Stakeholder analysis for a maternal and newborn health project in Eastern Uganda

Gertrude Namazzi, Suzanne N. Kiwanuka, Waiswa Peter, Bua John, Okui Olico, Katharine Allen, Adnan A. Hyder, Kiracho Elizabeth Ekirapa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Based on the realization that Uganda is not on track to achieving Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5, Makerere University School of Public Health in collaboration with other partners proposed to conduct two community based maternal/newborn care interventions aimed at increasing access to health facility care through transport vouchers and use of community health workers to promote ideal family care practices. Prior to the implementation, a stakeholder analysis was undertaken to assess and map stakeholders' interests, influence/power and position in relation to the interventions; their views regarding the success and sustainability; and how this research can influence policy formulation in the country. Methods: A stakeholder analysis was carried out in March 2011 at national level and in four districts of Eastern Uganda where the proposed interventions would be conducted. At the national level, four key informant interviews were conducted with the ministry of health representative, Member of Parliament, and development partners. District health team members were interviewed and also engaged in a workshop; and at community level, twelve focus group discussions were conducted among women, men and motorcycle transporters. Results: This analysis revealed that district and community level stakeholders were high level supporters of the proposed interventions but not drivers. At community level the mothers, their spouses and transporters were of low influence due to the limited funds they possessed. National level and district stakeholders believed that the intervention is costly and cannot be affordably scaled up. They advised the study team to mobilize and sensitize the communities to contribute financially from the start in order to enhance sustainability beyond the study period. Stakeholders believed that the proposed interventions will influence policy through modeling on how to improve the quality of maternal/newborn health services, male involvement, and improved accessibility of services. Conclusion: Most of the stakeholders interviewed were supporters of the proposed maternal and newborn care intervention because of the positive benefits of the intervention. The analysis highlighted stakeholder concerns that will be included in the final project design and that could also be useful in countries of similar setting that are planning to set up programmes geared at increasing access to maternal and new born interventions. Key among these concerns was the need to use both human and financial resources that are locally available in the community, to address supply side barriers that influence access to maternal and child healthcare. Research to policy translation, therefore, will require mutual trust, continued dialogue and engagement of the researchers, implementers and policy makers to enable scale up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number58
JournalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2013

Fingerprint

Uganda
Mothers
Maternal Health Services
Newborn Infant
Motorcycles
Public Health Schools
Health Services Accessibility
Family Practice
Health Facilities
Health
Financial Management
Focus Groups
Administrative Personnel
Spouses
Research
Maternal Health
Infant Health
Research Personnel
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Eastern Uganda
  • Future health systems
  • Maternal and newborn health
  • Stakeholder analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Stakeholder analysis for a maternal and newborn health project in Eastern Uganda. / Namazzi, Gertrude; Kiwanuka, Suzanne N.; Peter, Waiswa; John, Bua; Olico, Okui; Allen, Katharine; Hyder, Adnan A.; Ekirapa, Kiracho Elizabeth.

In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol. 13, 58, 04.03.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Namazzi, Gertrude ; Kiwanuka, Suzanne N. ; Peter, Waiswa ; John, Bua ; Olico, Okui ; Allen, Katharine ; Hyder, Adnan A. ; Ekirapa, Kiracho Elizabeth. / Stakeholder analysis for a maternal and newborn health project in Eastern Uganda. In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013 ; Vol. 13.
@article{b71215f907484569a689c05ddab31abe,
title = "Stakeholder analysis for a maternal and newborn health project in Eastern Uganda",
abstract = "Background: Based on the realization that Uganda is not on track to achieving Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5, Makerere University School of Public Health in collaboration with other partners proposed to conduct two community based maternal/newborn care interventions aimed at increasing access to health facility care through transport vouchers and use of community health workers to promote ideal family care practices. Prior to the implementation, a stakeholder analysis was undertaken to assess and map stakeholders' interests, influence/power and position in relation to the interventions; their views regarding the success and sustainability; and how this research can influence policy formulation in the country. Methods: A stakeholder analysis was carried out in March 2011 at national level and in four districts of Eastern Uganda where the proposed interventions would be conducted. At the national level, four key informant interviews were conducted with the ministry of health representative, Member of Parliament, and development partners. District health team members were interviewed and also engaged in a workshop; and at community level, twelve focus group discussions were conducted among women, men and motorcycle transporters. Results: This analysis revealed that district and community level stakeholders were high level supporters of the proposed interventions but not drivers. At community level the mothers, their spouses and transporters were of low influence due to the limited funds they possessed. National level and district stakeholders believed that the intervention is costly and cannot be affordably scaled up. They advised the study team to mobilize and sensitize the communities to contribute financially from the start in order to enhance sustainability beyond the study period. Stakeholders believed that the proposed interventions will influence policy through modeling on how to improve the quality of maternal/newborn health services, male involvement, and improved accessibility of services. Conclusion: Most of the stakeholders interviewed were supporters of the proposed maternal and newborn care intervention because of the positive benefits of the intervention. The analysis highlighted stakeholder concerns that will be included in the final project design and that could also be useful in countries of similar setting that are planning to set up programmes geared at increasing access to maternal and new born interventions. Key among these concerns was the need to use both human and financial resources that are locally available in the community, to address supply side barriers that influence access to maternal and child healthcare. Research to policy translation, therefore, will require mutual trust, continued dialogue and engagement of the researchers, implementers and policy makers to enable scale up.",
keywords = "Eastern Uganda, Future health systems, Maternal and newborn health, Stakeholder analysis",
author = "Gertrude Namazzi and Kiwanuka, {Suzanne N.} and Waiswa Peter and Bua John and Okui Olico and Katharine Allen and Hyder, {Adnan A.} and Ekirapa, {Kiracho Elizabeth}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2393-13-58",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth",
issn = "1471-2393",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder analysis for a maternal and newborn health project in Eastern Uganda

AU - Namazzi, Gertrude

AU - Kiwanuka, Suzanne N.

