Stability of fixation of proximal phalanx unicondylar fractures of the hand: A biomechanical cadaver study

Michael A. Sirota, Brent G. Parks, James Patrick Higgins, Kenneth R. Means

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the relative stability of various fixation methods for proximal phalanx intra-articular unicondylar fractures during simulated early active motion. Methods: We created proximal phalangeal intra-articular unicondylar fractures in 13 fresh-frozen human cadaveric hands. Using a saw through a dorsal approach, we made an osteotomy beginning in the intercondylar notch and extending proximally at a 45° angle to the radial border of the proximal phalanx. We fixed each of the 4 fingers on each hand with a 1.5-mm headless compression screw, a 1.5-mm lag screw, two 1.1-mm smooth K-wires, or one 1.1-mm smooth K-wire. We rotated the order of constructs randomly for each hand. We simulated active range of motion on a custom-loading device at 0.25 Hz from full finger extension to full flexion for 2,000 cycles and measured displacement by a differential variable reluctance transducer. Results: We found no significant differences in displacement of the fracture site among the 4 methods of fixation. Movement in the control specimen with no osteotomy fixation was significantly higher than with each of the other fixation methods. Conclusions: Biomechanical stability did not differ among the fixation methods for proximal phalanx unicondylar fractures in a flexion-extension active range of motion model. Clinical relevance: Fixation of these fractures with any of the methods tested may provide sufficient stability to withstand postoperative therapy when there is no substantial resistance to active motion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-81
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Cadaver
Hand
Intra-Articular Fractures
Osteotomy
Articular Range of Motion
Fingers
Fracture Fixation
Transducers
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • 1-point fixation
  • Active range of motion
  • biomechanical
  • condyle fracture
  • proximal phalanx fracture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Stability of fixation of proximal phalanx unicondylar fractures of the hand : A biomechanical cadaver study. / Sirota, Michael A.; Parks, Brent G.; Higgins, James Patrick; Means, Kenneth R.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 77-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5fa80699c1a6426aa577cf354a6b4bd5,
title = "Stability of fixation of proximal phalanx unicondylar fractures of the hand: A biomechanical cadaver study",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the relative stability of various fixation methods for proximal phalanx intra-articular unicondylar fractures during simulated early active motion. Methods: We created proximal phalangeal intra-articular unicondylar fractures in 13 fresh-frozen human cadaveric hands. Using a saw through a dorsal approach, we made an osteotomy beginning in the intercondylar notch and extending proximally at a 45° angle to the radial border of the proximal phalanx. We fixed each of the 4 fingers on each hand with a 1.5-mm headless compression screw, a 1.5-mm lag screw, two 1.1-mm smooth K-wires, or one 1.1-mm smooth K-wire. We rotated the order of constructs randomly for each hand. We simulated active range of motion on a custom-loading device at 0.25 Hz from full finger extension to full flexion for 2,000 cycles and measured displacement by a differential variable reluctance transducer. Results: We found no significant differences in displacement of the fracture site among the 4 methods of fixation. Movement in the control specimen with no osteotomy fixation was significantly higher than with each of the other fixation methods. Conclusions: Biomechanical stability did not differ among the fixation methods for proximal phalanx unicondylar fractures in a flexion-extension active range of motion model. Clinical relevance: Fixation of these fractures with any of the methods tested may provide sufficient stability to withstand postoperative therapy when there is no substantial resistance to active motion.",
keywords = "1-point fixation, Active range of motion, biomechanical, condyle fracture, proximal phalanx fracture",
author = "Sirota, {Michael A.} and Parks, {Brent G.} and Higgins, {James Patrick} and Means, {Kenneth R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "77--81",
journal = "The Hand",
issn = "1753-1934",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stability of fixation of proximal phalanx unicondylar fractures of the hand

T2 - A biomechanical cadaver study

AU - Sirota, Michael A.

AU - Parks, Brent G.

AU - Higgins, James Patrick

AU - Means, Kenneth R.

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Purpose: To determine the relative stability of various fixation methods for proximal phalanx intra-articular unicondylar fractures during simulated early active motion. Methods: We created proximal phalangeal intra-articular unicondylar fractures in 13 fresh-frozen human cadaveric hands. Using a saw through a dorsal approach, we made an osteotomy beginning in the intercondylar notch and extending proximally at a 45° angle to the radial border of the proximal phalanx. We fixed each of the 4 fingers on each hand with a 1.5-mm headless compression screw, a 1.5-mm lag screw, two 1.1-mm smooth K-wires, or one 1.1-mm smooth K-wire. We rotated the order of constructs randomly for each hand. We simulated active range of motion on a custom-loading device at 0.25 Hz from full finger extension to full flexion for 2,000 cycles and measured displacement by a differential variable reluctance transducer. Results: We found no significant differences in displacement of the fracture site among the 4 methods of fixation. Movement in the control specimen with no osteotomy fixation was significantly higher than with each of the other fixation methods. Conclusions: Biomechanical stability did not differ among the fixation methods for proximal phalanx unicondylar fractures in a flexion-extension active range of motion model. Clinical relevance: Fixation of these fractures with any of the methods tested may provide sufficient stability to withstand postoperative therapy when there is no substantial resistance to active motion.

AB - Purpose: To determine the relative stability of various fixation methods for proximal phalanx intra-articular unicondylar fractures during simulated early active motion. Methods: We created proximal phalangeal intra-articular unicondylar fractures in 13 fresh-frozen human cadaveric hands. Using a saw through a dorsal approach, we made an osteotomy beginning in the intercondylar notch and extending proximally at a 45° angle to the radial border of the proximal phalanx. We fixed each of the 4 fingers on each hand with a 1.5-mm headless compression screw, a 1.5-mm lag screw, two 1.1-mm smooth K-wires, or one 1.1-mm smooth K-wire. We rotated the order of constructs randomly for each hand. We simulated active range of motion on a custom-loading device at 0.25 Hz from full finger extension to full flexion for 2,000 cycles and measured displacement by a differential variable reluctance transducer. Results: We found no significant differences in displacement of the fracture site among the 4 methods of fixation. Movement in the control specimen with no osteotomy fixation was significantly higher than with each of the other fixation methods. Conclusions: Biomechanical stability did not differ among the fixation methods for proximal phalanx unicondylar fractures in a flexion-extension active range of motion model. Clinical relevance: Fixation of these fractures with any of the methods tested may provide sufficient stability to withstand postoperative therapy when there is no substantial resistance to active motion.

KW - 1-point fixation

KW - Active range of motion

KW - biomechanical

KW - condyle fracture

KW - proximal phalanx fracture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871616157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871616157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.026

DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 23200947

AN - SCOPUS:84871616157

VL - 38

SP - 77

EP - 81

JO - The Hand

JF - The Hand

SN - 1753-1934

IS - 1

ER -