the six countries identified stakeholders in addition to the guidelines, while some of the stakeholder categories were not identified by countries. The mean power level of identified stakeholders was between 3.4 and 4.5 (1 = very low; 5 = very high). The percentage of classified stakeholders that were either drivers or supporters ranged from 60% to 91%. Conclusion: Three important common areas emerge when examining the execution of the FHS country stakeholder analyses: clarity on the purpose of the analyses; value of internal vs external analysts; and the role of primary vs secondary analyses. This paper adds to the global body of knowledge on the utilization of stakeholder analysis to strengthen the research-policy interface in the developing world.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-166
Number of pages8
JournalPublic Health
Volume124
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Health
Research
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Health policy
  • Low- and middle-income countries
  • Stakeholder analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Stakeholder analysis for health research : Case studies from low- and middle-income countries. / Hyder, A.; Syed, S.; Puvanachandra, P.; Bloom, G.; Sundaram, S.; Mahmood, S.; Iqbal, M.; Hongwen, Z.; Ravichandran, N.; Oladepo, O.; Pariyo, George; Peters, David.

In: Public Health, Vol. 124, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 159-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hyder, A, Syed, S, Puvanachandra, P, Bloom, G, Sundaram, S, Mahmood, S, Iqbal, M, Hongwen, Z, Ravichandran, N, Oladepo, O, Pariyo, G & Peters, D 2010, 'Stakeholder analysis for health research: Case studies from low- and middle-income countries', Public Health, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2009.12.006
Hyder A, Syed S, Puvanachandra P, Bloom G, Sundaram S, Mahmood S et al. Stakeholder analysis for health research: Case studies from low- and middle-income countries. Public Health. 2010 Mar;124(3):159-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2009.12.006
Hyder, A. ; Syed, S. ; Puvanachandra, P. ; Bloom, G. ; Sundaram, S. ; Mahmood, S. ; Iqbal, M. ; Hongwen, Z. ; Ravichandran, N. ; Oladepo, O. ; Pariyo, George ; Peters, David. / Stakeholder analysis for health research : Case studies from low- and middle-income countries. In: Public Health. 2010 ; Vol. 124, No. 3. pp. 159-166.
@article{ce6eb404a9f74800955df489ba62808c,
title = "Stakeholder analysis for health research: Case studies from low- and middle-income countries",
abstract = "Objectives: Future Health Systems: Innovations for Equity (FHS) is working in six partner countries in Asia and Africa, focusing on strengthening the research-policy interface in relation to specific health system research projects. These projects present an opportunity to study the influence of stakeholders on research and policy processes. Study design: Qualitative stakeholder analysis. Methods: Stakeholder analysis was conducted in each FHS country using a structured approach. A cross-country evaluation was performed concentrating on six key areas: chosen research topic; type of intervention considered; inclusion/exclusion of stakeholder groups; general stakeholder considerations; power level, power type and agreement level of stakeholders; and classification of and approaches to identified stakeholders. Results: All six countries identified a range of stakeholders but each country had a different focus. Four of the six countries identified stakeholders in addition to the guidelines, while some of the stakeholder categories were not identified by countries. The mean power level of identified stakeholders was between 3.4 and 4.5 (1 = very low; 5 = very high). The percentage of classified stakeholders that were either drivers or supporters ranged from 60{\%} to 91{\%}. Conclusion: Three important common areas emerge when examining the execution of the FHS country stakeholder analyses: clarity on the purpose of the analyses; value of internal vs external analysts; and the role of primary vs secondary analyses. This paper adds to the global body of knowledge on the utilization of stakeholder analysis to strengthen the research-policy interface in the developing world.",
keywords = "Health policy, Low- and middle-income countries, Stakeholder analysis",
author = "A. Hyder and S. Syed and P. Puvanachandra and G. Bloom and S. Sundaram and S. Mahmood and M. Iqbal and Z. Hongwen and N. Ravichandran and O. Oladepo and George Pariyo and David Peters",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.puhe.2009.12.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "159--166",
journal = "Public Health",
issn = "0033-3506",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder analysis for health research

T2 - Case studies from low- and middle-income countries

AU - Hyder, A.

AU - Syed, S.

AU - Puvanachandra, P.

AU - Bloom, G.

AU - Sundaram, S.

AU - Mahmood, S.

AU - Iqbal, M.

AU - Hongwen, Z.

AU - Ravichandran, N.

AU - Oladepo, O.

AU - Pariyo, George

AU - Peters, David

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Objectives: Future Health Systems: Innovations for Equity (FHS) is working in six partner countries in Asia and Africa, focusing on strengthening the research-policy interface in relation to specific health system research projects. These projects present an opportunity to study the influence of stakeholders on research and policy processes. Study design: Qualitative stakeholder analysis. Methods: Stakeholder analysis was conducted in each FHS country using a structured approach. A cross-country evaluation was performed concentrating on six key areas: chosen research topic; type of intervention considered; inclusion/exclusion of stakeholder groups; general stakeholder considerations; power level, power type and agreement level of stakeholders; and classification of and approaches to identified stakeholders. Results: All six countries identified a range of stakeholders but each country had a different focus. Four of the six countries identified stakeholders in addition to the guidelines, while some of the stakeholder categories were not identified by countries. The mean power level of identified stakeholders was between 3.4 and 4.5 (1 = very low; 5 = very high). The percentage of classified stakeholders that were either drivers or supporters ranged from 60% to 91%. Conclusion: Three important common areas emerge when examining the execution of the FHS country stakeholder analyses: clarity on the purpose of the analyses; value of internal vs external analysts; and the role of primary vs secondary analyses. This paper adds to the global body of knowledge on the utilization of stakeholder analysis to strengthen the research-policy interface in the developing world.

AB - Objectives: Future Health Systems: Innovations for Equity (FHS) is working in six partner countries in Asia and Africa, focusing on strengthening the research-policy interface in relation to specific health system research projects. These projects present an opportunity to study the influence of stakeholders on research and policy processes. Study design: Qualitative stakeholder analysis. Methods: Stakeholder analysis was conducted in each FHS country using a structured approach. A cross-country evaluation was performed concentrating on six key areas: chosen research topic; type of intervention considered; inclusion/exclusion of stakeholder groups; general stakeholder considerations; power level, power type and agreement level of stakeholders; and classification of and approaches to identified stakeholders. Results: All six countries identified a range of stakeholders but each country had a different focus. Four of the six countries identified stakeholders in addition to the guidelines, while some of the stakeholder categories were not identified by countries. The mean power level of identified stakeholders was between 3.4 and 4.5 (1 = very low; 5 = very high). The percentage of classified stakeholders that were either drivers or supporters ranged from 60% to 91%. Conclusion: Three important common areas emerge when examining the execution of the FHS country stakeholder analyses: clarity on the purpose of the analyses; value of internal vs external analysts; and the role of primary vs secondary analyses. This paper adds to the global body of knowledge on the utilization of stakeholder analysis to strengthen the research-policy interface in the developing world.

KW - Health policy

KW - Low- and middle-income countries

KW - Stakeholder analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951205961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951205961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.12.006

DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.12.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 20227095

AN - SCOPUS:77951205961

VL - 124

SP - 159

EP - 166

JO - Public Health

JF - Public Health

SN - 0033-3506

IS - 3

ER -