AU - Peter, Waiswa

AU - John, Bua

AU - Olico, Okui

AU - Allen, Katharine

AU - Hyder, Adnan A.

AU - Ekirapa, Kiracho Elizabeth

PY - 2013/3/4

Y1 - 2013/3/4

N2 - Background: Based on the realization that Uganda is not on track to achieving Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5, Makerere University School of Public Health in collaboration with other partners proposed to conduct two community based maternal/newborn care interventions aimed at increasing access to health facility care through transport vouchers and use of community health workers to promote ideal family care practices. Prior to the implementation, a stakeholder analysis was undertaken to assess and map stakeholders' interests, influence/power and position in relation to the interventions; their views regarding the success and sustainability; and how this research can influence policy formulation in the country. Methods: A stakeholder analysis was carried out in March 2011 at national level and in four districts of Eastern Uganda where the proposed interventions would be conducted. At the national level, four key informant interviews were conducted with the ministry of health representative, Member of Parliament, and development partners. District health team members were interviewed and also engaged in a workshop; and at community level, twelve focus group discussions were conducted among women, men and motorcycle transporters. Results: This analysis revealed that district and community level stakeholders were high level supporters of the proposed interventions but not drivers. At community level the mothers, their spouses and transporters were of low influence due to the limited funds they possessed. National level and district stakeholders believed that the intervention is costly and cannot be affordably scaled up. They advised the study team to mobilize and sensitize the communities to contribute financially from the start in order to enhance sustainability beyond the study period. Stakeholders believed that the proposed interventions will influence policy through modeling on how to improve the quality of maternal/newborn health services, male involvement, and improved accessibility of services. Conclusion: Most of the stakeholders interviewed were supporters of the proposed maternal and newborn care intervention because of the positive benefits of the intervention. The analysis highlighted stakeholder concerns that will be included in the final project design and that could also be useful in countries of similar setting that are planning to set up programmes geared at increasing access to maternal and new born interventions. Key among these concerns was the need to use both human and financial resources that are locally available in the community, to address supply side barriers that influence access to maternal and child healthcare. Research to policy translation, therefore, will require mutual trust, continued dialogue and engagement of the researchers, implementers and policy makers to enable scale up.

AB - Background: Based on the realization that Uganda is not on track to achieving Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5, Makerere University School of Public Health in collaboration with other partners proposed to conduct two community based maternal/newborn care interventions aimed at increasing access to health facility care through transport vouchers and use of community health workers to promote ideal family care practices. Prior to the implementation, a stakeholder analysis was undertaken to assess and map stakeholders' interests, influence/power and position in relation to the interventions; their views regarding the success and sustainability; and how this research can influence policy formulation in the country. Methods: A stakeholder analysis was carried out in March 2011 at national level and in four districts of Eastern Uganda where the proposed interventions would be conducted. At the national level, four key informant interviews were conducted with the ministry of health representative, Member of Parliament, and development partners. District health team members were interviewed and also engaged in a workshop; and at community level, twelve focus group discussions were conducted among women, men and motorcycle transporters. Results: This analysis revealed that district and community level stakeholders were high level supporters of the proposed interventions but not drivers. At community level the mothers, their spouses and transporters were of low influence due to the limited funds they possessed. National level and district stakeholders believed that the intervention is costly and cannot be affordably scaled up. They advised the study team to mobilize and sensitize the communities to contribute financially from the start in order to enhance sustainability beyond the study period. Stakeholders believed that the proposed interventions will influence policy through modeling on how to improve the quality of maternal/newborn health services, male involvement, and improved accessibility of services. Conclusion: Most of the stakeholders interviewed were supporters of the proposed maternal and newborn care intervention because of the positive benefits of the intervention. The analysis highlighted stakeholder concerns that will be included in the final project design and that could also be useful in countries of similar setting that are planning to set up programmes geared at increasing access to maternal and new born interventions. Key among these concerns was the need to use both human and financial resources that are locally available in the community, to address supply side barriers that influence access to maternal and child healthcare. Research to policy translation, therefore, will require mutual trust, continued dialogue and engagement of the researchers, implementers and policy makers to enable scale up.

KW - Eastern Uganda

KW - Future health systems

KW - Maternal and newborn health

KW - Stakeholder analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875001593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875001593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2393-13-58

DO - 10.1186/1471-2393-13-58

M3 - Article

C2 - 23497057

AN - SCOPUS:84875001593

VL - 13

JO - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

JF - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

SN - 1471-2393

M1 - 58

ER -