Abstract
Splenic artery embolization (SAE) improves hepatic artery (HA) flow in liver transplant (OLT) recipients with so-called splenic artery steal syndrome. We propose that SAE actually improves HA flow by reducing the HA buffer response (HABR). Patient 1: On postoperative day (POD) 1, Doppler ultrasonography (US) showed patent vasculature with HA resistive index (RI) of 0.8. On POD 4, aminotransferases rose dramatically; his RI was 1.0 with no diastolic flow. Octreotide was begun, but on POD 5 US showed reverse diastolic HA flow with no signal in distal HA branches. After SAE, US showed markedly improved flow, RI was 0.6, diastolic flow in the main artery, and complete visualization of all distal branches. By POD 6, liver function had normalized. RI in the main HA is 0.76 at 2 months postsurgery. Patient 2: On POD 1, RI was 1.0. US showed worsening intrahepatic signal, with no signal in the intrahepatic branches and reversed diastolic flow despite good graft function. On POD 7, SAE improved the intrahepatic waveform and RI (from 1.0 to 0.72). Patient 3: Intraoperative reverse diastolic arterial flow persisted on PODs 1, 2, and 3, with progressive loss of US signal in peripheral HA branches. SAE on POD 4 improved the RI (0.86) and peripheral arterial branch signals. Patient 4: US on POD 1 showed good HA flow with a normal RI (0.7). A sudden waveform change on POD 2 with increasing RI (0.83) prompted SAE, after which the wave form normalized, with reconstitution of a normal diastolic flow (RI 0.68). In conclusion, these reports confirm the usefulness of SAE for poor HA flow but suggest that inflow steal was not the problem. Rather than producing an increase in arterial inflow, SAE worked by reducing portal flow and HABR, thereby reducing end-organ outflow resistance. Evidence of this effect is the marked reduction of the RI after the SAE to 0.6, 0.72, 0.86, and 0.68, in patients 1-4, respectively. SAE reduces excessive portal vein flow and thereby ameliorates an overactive HABR that can cause graft dysfunction and ultimately HA thrombosis.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 374-379 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Liver Transplantation |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Transplantation
Cite this
"Splenic artery steal syndrome" : Is a misnomer: The cause is portal hyperperfusion, not arterial siphon. / Quintini, Cristiano; Hirose, Kenzo; Hashimoto, Koji; Diago, Teresa; Aucejo, Federico; Eghtesad, Bijan; Vogt, David; Pierce, Gregory; Baker, Mark; Kelly, Dympna; Miller, Charles M.
In: Liver Transplantation, Vol. 14, No. 3, 03.2008, p. 374-379.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - "Splenic artery steal syndrome"
T2 - Is a misnomer: The cause is portal hyperperfusion, not arterial siphon
AU - Quintini, Cristiano
AU - Hirose, Kenzo
AU - Hashimoto, Koji
AU - Diago, Teresa
AU - Aucejo, Federico
AU - Eghtesad, Bijan
AU - Vogt, David
AU - Pierce, Gregory
AU - Baker, Mark
AU - Kelly, Dympna
AU - Miller, Charles M.
PY - 2008/3
Y1 - 2008/3
N2 - Splenic artery embolization (SAE) improves hepatic artery (HA) flow in liver transplant (OLT) recipients with so-called splenic artery steal syndrome. We propose that SAE actually improves HA flow by reducing the HA buffer response (HABR). Patient 1: On postoperative day (POD) 1, Doppler ultrasonography (US) showed patent vasculature with HA resistive index (RI) of 0.8. On POD 4, aminotransferases rose dramatically; his RI was 1.0 with no diastolic flow. Octreotide was begun, but on POD 5 US showed reverse diastolic HA flow with no signal in distal HA branches. After SAE, US showed markedly improved flow, RI was 0.6, diastolic flow in the main artery, and complete visualization of all distal branches. By POD 6, liver function had normalized. RI in the main HA is 0.76 at 2 months postsurgery. Patient 2: On POD 1, RI was 1.0. US showed worsening intrahepatic signal, with no signal in the intrahepatic branches and reversed diastolic flow despite good graft function. On POD 7, SAE improved the intrahepatic waveform and RI (from 1.0 to 0.72). Patient 3: Intraoperative reverse diastolic arterial flow persisted on PODs 1, 2, and 3, with progressive loss of US signal in peripheral HA branches. SAE on POD 4 improved the RI (0.86) and peripheral arterial branch signals. Patient 4: US on POD 1 showed good HA flow with a normal RI (0.7). A sudden waveform change on POD 2 with increasing RI (0.83) prompted SAE, after which the wave form normalized, with reconstitution of a normal diastolic flow (RI 0.68). In conclusion, these reports confirm the usefulness of SAE for poor HA flow but suggest that inflow steal was not the problem. Rather than producing an increase in arterial inflow, SAE worked by reducing portal flow and HABR, thereby reducing end-organ outflow resistance. Evidence of this effect is the marked reduction of the RI after the SAE to 0.6, 0.72, 0.86, and 0.68, in patients 1-4, respectively. SAE reduces excessive portal vein flow and thereby ameliorates an overactive HABR that can cause graft dysfunction and ultimately HA thrombosis.
AB - Splenic artery embolization (SAE) improves hepatic artery (HA) flow in liver transplant (OLT) recipients with so-called splenic artery steal syndrome. We propose that SAE actually improves HA flow by reducing the HA buffer response (HABR). Patient 1: On postoperative day (POD) 1, Doppler ultrasonography (US) showed patent vasculature with HA resistive index (RI) of 0.8. On POD 4, aminotransferases rose dramatically; his RI was 1.0 with no diastolic flow. Octreotide was begun, but on POD 5 US showed reverse diastolic HA flow with no signal in distal HA branches. After SAE, US showed markedly improved flow, RI was 0.6, diastolic flow in the main artery, and complete visualization of all distal branches. By POD 6, liver function had normalized. RI in the main HA is 0.76 at 2 months postsurgery. Patient 2: On POD 1, RI was 1.0. US showed worsening intrahepatic signal, with no signal in the intrahepatic branches and reversed diastolic flow despite good graft function. On POD 7, SAE improved the intrahepatic waveform and RI (from 1.0 to 0.72). Patient 3: Intraoperative reverse diastolic arterial flow persisted on PODs 1, 2, and 3, with progressive loss of US signal in peripheral HA branches. SAE on POD 4 improved the RI (0.86) and peripheral arterial branch signals. Patient 4: US on POD 1 showed good HA flow with a normal RI (0.7). A sudden waveform change on POD 2 with increasing RI (0.83) prompted SAE, after which the wave form normalized, with reconstitution of a normal diastolic flow (RI 0.68). In conclusion, these reports confirm the usefulness of SAE for poor HA flow but suggest that inflow steal was not the problem. Rather than producing an increase in arterial inflow, SAE worked by reducing portal flow and HABR, thereby reducing end-organ outflow resistance. Evidence of this effect is the marked reduction of the RI after the SAE to 0.6, 0.72, 0.86, and 0.68, in patients 1-4, respectively. SAE reduces excessive portal vein flow and thereby ameliorates an overactive HABR that can cause graft dysfunction and ultimately HA thrombosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149102901&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41149102901&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/lt.21386
DO - 10.1002/lt.21386
M3 - Article
C2 - 18306381
AN - SCOPUS:41149102901
VL - 14
SP - 374
EP - 379
JO - Liver Transplantation
JF - Liver Transplantation
SN - 1527-6465
IS - 3
ER -